Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy (PDP)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01162993|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified October 2016 by Maastricht University Medical Center.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : July 15, 2010
Last Update Posted : July 5, 2017
Rationale: Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications of Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Pain is a common symptom of diabetic neuropathy, affecting 11-34% of patients suffering form DM. The burden of disease of painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDP) is high for both the patient and society, due to significant pain levels, frequent co-morbidity, polypharmacy and significant health resource use. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for over 30 years to treat neuropathic pain. Several small clinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of SCS on pain in PDP.
Objective: The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether SCS leads to clinically relevant (≥50%) pain relief in patients with moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs after 6 months of treatment.
Secondary objectives to investigate 1) the effect of SCS on health related quality of life in PDP; 2) the effect of SCS on the quality of sleep in PDP; 3) the effect of SCS on mood in PDP; 4) the effect of SCS on blood glucose control in PDP; 5) the effect of SCS on large and small nerve fibre functions in PDP; 6) identifying predictive factors for success of SCS treatment of PDP; after 6 months 7) the effect of SCS on small fibre loss and regeneration in PDP; and 8) costs, cost-utility and cost-effectiveness after 12 months of treatment.
Study design: the study is a multi centre randomized controlled trial. Study population: Patients suffering from moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs due to diabetes mellitus type 1 or type 2 as diagnosed by clinical symptoms (glove and stocking distribution).
Intervention: patients assigned to group 1 will receive spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and/or best (drug) treatment as possible, patients assigned to group 2 will receive best (drug) treatment as possible.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter will be the mean pain intensity and/or maximal pain intensity during daytime and/or during night time as measured on a weighted NRS and/or a PGIC for pain and sleep measured on a 7-point Likert scale, after 6 months of treatment.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: SCS related risks include: lead migration (14%), lead breakage (7%), implanted pulse generator migration (1%), loss of therapeutic effect, lost or unpleasant paresthesias (12%), infection or wound breakdown (10%), Pain at IPG incision site (12%), IPG pocket fluid collection (5%). Treatment-as-usual related risks are related to the medication used and do not increase due to participation in this study.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Diabetic Neuropathies Pain Electric Stimulation Therapy||Procedure: Spinal Cord Stimulation||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy: a Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial (PDP Study)|
|Study Start Date :||April 2010|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||January 2013|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||January 2018|
Experimental: Spinal Cord Stimulation
Spinal cord stimulation
Procedure: Spinal Cord Stimulation
The intervention is spinal cord stimulation and will be used for 2 weeks trial stimulation. After clinical successful pain relief (≥50% relief of pain intensity on a weighted numeric rating scale (NRS) or a score of ≥6 on a seven-point Likert scale (1=very much worse; 7=very much improved) of the PGIC scale for pain and sleep) a definite spinal cord system will be implanted.
Other Name: Medtronic leads and neurostimulator (CE mark 0123)
No Intervention: Treatment as usual
Treatment as usual
- Pain intensity measured on a weighted NRS according to Jensen and a PGIC for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale. [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
- Effect SCS on health related quality of life, quality of sleep, mood, blood glucose control, large/small nerve fibre functions, predictive factors success of SCS treatment, small fibre loss/regeneration, cost-utility and cost-effectiveness [ Time Frame: 6 and 12 months and 5 year follow-up ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01162993
|UMC St. Radboud|
|Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands|
|Maastricht University Medical Center|
|Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands|
|Principal Investigator:||Maarten van Kleef, Prf. Dr.||Maastricht University Medical Center|