Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Exclusion (LapAorta)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00821145|
Recruitment Status : Withdrawn (inability to recruit sufficient number of patients)
First Posted : January 13, 2009
Last Update Posted : July 12, 2012
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Infra and Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms||Procedure: conventional surgery Procedure: laparoscopic AAA resection Procedure: laparoscopic stapler anastomosis||Phase 3|
In many countries the gold standard for treating abdominal aortic aneurysms is still open surgery with a long incision. In patients with suitable anatomy alternatively an endovascular approach can be chosen. Since open surgery is more durable in many countries a laparoscopic procedure using " key hole surgery " has gained wider acceptance. The current study wants to prove that laparoscopic aortic aneurysm procedures are less invasive than open surgery with reduced recovery times.
Study design: Multi center prospective randomized study including patients with infra or juxtarenal aortic aneurysms ( AAA).
In group I the AAA is resected using a conventional long incision and standard procedures for resecting the AAA. A Dacron graft is used in inlay technique to restore blood flow.
In group II a total laparoscopic approach is chosen to exclude the AAA. Identical to open surgery a dacron graft is laparoscopically sawn in to exclude the AAA and to restore blood flow.
In a subgroup II a the laparoscopic anastomosis is performed with a stapling device to simplify and to accelerate the procedure.
Endpoints of the study:
Total operating time, aortic crossclamping time, stay in ICU, return to a regular diet,postoperative ileus, total hospital stay, major and minor complications, blood loss, renal function in cases with juxtarenal AAA.Patients are evaluated for postoperative pain, wound related problems, hernias and time until full mobilisation is achieved.
Hypothesis: The laparoscopic approach though associated with a longer operating time and longer clamping times is associated with a reduced recovery time, les pain and less wound related problems compared to a full length conventional incision.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||0 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||Laparoscopic Aortic Resection Versus Open Surgery in Patients With AAA|
|Study Start Date :||January 2009|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||June 2010|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||June 2010|
Active Comparator: 1
50 patients operated using a conventional open surgery to exclude an abdominal aortic aneurysm
Procedure: conventional surgery
AAA patients operated using a conventional incision
50 patients operated using a total laparoscopic aortic aneurysm resection
Procedure: laparoscopic AAA resection
laparoscopic AAA resection
Active Comparator: 3
25 patients using a laparoscopic approach for AAA resection with a stapled proximal anastomosis
Procedure: laparoscopic stapler anastomosis
laparoscopic AAA resection, proximal anastomosis performed with a stapler
- All cause mortality, reduced recovery postoperatively according to pain measurement, ICU and hospital stay, minor and major complications [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
- Use of a stapling device reduces total operative time and crossclamping period [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00821145
|Principal Investigator:||Ralf R Kolvenbach, M.D.PhD||Augusta Hospital Duesseldorf|