International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) (ISCHEMIA)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471522 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : November 15, 2011
Results First Posted : July 23, 2020
Last Update Posted : June 1, 2023
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
The purpose of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine the best management strategy for higher-risk patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 5179 randomized participants with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. A blinded coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA) was performed in most participants with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 to identify and exclude participants with either significant unprotected left main disease (≥50% stenosis) or those without obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all major coronary arteries). Of 8518 participants enrolled, those that had insufficient ischemia, ineligible anatomy demonstrated on CCTA or another exclusion criterion, did not go on to randomization. Eligible participants were then assigned at random to a routine invasive strategy (INV) with cardiac catheterization followed by revascularization, if feasible, plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a conservative strategy (CON) of OMT, with cardiac catheterization and revascularization reserved for those who fail OMT.
SPECIFIC AIMS
A. Primary Aim The primary aim of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine whether an initial invasive strategy of cardiac catheterization followed by optimal revascularization, if feasible, in addition to OMT, will reduce the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure in participants with SIHD and moderate or severe ischemia over an average follow-up of approximately 3.5 years compared with an initial conservative strategy of OMT alone with catheterization reserved for failure of OMT.
B. Secondary Aims Secondary aims are to determine whether an initial invasive strategy compared to a conservative strategy will improve: 1) the composite of CV death or MI; 2) angina symptoms and quality of life, as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire; 3) all-cause mortality; 4) net clinical benefit assessed by including stroke in the primary and secondary composite endpoints; and 5) individual components of the composite endpoints.
Condition: Coronary Disease Procedure: Coronary CT Angiogram Procedure: Cardiac catheterization Phase: Phase III per NIH
Condition: Cardiovascular Diseases Procedure: Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, other catheter-based interventions Phase: Phase III per NIH
Condition: Heart Diseases Procedure: Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Phase: Phase III per NIH
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Cardiovascular Diseases Coronary Disease Coronary Artery Disease Heart Diseases Myocardial Ischemia | Procedure: cardiac catheterization Procedure: coronary artery bypass graft surgery Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention Behavioral: Lifestyle Drug: Medication | Not Applicable |

Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 5179 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | None (Open Label) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) |
Study Start Date : | July 2012 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | June 30, 2019 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | May 30, 2023 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Invasive Strategy (INV)
Routine invasive strategy with cardiac catheterization followed by revascularization plus optimal medical therapy.
|
Procedure: cardiac catheterization
Narrowed blood vessels can be opened without surgery using stents or can be bypassed with surgery. To determine which is the best approach for you the doctor needs to look at your blood vessels to see where the narrowings are and how much narrowing there is. This is done by a procedure known as a cardiac catheterization.
Other Name: cath Procedure: coronary artery bypass graft surgery Artery narrowing is bypassed during surgery with a healthy artery or vein from another part of the body. This is known as coronary artery bypass grafting, or CABG (said, "cabbage"). The surgery creates new routes around narrowed and blocked heart arteries. This allows more blood flow to the heart.
Other Name: CABG Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention Percutaneous coronary intervention may be done as part of the cardiac catheterization procedure. With this procedure a small, hollow, mesh tube (stent) is inserted into the narrowed part of the artery. The stent pushes the plaque against the artery wall, and opens the vessel to allow better blood flow.
Other Name: PCI Behavioral: Lifestyle diet, physical activity, smoking cessation
Other Name: Behavior change Drug: Medication antiplatelet, statin, other lipid lowering, antihypertensive, and anti-ischemic medical therapies
Other Name: Pharmacologic Therapy |
Active Comparator: Conservative Strategy
Optimal medical therapy with cardiac catheterization and revascularization reserved for patients with acute coronary syndrome, ischemic heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest or refractory symptoms.
|
Behavioral: Lifestyle
diet, physical activity, smoking cessation
Other Name: Behavior change Drug: Medication antiplatelet, statin, other lipid lowering, antihypertensive, and anti-ischemic medical therapies
Other Name: Pharmacologic Therapy |
- Primary Composite Outcome: Death From Cardiovascular Causes, Myocardial Infarction, or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina, Heart Failure, or Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest [ Time Frame: 3.2 year follow-up (median) ]
- Cumulative Event Rate of Primary Composite Outcome (Death From Cardiovascular Causes, Myocardial Infarction, or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina, Heart Failure, or Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest) [ Time Frame: 5 years ]This measure represents the estimated cumulative probability of experiencing the primary endpoint within the indicated timeframe in each treatment group. The interpretation of the measure is similar to Kaplan-Meier event rates. Estimates are expressed as percentages ranging from 0% (endpoint is certain not to occur) to 100% (endpoint is certain to occur).
- Number of Participants That Experienced Death From Cardiovascular Causes or Myocardial Infarction [ Time Frame: 5 years ]
- Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Cardiovascular Causes or Myocardial Infarction [ Time Frame: 5 years ]This measure represents the estimated cumulative probability of experiencing Death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction within the indicated timeframe in each treatment group. The interpretation of the measure is similar to Kaplan-Meier event rates. Estimates are expressed as percentages ranging from 0% (endpoint is certain not to occur) to 100% (endpoint is certain to occur).
- Number of Participants That Experienced Death From Any Cause [ Time Frame: 5 years ]
- Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Any Cause [ Time Frame: 5 years ]
- Number of Participants That Experienced Myocardial Infarction [ Time Frame: 5 years ]
- Cumulative Event Rate of Myocardial Infarction [ Time Frame: 5 years ]
- Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate ( %) of Primary Composite Outcome: Invasive Minus Conservative [ Time Frame: 5 years ]The primary composite outcome includes death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest.
- Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Cardiovascular Causes: Invasive Minus Conservative or Myocardial Infarction Between Invasive and Conservative Strategies [ Time Frame: 5 years ]
- Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Any Cause: Invasive Minus Conservative [ Time Frame: 5 years ]
- Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate of Myocardial Infarction: Invasive Minus Conservative [ Time Frame: 5 years ]

