Simulation Training vs Workplace-Based Supervision in Psychiatry (EPIC-OSkER)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01416727|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified August 2011 by King's College London.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : August 15, 2011
Last Update Posted : September 7, 2011
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Clinical Skills Training||Other: Emergency Psychiatry Immersion Course Other: Observed SKills in the Emergency Room||Not Applicable|
Junior doctors starting work in psychiatry soon encounter a number of situations in the workplace for which they have had little or no preparation either at medical school or from work in other specialities. They will encounter clinically complex situations such as rapid tranquillisation, crisis presentations of self-harm, suicide risk assessment, overseeing supervised confinement and making decisions to admit or discharge mentally ill patients. Furthermore, many of these situations occur out of hours when there is little direct senior supervision available. The traditional induction programme is delivered in a didactic format, which does not encourage effective learning, nor does it allow any opportunity to practise or acquire hands-on skills or non-technical skills such as interprofessional communication, leadership and situational awareness. In the interests of patient safety and improving the quality of care and patient's experience, there is an urgent need to identify ways of improving induction and quickly equipping junior doctors with the clinical skills necessary to practise safely in psychiatry. We propose to evaluate and compare two approached to improved skills training in psychiatry: 1. workplace-based observation and feedback; 2. simulation training.
All new junior doctors starting work in the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, in August 2011 will be invited to take part in a randomised controlled trial of training in addition to the standard induction. Following a day of lectures on relevant clinical topics, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either observed workplace-based training by a more senior doctor during their on-call duties, or a two-day simulation-based training course. Before and after the training, assessments of participants' clinical skills and attitudes will be carried out by questionnaires and by observations of simulated clinical encounters. Changes in performance will be compared between the two groups. Longer term evaluation will be carried out by means of qualitative interviews and simulated clinical encounters once participants have been working for several months.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||48 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||A Randomised Trial of Simulation Training vs Workplace-Based Supervision for Junior Doctors in Psychiatry|
|Study Start Date :||August 2011|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||September 2011|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 2011|
"Observed SKills in the Emergency Room" - workplace-based supervision.
Other: Observed SKills in the Emergency Room
For four weeks, participants will be accompanied by a senior psychiatric registrar or consultant psychiatrist, who has received training in giving feedback, during their on-call duties. Each participant will receive between 8-12 hours of 1:1 training.
"Emergency Psychiatry Immersion Course" - simulation-based training.
Other: Emergency Psychiatry Immersion Course
A two-day simulation-based training course covering assessment of self-harm, capacity, managing aggression, working with the emergency team and medical emergencies in the psychiatric hospital
- Change in global clinical skills [ Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks ]Participants will participate in a single simulated clinical encounter. Encounters will be video-recorded and then rated by observers, who are blind to the allocation status and time point of each video, using a global rating scale.
- Change in technical clinical skills [ Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks ]Participants will participate in a single simulated clinical encounter. Encounters will be video-recorded and then rated by observers, who are blind to the allocation status and time point of each video, using a checklist-based rating scale.
- Change in attitudes towards teamworking [ Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks ]The Operating Room Management Attitudes Questionnaire will be modified to be appropriate for working in psychiatry.
- Change in attitudes towards self-harm [ Time Frame: Baseline; 4 weeks; 16 weeks ]The Attitudes to Deliberate Self-Harm Questionnaire
- Self-reported views on usefulness and acceptability of the training programmes [ Time Frame: 4 weeks ]Post-course feedback questionnaire
- Qualitative evaluation [ Time Frame: 8 - 12 weeks ]Focus groups will be conducted to evaluate how participants have learned to manage psychiatric emergencies, and the contribution of the courses to their learning.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01416727
|Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London|
|London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RJ|