Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulator in Assessing Sensory Nerve Block Level of Spinal Anesthesia
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01768780|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : January 15, 2013
Last Update Posted : March 28, 2019
Various methods are used to assess the level of anesthesia block after spinal anesthesia. Among them, ice cubes, alcohol swabs, and needles are commonly used in the clinical setting, but ice is limited by difficulties with management and transportation, and needle assessment has problems owing to the risk of pain, infection, and injury to the patient.
Hence, the alcohol swab is commonly used in practice. However, the absence of pain is more important in the surgical process, and assessing the pain block level is more feasible in practice than assessing the sensory nerve block level using the alcohol swab.
Therefore, it seems to be better to use the peripheral nerve stimulator for the accurate assessment of the pain block level. This has the advantage of continuous measurement of the block level, which can be used in a practical manner in conjunction with the surgical incision.
Hence, the author compared the conventional method using the alcohol swab with the use of the peripheral nerve stimulator to determine which method is more practical in the measurement of spinal anesthesia block level.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Orthopedic Surgery-lower Leg Surgery||Device: the anticholinergic glycopyrrolate 0.1 ㎎ + 0-15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||58 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Study Start Date :||December 2012|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||May 2020|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||May 2020|
Experimental: sensory nerve block level of spinal anesthesia
This test group and the control group. Because within the group in two ways to check the level after spinal anesthesia will be.
Device: the anticholinergic glycopyrrolate 0.1 ㎎ + 0-15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine
The study subjects were patients with planned orthopedic surgery on the infrapatellar area with spinal anesthesia, and 58 patients were recruited sequentially.
A blood pressure machine, electrocardiogram, and pulse oximeter were connected to the patient in the operating room, and measurements were carried out every 5 minutes. Prior to the induction of anesthesia, the anticholinergic glycopyrrolate 0.1 ㎎ was intravenously administered after the confirmation of intravenous line opening status.
For spinal anesthesia, the patient was arranged in the lateral recumbent position, and then the L 3-4 area was disinfected. Depending on the surgical region, height, and weight of each patient, 10-15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine was administered through a 25 G needle.
- Efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulator as checking sensory block level after spinal anesthesia [ Time Frame: Changes of sensory block level at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes after pinal anesthesia ]The spinal anesthesia block levels were assessed and recorded using the alcohol swab and peripheral nerve stimulation, respectively.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01768780
|Contact: Ki-Young Lee, MD||02-2227-4224||KYLEE504@yuhs.ac|
|Korea, Republic of|
|Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752|
|Contact: Ki-Young Lee, MD 02-2227-4224 KYLEE504@yuhs.ac|