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least moderate ischemia on a qualifying stress test
- Participant is willing to comply with all aspects of the protocol, including adherence to the assigned strategy, medical therapy and follow-up visits
- Participant is willing to give written informed consent
- Age ≥ 21 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- LVEF < 35%
- History of unprotected left main stenosis >50% on prior coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or prior cardiac catheterization (if available)
- Finding of "no obstructive CAD" (<50% stenosis in all major epicardial vessels) on prior CCTA or prior catheterization, performed within 12 months
- Coronary anatomy unsuitable for either PCI or CABG
- Unacceptable level of angina despite maximal medical therapy
- Very dissatisfied with medical management of angina
- History of noncompliance with medical therapy
- Acute coronary syndrome within the previous 2 months
- PCI within the previous 12 months
- Stroke within the previous 6 months or spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage at any time
- History of ventricular tachycardia requiring therapy for termination, or symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia not due to a transient reversible cause
- NYHA class III-IV heart failure at entry or hospitalization for exacerbation of chronic heart failure within the previous 6 months
- Non-ischemic dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- End stage renal disease on dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30mL/min (not an exclusion criterion for CKD ancillary trial, see CKD ancillary trial, Section 18)
- Severe valvular disease or valvular disease likely to require surgery or percutaneous valve replacement during the trial
- Allergy to radiographic contrast that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or any prior anaphylaxis to radiographic contrast
- Planned major surgery necessitating interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy (note that patients may be eligible after planned surgery)
- Life expectancy less than the duration of the trial due to non-cardiovascular comorbidity
- Pregnancy (known to be pregnant; to be confirmed before CCTA and/or randomization, if applicable)
- Patient who, in the judgment of the patient's physician, is likely to have significant unprotected left main stenosis (Those who are able to undergo CCTA will have visual assessment of the left main coronary artery by the CCTA core lab)
- Enrolled in a competing trial that involves a non-approved cardiac drug or device
- Inability to comply with the protocol
- Exceeds the weight or size limit for CCTA or cardiac catheterization at the site
- Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class III angina of recent onset, OR angina of any class with a rapidly progressive or accelerating pattern
- Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class IV angina, including unprovoked rest angina
- High risk of bleeding which would contraindicate the use of dual antiplatelet therapy
- Cardiac transplant recipient
- Prior CABG, unless CABG was performed more than 12 months ago, and coronary anatomy has been demonstrated to be suitable for PCI or repeat CABG to accomplish complete revascularization of ischemic areas (CCC approval required)

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01471522

Study Chair: | Judith S Hochman, MD | New York University | |
Principal Investigator: | David J Maron, MD | Stanford University |
Documents provided by NYU Langone Health:
Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: | NYU Langone Health |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01471522 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
11-00498 1U01HL105907 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
First Posted: | November 15, 2011 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | July 23, 2020 |
Last Update Posted: | June 1, 2023 |
Last Verified: | May 2023 |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
Plan to Share IPD: | Yes |
Plan Description: | Data will be submitted to the NHLBI according to their guidelines within 3 years after the final patient follow-up (June 30, 2019) or 2 years after the main paper of the trial has been published, whichever comes first. |
Supporting Materials: |
Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Clinical Study Report (CSR) Analytic Code |
Time Frame: | June 2022 |
Cardiovascular Diseases Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases |
Ischemia Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Pathologic Processes |