Working…
COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.
Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov.

Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus.
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 Versus a Sodium Picosulfate and Magnesium Salt Solution Using Day Before-Only Dosing Regimen in Adults.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02273141
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : October 23, 2014
Results First Posted : April 18, 2017
Last Update Posted : May 15, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Norgine

Brief Summary:
This study evaluates the efficacy, safety and tolerability of NER1006 versus a sodium picosulfate and magnesium salt solution (SP + MS) in adult patients requiring bowel cleansing prior to any procedure that requires a clean bowel, using a Day Before Only Dosing regimen. Approximately 484 patients will be randomised with the aim of achieving a minimum of 220 patients in each of the 2 groups.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Carcinoma Colon Cleansing Drug: NER1006, Day Before-Only Dosing Drug: SP+MS, Day Before-Only Dosing Phase 3

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 515 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Screening
Official Title: A Multicenter Randomized Parallel Group Phase III Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of NER1006 (a Low Volume Bowel Cleansing Solution) Versus Sodium Picosulfate and Magnesium Salt (SP+MS) Solution Using Day Before-Only Dosing Regimen in Adults.
Study Start Date : November 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date : August 2015
Actual Study Completion Date : August 2015

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Sodium

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: NER1006, Day Before-Only Dosing
NER1006 1-Day Day Before-Only Split-Dosing Regimen (to commence on the evening of the day before colonoscopy).
Drug: NER1006, Day Before-Only Dosing
The subject will self-administer both doses of NER1006 in the evening of Day 1 with 1-2 hours interval. Subject will take mandatory additional clear fluid after each dose.

Active Comparator: SP+MS, Day Before-Only Dosing
SP+MS 1-Day Day Before-Only Split-Dosing Regimen (to commence on the morning of the day before colonoscopy).
Drug: SP+MS, Day Before-Only Dosing
The subject will self-administer SP+MS in the morning of Day 1 and afternoon of Day 1. Subject will take mandatory additional clear fluid after each dose.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of Patients With Successful Bowel Cleansing (Overall Colon) [ Time Frame: One day (day before colonoscopy) ]
    The overall quality of bowel cleansing was assessed by a blinded central reader (an experienced and trained colonoscopist) using the segmental scores of the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS). A final HCS grading of A, B, C or D was derived. Grades A and B are classified as successful (i.e. all mucosa could be visualized) and C and D are classified as unsuccessful. Comparison of overall success of cleansing with NER1006 versus SP+MS was evaluated using a non-inferiority study design.

  2. Number of Patients With 'Excellent Plus Good' (Highly Effective) Bowel Cleansing (Colon Ascendens) [ Time Frame: One day (day before colonoscopy) ]
    The overall quality of bowel cleansing was assessed by a blinded central reader (an experienced and trained colonoscopist) using the segmental scores of the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS). Highly effective cleansing in the colon ascendens corresponded to scores 3 (Good) or 4 (Excellent) of the HCS. Adequate plus failure of cleansing corresponded to score 0-2. Comparison of 'Excellent plus good' cleansing of the colon ascendens using NER1006 versus SP+MS was evaluated using a non-inferiority study design.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Adenoma Detection Rate (Colon Ascendens) [ Time Frame: One day (day before colonoscopy). ]
    Comparison of the number of patients with at least one adenoma detected in the colon ascendens when NER1006 is used for bowel cleansing versus SP+MS. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) defined as the number of patients with at least one adenoma in the colon ascendens.

  2. Adenoma Detection Rate (Overall Colon) [ Time Frame: One day (day before colonoscopy) ]
    Comparison of the number of patients with at least one adenoma detected in the overall colon when NER1006 is used for bowel cleansing versus SP+MS. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) defined as the number of patients with at least one adenoma in the overall colon.

  3. Polyp Detection Rate (Colon Ascendens) [ Time Frame: One day (day before colonoscopy) ]
    Comparison of the number of patients with at least one polyp detected in the colon ascendens when NER1006 is used for bowel cleansing versus SP+MS. Polyp detection rate (PDR) defined as the number of patients with at least one polyp in the colon ascendens.

