Sodium Picosulfate Plus Magnesium Citrate Versus Macrogol 4000 in the Bowel Cleansing Procedure: a Comparison of Efficiency and Compatibility
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01607099|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : May 28, 2012
Last Update Posted : November 14, 2014
For effective cleansing of the bowel prior to colonoscopy polyethylene glycol (e.g. macrogol) has widely been used in Germany. Usually patients have to drink between 4 an 6 liter of macrogol in a split dose (3 liter on the day before and 1 to 3 liter on the of the examination). One handicap of using polyethylene glycol is the occurence of nausea and vomiting which is due to the high amount of the laxativ and its bad taste. Therefore in a pilot study the investigators have detected a high fraction of patients who consider the cleansing procedure wich macrogol as "very distressing". Thus patient acceptance of the colonoscopy procedure altogether is low.
Since a few month sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate is available for bowel cleansing in Germany. This preparation tastes better and needs less fluid intake. Usually 150 ml of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate are given twice within a 12 hour interval. Patients are instructed to drink plenty of water in addition to the laxative. In the mentioned pilot study the investigators found the cleansing procedure with picosulfate/magnesium citrate to be much more compatible compared to the macrogol regime. The effectiveness expressed by the cleanness of the bowel was equal in both groups.
The investigators believe that a new protocol which contains sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate instead of macrogol will benefit the patients by fewer abdominal side effects while cleanness of the bowel at the same time will be warranted. This presumption is the reason for the present study.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Laxative Compatibility||Procedure: Compatibility||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||220 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||Sodium Picosulfate Plus Magnesium Citrate Versus Macrogol 4000 in the Bowel Cleansing Procedure: a Comparison of Efficiency and Compatibility|
|Study Start Date :||September 2012|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||February 2014|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||November 2014|
Experimental: Pico Prep
Arm in which sodium- picosulfate/magnesium citrate is used for bowel cleansing
Patients asses the compatibility of the bowel cleansing procedure
No Intervention: Standard
The standard drug macrogol is used for bowel cleansing
- Valuation "very distressing" [ Time Frame: Just before colonoscopy up to 4 hours afterwards (0 to aprox 4 hours) ]Patients will fill in a report in which they rate the stress triggered by the bowel cleansing procedure. The level ranges from 1 to 10 points. Valuations from 8 to 10 points will be considered as very distressing.
- Colon cleanness [ Time Frame: From the start to the end of colonoscopy, i.e. from 0 h to approximately 2 h ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01607099
|Technische Universität München|
|Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81675|
|Principal Investigator:||Peter Klare, MD||Technische Universität München|
|Study Director:||Wolfgang Huber, MD||Technische Universität München|