Breaking Bad News in Obstetrics: A Trial of Simulation-Debrief Based Education
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02168192|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 20, 2014
Last Update Posted : March 17, 2016
The purpose of this study is to assess the utility of training in Breaking Bad News (BBN) skills. We hypothesize that given little or no formal training in breaking bad news, obstetric providers will benefit from a curriculum of teaching breaking bad news techniques, but will benefit more from a simulation teaching technique than from a lecture in breaking bad news techniques.
The investigators also hypothesize that providers who have undergone breaking bad news simulation will receive improved scores after the simulation debriefing compared to their pre-simulation scores, and their improvement with be greater than the control group.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Breaking Bad News Skills Communications Skills Medical Education Obstetrics Simulation||Behavioral: Simulation-Debrief Behavioral: Traditional lecture||Not Applicable|
The investigators' study is part of a planned educational initiative on breaking bad news communication skills, planned for house staff in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. All subjects will undergo both a baseline and post-education simulation. The investigators' study intervention is a personalized review and debriefing of the simulation, as compared with a conventional lecture in order to assess the best curriculum for teaching this skill set.
The investigators' study design will be described, consent obtained and consenting house staff will be randomized to participate in a simulation-based education session/debrief or to attend lecture. Randomization will be achieved using sequential opaque envelopes containing allocation cards, designating group assignment. A physician who is not involved in the study will randomly insert allocation cards into the envelopes and group assignment will be concealed until after enrollment is complete.
Subjects will be assigned a study number. The list of subject identifiers and study numbers will be kept separate from other study data, and destroyed after all phases of the study are complete. All other study data will have identifying information deleted, and will be stored in a password protected database.
The investigators plan to have subjects assess baseline characteristics and breaking bad news skills using a self-assessment tool. Subsequently all house staff will be evaluated on their management of breaking bad news through a baseline SP scenario, with assessments by physician-teachers as well as the SPs . These SPs are non-physicians, and do not have supervisory control over the study subjects. The physician-teachers are the co-investigators on this study: Drs. Chazotte, Dayal, Landsberger, Bernstein, Goffman, and Karkowsky.
After this baseline assessment, the intervention group will debrief their baseline simulation with a physician educator. The control group will instead undergo a conventional lecture about "Breaking Bad News" techniques. Finally, both groups will undergo a second simulation, which will be assessed by SPs and physician-teachers
After this step, subjects will fill out self-assessment tools on BBN. House staff who did not undergo the conventional curriculum will then attend the lecture; similarly, those subjects who were not in the intervention group will then have the opportunity to review their simulation in a personal debriefing session.
Six months after the study, we plan to have all subjects fill out a self-assessment form to assess if any long-term change to their BBN skills has been sustained.
SPs will be formally trained in the scenario and in their responses, as well as in standardized assessment of the subjects.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||36 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Double (Participant, Investigator)|
|Official Title:||Breaking Bad News in Obstetrics: A Trial of Simulation-Debrief Based Education|
|Study Start Date :||November 2010|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||June 2011|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||July 2013|
Placebo Comparator: Traditional Lecture
These subjects received a 10 minute power point lecture on BBN skills.
Behavioral: Traditional lecture
Control group underwent lecture for approximately 10 minutes reviewing BBN skills.
These subjects received a formal debrief process, reviewing their prior baseline simulation.
Subjects underwent a formal debrief, reviewing the BBN skills exhibited in their prior simulation of an obstetrical communication skills scenario.
- BBN skills [ Time Frame: Immediate ]As evaluated by IRB-approved evalution
- Subject BBN confidence [ Time Frame: Immediately and 6 months post-intervention ]Subject BBN confidence about their communications skills in the setting of Breaking Bad news was evaluated immediately post-intervention and 6-months post-intervention
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02168192
|United States, New York|
|Montefiore Medical Center|
|Bronx, New York, United States, 10461|
|Principal Investigator:||Cynthia Chazotte, MD||Montefiore Medical Center|