Comparison of the Efficiency of Mouth-to-nose Breathing With Mouth-to-mouth Breathing
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00785447|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 5, 2008
Last Update Posted : April 25, 2012
The purpose of this study is to find out the best way of providing artificial breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current standard CPR involves giving mouth-to-mouth breathing to people requiring CPR. The rescuer pinches the person's nostrils closed and breathes into the mouth of the unconscious person with his or her own mouth.
Some CPR studies have shown that it might be easier and more effective to breathe air into a person's nose instead of the mouth. People receiving CPR often have blocked airways, so breathing into the mouth does not always work.
We think mouth-to-nose breathing may be more efficient and easier to do. In this case, the rescuer closes the person's mouth by pushing the jaw up and holding it still. Then the rescuer breathes into the unconscious person's nose by covering the nose entirely with his or her mouth. We are doing this study to try to find out which way works better.
We will perform both ways of breathing on people who are unconscious (asleep) before planned (non-emergency) surgery and compare their effectiveness.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Respiratory Physiology||Other: Mouth-to-mouth or mouth-to-nose breathing||Not Applicable|
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||20 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Comparison of the Efficiency of Mouth-to-nose Breathing With Mouth-to-mouth Breathing in Non-paralyzed Adult Patients Under General Anesthesia|
|Study Start Date :||March 2008|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||January 2010|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||January 2010|
Twenty healthy subjects between 18 to 59 years of age meeting ASA I-II criteria, undergoing elective surgery, requiring general anesthesia and being able to breathe through both their nose and mouth.
Other: Mouth-to-mouth or mouth-to-nose breathing
Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia will be given mouth-to-mouth and mouth-to-nose breaths. The respiration process will be measured and recorded by the help of elastic bands put around the chest and abdomen. The efficiency of the breathing methods will be evaluated.
- Comparing CO2 elimination with mouth-to-nose versus mouth-to-mouth breathing in non-paralyzed adult patients under general anesthesia. [ Time Frame: 1.5 years ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00785447
|United States, Massachusetts|
|Massachusetts General Hospital|
|Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114|
|Principal Investigator:||Yandong Jiang, MD, PhD||Massachusetts General Hospital|