Working… Menu

Study to Evaluate Two Formulations of Carisoprodol in Subjects With Musculoskeletal Spasm of the Lower Back

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT00671879
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : May 5, 2008
Results First Posted : November 21, 2012
Last Update Posted : November 21, 2012
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Meda Pharmaceuticals

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine if two sustained released formulations of carisoprodol are more effective than placebo.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Lower Back Pain Drug: Carisoprodol SR 700 mg Drug: Carisoprodol SR 500 mg Drug: Placebo Phase 3

Detailed Description:


This will be a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in subjects 18-70 years of age with acute, painful, muscle spasm of the lower back. The study consists of a baseline screening (Study Day 1), during which subjects will be evaluated for inclusion/exclusion criteria, and a 7-day double-blind treatment period (Study Day 1 through Study Day 7). Subjects will be randomly assigned to be dosed twice daily with one of the following double-blind treatments: SR carisoprodol 500-mg tablets, SR carisoprodol 700-mg tablets, or placebo.

Subjects will be evaluated in the clinic on Study Days 1, 3 and 7. Subjects who remain symptomatic on Study Day 7 will be allowed to continue in the study for a 7-day, double-blind extension period at the discretion of the Investigator. Subjects will be contacted by telephone for a safety follow-up 7 days after the last dose of study medication.

A pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy will be conducted at selected sites. These sites will obtain blood samples for PK analysis at the end of the 7-day treatment period and the 14-day treatment period, if applicable.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 830 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial of Two Sustained Release Formulations of Carisoprodol Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Acute, Painful, Musculoskeletal Spasm of the Lower Back
Study Start Date : April 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date : March 2009
Actual Study Completion Date : March 2009

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Back Pain

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Carisprodol SR 700 mg
Carisoprodol 700 mg twice daily
Drug: Carisoprodol SR 700 mg
700 mg twice daily tablet
Other Name: no other name

Experimental: Carisoprodol SR 500mg
Carisoprodol SR 500 mg twice daily
Drug: Carisoprodol SR 500 mg
carisoprodol SR 500 mg tablet
Other Name: no other name

Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
placebo tablet
Other Name: no other name

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Subject Rated Change Relief From Starting Backache of Pain on a 100-point Visual Analog Scale [ Time Frame: baseline to 14 days ]
    on a visual analog scale of 0 to 100 millimeters(mm) with 0 being no pain and 100 being maximum pain By measuring the amount of pain before and during treatment done at each visit and recording the difference in mm.During treatment scores were averaged and this average was compared to the baseline value.

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Subject Functional Assessment Based on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) [ Time Frame: baseline and day +14 ]
    Subject functional assessment based on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)at day 14.Subjects were asked to read a list of 24 sentences that people have used to describe themselves when they had back pain, and were asked to mark those statements that described their condition that day. The number of marked statements was added. A decrease in the number of marked statements from baseline represented improvement on the RMDQ.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 70 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Onset of pain is within 3 days of first visit
  • Subject rating of pain must be 40 mm or greater on VAS
  • Ability to discontinue all analgesics, NSAIDs, and other muscle relaxants
  • Willingness to provide written informed consent
  • Must be in generally good health

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of sciatic pain
  • History of clinically significant spine pathology such as herniated nucleus pulpous, spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis
  • Presence of underlying chronic back pain
  • Neurological signs and symptoms such as numbness, tingling, foot drop, paresthesia, unexplained constipation, urinary retention or urinary incontinence
  • Myocardial infarction within one year of study
  • Cancer not in remission or in remission less than one year
  • HIV or other immunodeficiency syndromes
  • History of osteoporosis or at high risk for vertebral fracture
  • Underlying rheumatologic disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, etc.
  • Presence of active influenza or other viral syndromes
  • Morbid obesity (BMI >39)
  • Evidence of infection, such as low grade fever or neutrophilia
  • Existence of any medical/surgical condition that could interfere with the evaluation of the study medication
  • Known history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Injury involving high potential for litigation, including worker's compensation or automobile accidents
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Women of child-bearing potential not abstinent or not practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception
  • Vertebral body or spinous process, percussive tenderness on physical exam
  • Any abnormalities in the following tests of both lower extremities: ankle dorsiflexion strength, great toe dorsiflexion strength, absent or hyperreflexic Achilles or patellar tendor reflexes, abnormal sensory exam in the medial, dorsal or lateral aspect of the foot and positive straight leg raise test
  • Urgent medical conditions on comprehensive exam that might indicate a more serious condition should be treated urgently

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT00671879

Show Show 73 study locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Meda Pharmaceuticals
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Lewis M. Fredane, MD Meda Pharmaceuticals
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Meda Pharmaceuticals Identifier: NCT00671879    
Other Study ID Numbers: MP511
First Posted: May 5, 2008    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: November 21, 2012
Last Update Posted: November 21, 2012
Last Verified: October 2012
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Low Back Pain
Back Pain
Neurologic Manifestations
Muscle Relaxants, Central
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Neuromuscular Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents