Good Schools Study (GSS)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01678846|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 5, 2012
Results First Posted : January 26, 2016
Last Update Posted : January 26, 2016
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Physical Violence Educational Achievement Mental Health Sexual Violence Violence Against Children||Behavioral: Good School Toolkit||Not Applicable|
Violence against children has profound effects on both children's health and their ability to do well at school. Fear, anxiety and injuries caused by violence may play a large role in both children's absenteeism and low educational achievement, and there is increasing interest from large bilateral donors in investigating this link in low income countries. The Good School Toolkit has been developed and refined for 6 years in Uganda by Raising Voices. The toolkit takes a systemic approach, involving an entire school in a process of change to reduce violence and improve teaching techniques. The Toolkit draws on the Transtheoretical Model and incorporates standard behaviour change techniques such as setting a goal and making an action plan, which are effective in modifying behaviour. This study aims to determine whether use of the Good School Toolkit reduces children's experience of violence by school staff. The investigators will also examine the effects of the Toolkit on children's educational outcomes, mental health and well-being.
The investigators will conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial in 40 primary schools in Luwero District, Uganda. More than 3500 children in Primary 5, 6 and 7 will be surveyed (aged about 11-16 years). Half of the schools will receive the Toolkit, and other half will be put on a waiting list to receive the Toolkit at the end of the study. The results from this evaluation will be used to brief policy-makers within the Ministry of Education and Sports involved in developing country-wide policy and practice around violence against children in schools.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||3820 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||The Good Schools Study: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of a Program to Prevent Violence Against Children in Schools|
|Study Start Date :||June 2012|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||July 2014|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||July 2014|
Experimental: Good School Toolkit
Schools in the intervention arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and implementation support.
Behavioral: Good School Toolkit
The Toolkit uses a six step process to create a school wide intervention that engages teachers, students, administration, and parents to reflect on how they can promote quality of education in their school. The Toolkit articulates complex ideas (what is a good learning environment, a good teacher, how to create positive discipline without using violence) through booklets, posters and school initiated learning processes. Specific modules on alternative discipline techniques and how staff can use positive discipline are included in the Toolkit. The intervention includes sessions on knowledge, attitudes and opportunities to practice new behavioural skills. Work is led by teachers and students, and supported by visits from Raising Voices staff. The Toolkit can be reviewed at (http://www.raisingvoices.org/children/good_school_toolkit.php).
No Intervention: Control
Schools in this arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and some implementation support after the end of the trial.
- Physical Violence From School Staff [ Time Frame: 2-year follow-up ]past week experience of any physical violence from school staff
- Child Mental Health [ Time Frame: 2-year follow-up ]score on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): 20 questions. Total difficulties score, divided by the number of completed items. Modelled as a continuous variable. Range 0 (no difficulties) to 2 (high difficulties).
- Educational Achievement: Word Recognition in English [ Time Frame: 2-year follow-up ]Word recognition in English(words per minute). Early Grade Reading Assessment, Uganda version. Calculated as number of words read correctly (out of a maximum of 50), divided by the time (out of a maximum of 60 seconds).
- Safety and Well-being at School [ Time Frame: At 2 year follow-up ]
Five questions. Each question asked with response options: all the time, most of the time, sometimes, never:
I feel that my teachers care about me. I feel safe in school. I feel like I belong at school. I like to spend time at school. I am scared of my teachers (reverse coded). Scores summed, modelled as a continuous variable. Range 0 (low) to 15 (high). Higher score is better safety and well-being at school.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01678846
|Multiple, Luwero District, Uganda|
|Principal Investigator:||Karen M Devries, PhD||LSHTM|