  4. Polyp Detection Rate (Overall Colon) [ Time Frame: One day (day before colonoscopy) ]
    Comparison of the number of patients with at least one polyp detected in the overall colon when NER1006 is used for bowel cleansing versus SP+MS. Polyp detection rate (PDR) defined as the number of patients with at least one polyp in the overall colon.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 85 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must provide written informed consent.
  • Male and female outpatients and inpatients aged: ≥18 to ≤85 years undergoing a screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy.
  • Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and at Visit 2 and must be practising one of the following methods of birth control and agree to continue with the regimen throughout the study period (unless postmenopausal or surgically sterile, or whose sole sexual partner has had a successful vasectomy):

    • Oral, implantable, or injectable contraceptives (for a minimum of three months before study entry) in combination with a condom;
    • Intrauterine device in combination with a condom;
    • Double barrier method (condom* and occlusive cap [diaphragm or cervical/vault caps] with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository).
  • Willing, able and competent to complete the entire study and to comply with instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with past history within last 12 months or current episode of severe constipation (requiring repeated use of laxatives/enema or physical intervention before resolution), known or suspected ileus, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastric retention, bowel perforation, toxic colitis or megacolon.
  • Patients with ongoing severe acute Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
  • Patients who have had previous significant gastrointestinal surgeries, including colonic resection, sub-total colectomy, abdomino-perineal resection, de-functioning colostomy, Hartmann's procedure and de-functioning ileostomy or other similar surgeries involving structure and function of the small or large colon.
  • Regular use of laxatives or colon motility altering drugs in the last month (i.e. more than 2-3 times per week) and/or laxative use within 72 hours prior to administration of the preparation.
  • Patients with active intestinal bleeding episodes or with a clinically significant low hemoglobin level <9 g/dL for women and <11 g/dL for men at screening.
  • Known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency.
  • Known phenylketonuria.
  • Known hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols, ascorbic acid and sulfates (not including sulfa-based products), sodium picosulfate and magnesium salt compounds, or any other component of the study drug or comparator
  • Past history within the last 12 months or evidence of any on-going clinically relevant electrocardiogram abnormalities (e.g. arrhythmias).
  • History of uncontrolled hypertension with systolic blood pressure >170 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg.
  • Patients with cardiac insufficiency NYHA grades III or IV.
  • Patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency (i.e. with GFR, <60 mL/min/1.73m2).
  • Patient with serum albumin <3.4 g/dL.
  • Patients with liver disease of grades B and C according to the Child Pugh classification.
  • Patients suffering from dehydration at screening as evaluated by the Investigator from physical examination and laboratory investigations.
  • Patients with clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities, whether pre-existing or noted at screening, such as hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperphosphatemia, hypermagnesemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcaemia, dehydration, or those secondary to the use of diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
  • Patients with any other clinically significant hematological parameters including coagulation profile at screening.
  • Patients with impaired consciousness that might predispose them to pulmonary aspiration.
  • Patients undergoing colonoscopy for foreign body removal and/or decompression.
  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating, or intending to become pregnant during the study.
  • Clinically relevant findings on physical examination based on the Investigator's judgment.
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse within the 12 months prior to dosing.
  • Concurrent participation in an investigational drug or device study or participation within three months of study entry.
  • Patients who are ordered to live in an institution on court or authority order.
  • Patients with history of rhabdomyolysis

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02273141


Locations
Show Show 19 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Norgine
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Stefan Schreiber University of Schleswig-Holstein

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Norgine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02273141    
Other Study ID Numbers: NER1006-03/2014 (DAYB)
First Posted: October 23, 2014    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: April 18, 2017
Last Update Posted: May 15, 2018
Last Verified: April 2018
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Colorectal Neoplasms
Intestinal Neoplasms
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
Digestive System Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms
Digestive System Diseases
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Colonic Diseases
Intestinal Diseases
Rectal Diseases
Picosulfate sodium
Cathartics
Gastrointestinal Agents