Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Hysterosalpingography Versus Radiographic Hysterosalpingography in Female Infertility
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02108665 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : April 9, 2014
Last Update Posted : October 6, 2017
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Female Infertility | Radiation: Radiographic hysterosalpingography Radiation: Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography | Not Applicable |
Infertility is a disease which affects around 15% of couples (one union of seven) and has been increasing for 10 years. Therefore, and due to the development of methods of medically assisted procreation, demand for infertility evaluation is steadily increasing.
The infertility evaluation always begins with an accurate history, coupled with a physical examination of both partners. Indeed, infertility of a couple is due to the female partner in about two thirds of cases, the male partner in the remaining third of cases. In women, the main observed causes are ovulatory function disorders (10 to 20%), tubal causes by proximal or distal occlusion (10%), uterine causes involving intra-uterine synechiae, leiomyomas, adenomyosis, mucosal polyps (5 %), inadequate cervical mucus or cervical stenosis , and peritoneal causes such as endometriosis and post-infectious or post-surgical peritubo-ovarian adhesions (20 %).
Medical imaging is one of the key methods to identify the different etiologies in men as in women. It will serve to clarify the etiology in question and assess the likelihood of subsequent pregnancy. The initial imaging assessment for infertility in any woman includes an endovaginal ultrasound examination and a hysterosalpingography (HSG) . The use of MRI is considered as a second line in the absence of definitive diagnosis or to establish a definitive diagnosis before considering a targeted therapy. Indeed the performance of MRI for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis or fibroids mapping are well established.
HSG is the imaging technique of choice to evaluate the morphology of the uterine cavity and tubal patency. But it has several important limitations. Firstly it is an imaging method that uses x-rays and therefore delivers irradiation to the gynecological organs. Moreover, it does not allow a precise exploration of the entire abdomen and pelvis: therefore, the physician cannot have a complete assessment of the etiologies of infertility with HSG. Finally, it has a very good specificity but a relatively low sensitivity.
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 40 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Diagnostic |
Official Title: | Magnetic Resonance Imaging Hysterosalpingography Versus Radiographic Hysterosalpingography in Female Infertility |
Actual Study Start Date : | January 2013 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | April 2016 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | August 2017 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Radiographic hysterosalpingography
Realisation in first: radiographic hysterosalpingographyresonance then imaging hysterosalpingography
|
Radiation: Radiographic hysterosalpingography Radiation: Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography |
Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography
Realisation in first : magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography then a radiographic hysterosalpingography
|
Radiation: Radiographic hysterosalpingography Radiation: Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography |
- Diagnostic performance of hystérosalpingo-MRI [ Time Frame: one day ]
To assess the diagnostic performance of hystérosalpingo-MRI by its sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value.
To determine uterine cavity abnormality by the presence of the following abnormalities: synechiae, polyp, intra cavitary myoma, adenomyosis, uterine malformation.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | Female |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient who a pelvic MRI and an Hysterography, part of an infertility assessment, have been prescribed by a gynecologist physician in Nice University Hospital.
Informed consent signed Patient with social insurance Age > 18
Exclusion Criteria:
Contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography Contraindication to radiographic hysterosalpingography

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02108665
France | |
Service d'imagerie médicale Hôpital Archet II | |
Nice, France, 06000 |
Principal Investigator: | Madleen CHASSANG, MD | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice |
Responsible Party: | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02108665 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
11AOI07 |
First Posted: | April 9, 2014 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | October 6, 2017 |
Last Verified: | October 2017 |
Infertility Infertility, Female |