Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Intubation During Resuscitation (IDR)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02277951
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : October 29, 2014
Last Update Posted : October 29, 2014
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Lukasz Szarpak, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Groups and Cohorts Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:

The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of four intubation devices ( in a cardiopulmonary scenario with uninterrupted chest compressions with a standardized manikin model.

The investigators hypothesized that fiberoscope laryngoscopes may improve success rates.


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Intubation Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Device: The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope Device: The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope Device: The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope Device: The Macintosh Laryngoscope

Detailed Description:

Devices using in study:

The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope (BONFILS)(KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA), The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope (RIFL)( AI Medical Devices, Inc., Williamston, MI, USA), The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope Blade Mac#3(C-MAC®S) (KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA) The Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade no. 3 (MAC) (LifeLine Medical, Inc., Brooksville, FL, USA).

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Groups and Cohorts Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 141 participants
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Comparison of Four Types of Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation During Chest Compressions
Study Start Date : May 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date : July 2014
Actual Study Completion Date : July 2014
Groups and Cohorts
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Groups and Cohorts Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
Participants
The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope the Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope the C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope the Macintosh Laryngoscope
 Device: The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.

Device: The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope
Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.

Device: The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope
Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.

Device: The Macintosh Laryngoscope
Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Groups and Cohorts Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Time to successful intubation [ Time Frame: Subjects complete study in 1 day ]
    The devices to be compared include (1) The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope , (2) the Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope, (3) the C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope, (4) the Macintosh Laryngoscope. Successful intubation will be measured in the seconds from insertion of an intubation device to the first manual ventilation of the mannequin's lungs.

  2. Success rate of ETI [ Time Frame: Subjects complete study in 1 day ]
    The devices to be compared include (1) The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope , (2) the Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope, (3) the C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope, (4) the Macintosh Laryngoscope. Successful intubation will be measured in the seconds from insertion of an intubation device to the first manual ventilation of the mannequin's lungs.


Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Groups and Cohorts Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Older Adult
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Sampling Method:   Probability Sample
Study Population
Personnel of emergency medical services and hospital emergency units
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • experienced emergency personnel: nurses, paramedics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no experience in out-of-hospital emergency medicine
Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Groups and Cohorts Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

No Contacts or Locations Provided
More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Groups and Cohorts Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Lukasz Szarpak, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02277951    
Other Study ID Numbers: InternationalIRRE
First Posted: October 29, 2014    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: October 29, 2014
Last Verified: October 2014