Abdominal Wall Repair With Strattice in Germany: a Cohort Study (BASE cohort)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02168231|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified August 2018 by Ruth Kaufmann, MD, Erasmus Medical Center.
Recruitment status was: Enrolling by invitation
First Posted : June 20, 2014
Last Update Posted : August 7, 2018
Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication in surgery causing much morbidity and even mortality in patients. Despite studies on the optimal closing technique for laparotomies, the risk for incisional hernia after midline incision remains about 5-20%. It has been established that implementing a mesh reduces recurrence of the incisional hernia but still the results of repair are often disappointing. Incisional hernias can become increasingly complex due to complicated abdominal wall defects caused by a disturbed anatomy, fistulas, burst abdomen, wound and mesh infections. In these cases it is not save to repair the incisional hernia by means of a synthetic mesh and other augmentation tools need to be implemented.
In the recent years the use of biological meshes has been gaining popularity. Recent reports of the use of collagen-based prosthesis have suggested that they support new vessel growth, do not excite a significant foreign body reaction, form fewer adhesions, are well incorporated into host tissues with minimal wound contraction, and can be used in grossly contaminated wounds with fewer infective complications. Biologic meshes are harvested from a source tissue and processed for medical use but they vary widely in their processing methods. They include tissues of human or animal origins, both chemically cross-linked and non cross-linked processes, and submucosal, pericardial, or dermal tissue sources. Current studies investigating the effectiveness of these meshes are small and have short periods of follow-up. These shortcomings can be explained to high cost of the meshes and unclear indication when to use a biological mesh.
The aim of this study is to investigate the short and long term effects of the Strattice biological mesh. The investigators will also inquire why a biologic mesh was used and what the direct and indirect costs were.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment|
|Hernia of Abdominal Wall Biologic Mesh Strattice||Procedure: Complex abdominal wall repair Strattice|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Estimated Enrollment :||80 participants|
|Official Title:||Abdominal Wall Repair With Strattice in Germany: a Cohort Study (BASE Cohort)|
|Actual Study Start Date :||February 1, 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 31, 2018|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 31, 2018|
Complex abdominal wall repair Strattice
Complex abdominal wall repair Strattice
Procedure: Complex abdominal wall repair Strattice
Not applicable (cross-sectional data from a cohort selected after initial complex abdominal wall surgery with Strattice)
- Incisional hernia recurrence [ Time Frame: At one year after initial operation ]This parameter will be assessed by taking a history of the patient, and performing physical examination.
- Postoperative complications [ Time Frame: Postoperatively, until one year after initial operation ]All postoperative complications and their treatment will be registered.
- Survival [ Time Frame: Postoperatively; until three years after initial operation ]Any decease postoperatively
- EHS incisional hernia classification [ Time Frame: Perioperatively (noted just before or just after operation) ]Classification according to Ventral Hernia Working Group classification (Breuing et al. Surgery 2010; 148(3): 544-58).
- Mesh explantations [ Time Frame: Postoperatively; until three years after initial operation ]Strattice mesh explantation after operation
- Additional "abdominal wall repair" operations [ Time Frame: Postoperatively; until three years after initial operation ]Additional "abdominal wall (hernia) repair" operations after initial implantation of Strattice
- Indication of Strattice usage [ Time Frame: Perioperatively (noted just before or just after operation) ]Defined as preoperative conditions that influenced the decision (for instance: presence of stoma, fistulas, abscesses, etc.)
- Quality of Life (questionnaire-based) [ Time Frame: Postoperatively; measured at one, two and three years after initial operation ]Measured with questionnaires (SF-36, EQ-5D-5L, BIQ)
- Health economic analysis [ Time Frame: Postoperatively; until one year after initial operation ]Various cost-related parameters
- Incisional hernia recurrence [ Time Frame: At two and three years after initial operation ]This parameter will be assessed by taking a history of the patient, and performing physical examination.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02168231
|Trauma Hospital Berlin|
|Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University|
|Frankfurt am Main, Germany|
|Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich|
|St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden|
|Principal Investigator:||Ruth Kaufmann, MD||Erasmus Medical Center|