COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.
Get the latest public health information from CDC:

Get the latest research information from NIH: Menu

Veteran Peer-Assisted Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT02057042
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 6, 2014
Results First Posted : October 11, 2019
Last Update Posted : October 11, 2019
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
VA Office of Research and Development

Brief Summary:
The investigators will conduct a randomized clinical trial of Peer-Supported cCBT versus enhanced usual care (EUC) for 330 patients with new episodes of depression in primary care at three VA sites and their associated Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs).

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Depression Behavioral: Peer-assisted computerized CBT Behavioral: Enhanced usual care Not Applicable

Detailed Description:


Antidepressant medications and evidence-based psychotherapies are effective treatments for depression. However, antidepressant medication adherence continues to be suboptimal and offering access to and retaining patients in evidence-based psychotherapies for depression is challenging. The VHA has made major efforts to expand access to and capacity for depression focused evidence-based psychotherapies. However in 2012, only 35% of VA patients with depression completed any psychotherapy visit and only 6% completed 8 psychotherapy visits in 14 weeks, a proxy for an adequate trial.

Initiation and engagement in depression treatment may be increased if patients are offered timely access to a highly flexible, evidence-based treatment options, such as a tailored, web-based computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy (cCBT) program. cCBT has sufficient evidence for effectiveness to be a covered benefit in United Kingdom National Health Service, but has much larger effects when it is supported by clinicians or other trusted individuals. VA peer specialists, an increasing workforce in VHA mental health, are ideal candidates to support patients' engagement in depression treatment and in cCBT. Peers have been shown to promote use of Internet self-management tools, and peer specialist support for cCBT may enhance its completion and overall effectiveness through regular "check ins" and also through providing peer specific experiences, such as sharing of lived experiences and modeling of self management and recovery.


We are conducting a Hybrid Type I RCT of Peer-Supported cCBT versus enhanced usual care (EUC) for 330 patients with new episodes of depression in primary care at three VA sites and their associated CBOCs. Our specific aims are to compare PS-cCBT versus enhanced usual care (EUC) on: a) patient symptomatic, functional, and recovery-oriented outcomes, b) depression coping skills, antidepressant medication adherence, and initiation and completion of more intensive traditional psychotherapy (contingent on symptom level). Our secondary aims are to assess patient, peer, and providers' experiences in PS-cCBT versus EUC using mixed methods. Finally, our exploratory aim is to assess potential mediators of improvements in depressive symptoms or functional status.


This is a Hybrid I randomized controlled trial (RCT) of peer-supported cCBT compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) among Veterans with new diagnoses of depression in primary care. The cCBT program consists of 8 modules and will be supported by VA peer specialists with weekly contact for 12 weeks. We will assess patient symptomatic, functional and recovery-oriented outcomes at 12 and 24 week following randomization. We will also assess potential mediators of these outcomes. Bivariate and multivariate study analyses will assess the impact of the two study arms at each assessment point and over time.


Study is currently ongoing, study recruitment and follow-up is active.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 330 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Official Title: Veteran Peer-Assisted Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression
Actual Study Start Date : June 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date : September 30, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date : September 30, 2018

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: PS-cCBT
peer-assisted computerized CBT
Behavioral: Peer-assisted computerized CBT
Patients in the PS-cCBT intervention will receive usual depression care and will also receive: 1) access to Beating the Blues (BTB), an online cCBT program, 2) support of a peer specialists for 12 weeks, 3) a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and colleagues

Active Comparator: EUC
Enhanced usual care
Behavioral: Enhanced usual care
Patients randomized to EUC will receive the following enhancements: 1) patient education regarding the symptoms of depression and evidence-based depression treatments, 2) a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and colleagues 3) information about how to access local VA mental health depression treatment resources (groups, individual psychotherapy, etc), and 4) bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips.

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Functional Status [ Time Frame: change over time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) ]
    Functional status will be measured using the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). Developed from VR-36, VR-12 includes 12 original question items from the VR-36. The questions in this survey correspond to seven different health domains inlcuding general health perceptions, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy/fatigue levels, social functioning and mental health. Answers are summarized into a Physical Component Score (PCS) and a Mental Component Score (MCS) which allows for a comparison between the respondents physical and psychological health status.The VR-12 has somewhat greater precision at the lower end of the health status continuum than the SF-12. The VR-12 has been used in numerous prior VA focused studies. VR-12 MCS component scores are standardized to a mean of 50, with higher scores indicating better mental health and related functioning.

