Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 27 of 32 for:    stem cell Spinal Cord Injury AND mesenchymal stem cells

Safety Study of Local Administration of Autologous Bone Marrow Stromal Cells in Chronic Paraplegia (CME-LEM1)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01909154
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 26, 2013
Results First Posted : March 29, 2019
Last Update Posted : March 29, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Jesús Vaquero Crespo, M.D., Puerta de Hierro University Hospital

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to confirm the security, and detect the effect of the local administration in damaged nervous tissue, of autologous bone marrow stromal cells.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Spinal Cord Injury Biological: Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy Phase 1

Detailed Description:
It is a clinical trial phase I, single center, non-randomized, uncontrolled, open prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) who were treated with autologous stromal cells of the bone marrow administrated locally (subarachnoid and intramedullar) by intrathecal microinjection and three months later, by lumbar subarachnoid administration. The minimum follow-up duration for each patient is 12 months after the first administration, or until death, if it occurs it before.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 12 participants
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Phase I Pilot Study to Evaluate the Security of Local Administration of Autologous Stem Cells Obtained From the Bone Marrow Stroma, in Traumatic Injuries of the Spinal Cord
Study Start Date : March 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date : April 2014
Actual Study Completion Date : March 2015

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy
Autologous bone marrow adult mesenchymal stem cells expanded in vitro. Administered by Intrathecal injection (subarachnoid and intramedullary). Depending on centromedullary post-traumatic injury: bone marrow stromal stem cells administration (MSCs) at the minimum dose of 100x106 followed by subarachnoid administration of 30x106 MSCs,3 months later
Biological: Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy
Stem cells administration locally
Other Name: BMMSCs= Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Safety-Number of Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Up to 12 months ]

    Clinical evaluation of possible adverse effects is performed daily at the first week after the first administration of stem cells and weekly until the 6 months follow-up visit and then at month 9 and 12. .

    • During the first stem cells administration (during surgery): Changes in vital signs (ECG, Blood Pressure (BP), Heart Rate (HR) were evaluated
    • During the second stem cells administration: Changes in vital signs (BP, HR), headache and meningeal irritation were evaluated
    • During the first weeks, after the first and the second administrations, the possibility of meningeal irritation, headache and infectious complications were considerate.

    MedDRA stardards are followed



Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Efficacy-Sensitivity Recovery Using ASIA Scale [ Time Frame: sensitivity before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) ]

    Sensitivity recovery was measured using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale to measure the Surface sensitivity (LTS), pain sensitivity (PPS), and the degree of motor function in key muscles (MS). The sum of MS, LTS, and PPS configure total ASIA score. A minimum possible score is 0 points. A maximum possible score is 224 points for a patient with normal sensation.

    ASIA score was obtained before surgery, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Mean and standard deviation for the 12 patients were obtained at all the time points and statistically analyzed.


  2. Efficacy-Changes in the Level of Chronic Pain Based on the IANR-SCIFRS Scale (Pain Section) [ Time Frame: Changes in the level of Chronic pain before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) ]

    Changes in the level of chronic pain, measured by the pain section of the IANR-SCIFRS (Spinal cord injury functional rating scale (SCI-FRS) of the international association of neuroestoratology (IANR). The minimum posible score is 0, and the máximum posible score is 48, being a score of 48 a normal functioning across all categories, and 0 a severe degree of functional hándicap (significant impact of daily life).

    Pain is classified as no pain; mild pain, ordinary pain killer, effective;severe pain, narcotics required; extreme pain, uncontrolled.


  3. Efficacy- Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters Measured as the Number of Patients With SSEPs (Somatosensory Evoked Potentials) [ Time Frame: Changes in the level neurophysiological parameters improvement (baseline visit) and 6, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) ]
    Changes in the neurophysiological parameters (SSEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials) measured as number of patients WITH SSEPs, each patient through underwent neurophysiological studies before treatment, as well as six and 12 months after surgery, paying attention mainly to the presence or abscence of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), the presence or absence of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by magnetic stimulation over the scalp, and to electromyographic (EMG) recording of motor unit potentials in infralesional muscles. Previous to cell therapy in any of the patients SSEPs were recorded.

  4. Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies in Terms of máximum Cystometric Capacity [ Time Frame: Urodynamic studies before surgery and 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) ]
    Urodynamic studies in terms of voluntary micturition in flowmetry or in pressure/flow test, increase in bladder compliance. detrusor pressure (decrease on detrusor pressure is considered a clinical improvement). The neurogenic bladder is one of the biggest problems associated with SCI (spinal cord injury), with important personal and social implications.

  5. Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) [ Time Frame: changes in the spinal cord morphology on neuroimaging studies before surgery and 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) ]
    Number of patients with a decrease in volume and hyperintensity of intramedullary lesions. In general, in the areas of SCI, variable degree of spinal cord atrophy and hiperintense images are observed. These images corresponds to cysts, gliosis and myelomalacia. After cell administration a reduction of supposed cyst and a decrease or disappearance of hyperintense lesions suggest a patient improvement.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 60 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female with ages between 18 years and 60 years with of age or older functional sequelae chronically established by traumatic injury of the spinal cord (spinal segments between the vertebral bodies C6 and L1) and considered irreversible (not respond to any other treatment). In this study, the lesion is considered chronically established, when there are no signs of functional recovery after a minimum follow-up period of 6 months after the spinal cord injury. The upper age limit is justified by the low potential of in vitro expansion of bone marrow stromal cells over 60 years.
  • Complete paraplegia, with loss of motor and sensory function below the lesion (grade A in the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) Scale .
  • Spinal injury MRI morphologically visible, and without images that suggest spinal cord transection, with separation of the both ends of the spinal cord.
  • Tracking evolutionary possibility after treatment protocol and to comply physiotherapy maintained throughout the follow up period.
  • Written informed Consent according to good clinical practice (GCP) and local regulations, obtained before any study procedure.
  • Hematological parameters and creatinine, serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) in normal range according to laboratory standards, are accepted, however, small non-significant deviations according to the investigator.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Systemic disease represents an added risk to treatment
  • Patients with questions about their possible cooperation in rehabilitation-physiotherapy treatments later, or negative report psychological assessment prior.
  • Neuroimaging data showing spinal cord section with separation of the terminal portion of the spinal cord
  • Current neoplastic disease diagnosed or treated in the previous five years
  • Patients treated with hematopoietic growth factors or requiring stable anticoagulation
  • Added neurodegenerative disease
  • History of substance abuse, psychiatric illness or allergy to protein products used in the process of cell expansion
  • HIV positive serology and syphilis
  • Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C active According to the investigator's opinion if there are findings on physical examination, abnormal clinical test results or other medica relevant entries, social or psychosocial factors which might influence negatively the study.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01909154


Locations
Layout table for location information
Spain
Hospital Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, 28222
Sponsors and Collaborators
Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Jesus JV Vaquero Crespo, Dr. Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda

Publications:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Jesús Vaquero Crespo, M.D., Doctor on neurosurgery, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01909154     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: CME-LEM1
2010-023285-46 ( EudraCT Number )
First Posted: July 26, 2013    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: March 29, 2019
Last Update Posted: March 29, 2019
Last Verified: March 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: nonymized individual data of participants will be shared with Authorities at the end of the Clinical Development Plan by the CTD (Common Technical Document). Results will be published in a scientific publication.
Keywords provided by Jesús Vaquero Crespo, M.D., Puerta de Hierro University Hospital:
neurophysiological parameters improvement
spinal cord injury
biology therapy
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Spinal Cord Injuries
Wounds and Injuries
Spinal Cord Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Trauma, Nervous System