Effectiveness of a Computerised Prompt for Primary and Secondary Care Physicians to Refer or Refer Back Type 2 Diabetes Patients
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02229110|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : August 29, 2014
Last Update Posted : June 16, 2015
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus can receive care in the general practice or at the outpatient clinic. In the region of Amersfoort in The Netherlands, primary care practices and the hospital are connected through Diamuraal to organize the diabetes care in that region. They work in the same electronic medical record, and patients can request access to their own record (called a patient web portal). They set up Diamuraal guidelines, based on the guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners and Internists, on where the patient care needs to be allocated (primary or secondary care), depending on the amount of specific care a patient needs. Despite guidelines, not all patients are treated in the correct place.
Our hypotheses is that when we improve triage we can cause a major shift from treatment in secondary care to primary care and from primary care to self-care by using the patient web portal. Furthermore, patients who needs extra attention due to problems with their diabetes or complications can receive this extra attention due to increased e-consultation between primary care and secondary care and if necessary actually can, during a short time, be treated by an internist. We hope to achieve this by introducing a signal in the electronic medical record. This signal allocates patients according to the guidelines and warns a physician if their patients is not treated according to that guideline. The health care provider can then discuss this situation with his patient. We believe that this leads to shift in allocation of care, in which optimal care is provided and patients are made more aware of their situation which hopefully leads to better self-management and satisfaction.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Diabetes Mellitus||Other: Signal||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||2779 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Primary Purpose:||Health Services Research|
|Official Title:||Effectiveness of a Computerised Prompt for Primary and Secondary Care Physicians to Refer or Refer Back Type 2 Diabetes Patients|
|Study Start Date :||October 2013|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||October 2014|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||March 2015|
Active Comparator: Signal
In addition to usual care, there will be an automatic signal in the electronic medical record (EMR) upon opening that will show the reader that the patient is currently not treated in the correct treatment setting and it simultaneously will give advice to which treatment allocation this patient should be transferred to.
Automatic signal in the electronic medical record
No Intervention: No signal
Patients receive usual care, consisting of 4 office visits yearly
- The number of participants with change in allocation of care after intervention [ Time Frame: One year ]
One of the following:
- shift from primary care to secondary care
- shift from secondary care to primary care
- continuation of treatment in primary care but with addition of e-consultation with secondary care
- continuation of treatment in primary care but with replacement of one or more office visits in self-control
- Assembly of reasons by health care providers for not following the guidelines [ Time Frame: One year ]
- Change in quality of diabetes care [ Time Frame: One year ]Measured with Quality of Care and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes scoring system (QuED) containing scores for biomedical data (HbA1c, blood pressure, lipids, medication regimen, number of measurements)
- Change in diabetes treatment satisfaction [ Time Frame: One year ]Measured with the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ): six questions on satisfaction with treatment regimen and two questions on perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia.
- Number of participants who meet their treatment goals [ Time Frame: One year ]Measured in number of goals that are met
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02229110
|Diamuraal-associated GP practices|
|Meander Medical Center|
|Principal Investigator:||Guy EH Rutten, MD PhD||UMC Utrecht|
|Study Director:||Lioe-Ting Dijkhorst-Oei, MD, PhD||UMC Utrecht|
|Study Director:||Maaike CM Ronda, MD||UMC Utrecht|