  2. Depression Symptoms [ Time Frame: change over time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) ]
    Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (IDS) at baseline, 3 months post intervention and 6 months post intervention. The ISD is a 16-item self-report instrument for measuring the severity of depression among individuals. Each item is rated on a four-point scale (0-3), and aggregate scores range from 0 to 27. The IDS has been widely used and shows acceptable reliability, with Cronbach's of 0.86. Severity of depression is scored according to the following ranges: 1-5 (no depression), 6-10 (mild), 11-15 (moderate), 16-20 (severe), and 21-27 (very severe).

  3. Recovery Orientation [ Time Frame: change over time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) ]
    Recovery orientation will be measured using the Recovery Assessment Scale - Short Form (RAS-SF). This 20-item scale is a shorter version of the RAS and has four factors: personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, reliance on others, and no domination by symptoms. The RAS-SF shows evidence for both convergent and discriminate validity when compared to quality of life, social support, and symptomatic scales. The scale is scored by summing all items (or scale items), with 100 being the highest possible overall score. Higher scores indicate greater sense of recovery.

  4. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction [ Time Frame: change over time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) ]
    The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a valid proxy for the longer Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction (Q-LES) form and will be used to assess quality of life. It consists of 14 items that patients rate on a 5-point scale to indicate their satisfaction with a variety of life domains, including physical health, mood, work, household activities, social relationships, etc. The Q-LES-Q-SF has been shown to have high levels of reliability and has been used in numerous studies of depression, including the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded STAR*D study. Responses are scored on a 5-point scale, where higher scores indicate better enjoyment and satisfaction with life (possible range 14-70).

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Skills [ Time Frame: change over time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) ]
    CBT skills will be assessed using the Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Skills Questionnaire (CBTSQ). The CBTSQ is a 16-item scale consisting of two factors, Behavioral Activation and Cognitive Restructuring. The scale shows construct validity, appears sensitive to change among patients undergoing CBT treatment, and predicts reduction in depressive symptoms. Scores are summed with a maximum score of 80. Higher scores indicate greater uptake of CBT skills.

  2. Anxiety [ Time Frame: change over time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months) ]
    Generalized Anxiety will be measured with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7). Total score ranges from 0 to 21, with "cut scores" for mild, moderate and severe anxiety. Although originally developed for generalized anxiety disorder symptoms, the GAD-7 has good operating characteristics for detection and severity ratings of panic disorder and social anxiety disorder. Scores are summed with a range of 0-21. Scores represent: 0-5 mild, 6-10 moderate, 11-15 moderate/severe, and 15-21 severe anxiety.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients will be eligible for the study if they:

  • have new episodes of depression in primary care, defined as those with a new diagnoses of depression and no prior depression diagnoses or antidepressant fills within 120 days of the index date of their depression diagnosis any of three VA study sites or associated CBOCs. Patients must enroll within 90 days of their diagnosis.
  • have a current Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 score > 10.
  • are not receiving mental health care outside of VHA.
  • have broadband internet access at home or confirm willingness, ability, and a plan to go to their VA facility to complete cCBT modules.
  • have familiarity with email and internet use.
  • have stable access to and ability to communicate by telephone.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for the study will include:

  • a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychotic features, or Bipolar I in the past 24 months.
  • a positive screen for moderate or severe substance use (AUDIT-C >7).
  • an immediate risk of suicide, requiring hospitalization or urgent evaluation (as evidenced by suicidal plan or intent).
  • participating in other research studies.
  • diagnosis of depression in the past 4 months from a non-VA provider

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT02057042

Layout table for location information
United States, Michigan
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
Battle Creek VA Medical Center, Battle Creek, MI
Battle Creek, Michigan, United States, 49037
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
Sponsors and Collaborators
VA Office of Research and Development
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Paul N Pfeiffer, MD MS VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
  Study Documents (Full-Text)

Documents provided by VA Office of Research and Development:
Publications of Results:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: VA Office of Research and Development Identifier: NCT02057042    
Other Study ID Numbers: IIR 13-310
First Posted: February 6, 2014    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: October 11, 2019
Last Update Posted: October 11, 2019
Last Verified: September 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No

Layout table for additional information
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No
Keywords provided by VA Office of Research and Development:
Peer Support
primary care
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder
Behavioral Symptoms
Mood Disorders
Mental Disorders