Working… Menu

Comparison of the Efficiency of Mouth-to-nose Breathing With Mouth-to-mouth Breathing

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT00785447
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 5, 2008
Last Update Posted : April 25, 2012
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Robert M. Kacmarek, Massachusetts General Hospital

Brief Summary:

The purpose of this study is to find out the best way of providing artificial breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current standard CPR involves giving mouth-to-mouth breathing to people requiring CPR. The rescuer pinches the person's nostrils closed and breathes into the mouth of the unconscious person with his or her own mouth.

Some CPR studies have shown that it might be easier and more effective to breathe air into a person's nose instead of the mouth. People receiving CPR often have blocked airways, so breathing into the mouth does not always work.

We think mouth-to-nose breathing may be more efficient and easier to do. In this case, the rescuer closes the person's mouth by pushing the jaw up and holding it still. Then the rescuer breathes into the unconscious person's nose by covering the nose entirely with his or her mouth. We are doing this study to try to find out which way works better.

We will perform both ways of breathing on people who are unconscious (asleep) before planned (non-emergency) surgery and compare their effectiveness.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Respiratory Physiology Other: Mouth-to-mouth or mouth-to-nose breathing Not Applicable

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 20 participants
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Comparison of the Efficiency of Mouth-to-nose Breathing With Mouth-to-mouth Breathing in Non-paralyzed Adult Patients Under General Anesthesia
Study Start Date : March 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date : January 2010
Actual Study Completion Date : January 2010

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: CPR

Arm Intervention/treatment
Twenty healthy subjects between 18 to 59 years of age meeting ASA I-II criteria, undergoing elective surgery, requiring general anesthesia and being able to breathe through both their nose and mouth.
Other: Mouth-to-mouth or mouth-to-nose breathing
Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia will be given mouth-to-mouth and mouth-to-nose breaths. The respiration process will be measured and recorded by the help of elastic bands put around the chest and abdomen. The efficiency of the breathing methods will be evaluated.

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Comparing CO2 elimination with mouth-to-nose versus mouth-to-mouth breathing in non-paralyzed adult patients under general anesthesia. [ Time Frame: 1.5 years ]

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 59 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy subjects between 18 to 59 years of age
  • meeting ASA I-II criteria
  • Undergoing elective surgery and requiring general anesthesia
  • Being able to breathe through both the nose and the mouth while awake

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with known infectious diseases, bacteria infections such as Neisseria meningitidis, upper respiratory tract infection (URI), bacterial pneumonia, etc. and patients with known HIV, HBV, HCV, or TB infection. Patients with broken oral mucosa or obvious sores.
  2. Patients with immunosuppression from radiotherapy, chemotherapy, etc.
  3. Patients with cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, cerebral vascular disease and ASA class III or greater risk for anesthesia as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists.
  4. Abnormal vital signs on the day of admission for surgery (HR, BP, room air oxygen saturation, EKG) that are not correctable with his or her routine medication or commonly used pre-operative medication.
  5. Ischemic heart disease with chest pain or arrhythmias, patients with a pacemaker or AICD device and patients with heart failure.
  6. Respiratory diseases, including subjects with COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, restrictive lung disease, pleural effusion, tracheal stenosis and tracheal malacia, respiratory tract infection within the preceding week and those with previous pneumonectomy, lobectomy, tracheostomy, laryngectomy, tongue resection, and pharyngeal laryngeal plasity.
  7. Unable to open mouth (<2.5 cm) or unable to breathe through mouth or nose.
  8. Anticipated difficult airway: Mallampati score of III or greater, decreased neck movement, decreased mandibular movement, history of therapeutic radiation to the larynx or neck, prominent incisors. Subjects require or may require fiberoptic intubation
  9. Important nasal septum deviation or other conditions impairing nasal breathing. The patient's nasal patency will be confirmed by inspiring with the mouth shut and open.
  10. Gastric-esophageal reflex or a full stomach.
  11. Obese with BMI greater than 35.
  12. Neurological symptoms associated with neck extension, neurological deficit from previous stroke or spinal cord injury, recent stroke or TIA within 2 weeks.
  13. Pregnant women and women less than one month post-partum. Ruling out pregnancy will be conducted by careful history and physical examination as done routinely prior to a surgery. If the history is believed to be unreliable, the patient will be excluded unless a pregnancy test is performed and the result of the test is negative.
  14. Emergency cases, and subjects who have not adhered to the ASA NPO guidelines.
  15. Prisoners.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT00785447

Layout table for location information
United States, Massachusetts
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
Sponsors and Collaborators
Massachusetts General Hospital
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Yandong Jiang, MD, PhD Massachusetts General Hospital

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Robert M. Kacmarek, Professor of Anesthesia, Director of Respiratory Care Services, Massachusetts General Hospital Identifier: NCT00785447     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 2007-P-001680
First Posted: November 5, 2008    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: April 25, 2012
Last Verified: April 2012
Keywords provided by Robert M. Kacmarek, Massachusetts General Hospital:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Respiratory Physiology
Mouth to mouth ventilation
Mouth to nose ventilation
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Respiratory Aspiration
Mouth Breathing
Respiration Disorders
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Pathologic Processes
Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
Signs and Symptoms
Central Nervous System Depressants
Physiological Effects of Drugs