The Zeaxanthin and Visual Function Study (ZVF)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00564902 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : November 29, 2007
Results First Posted : March 29, 2012
Last Update Posted : March 29, 2012
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Age Related Macular Degeneration Cognition Disorders | Drug: 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin Dietary Supplement: Lutein Dietary Supplement: Lutein and Zeaxanthin | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 60 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
Primary Purpose: | Supportive Care |
Official Title: | Randomized, Double Blind, Lutein Controlled Study of Zeaxanthin and Visual Function in Atrophic Age Related Macular Degeneration Patients |
Study Start Date : | November 2007 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 2009 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | June 2009 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Lutein
9 mg of Lutein for 12 months
|
Dietary Supplement: Lutein
9 mg of Lutein during 12 months |
Active Comparator: Zeaxanthin and Lutein
3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months
|
Dietary Supplement: Lutein and Zeaxanthin
8 mg of lutein and 8 mg of Zeaxanthin administered during 12 months |
Active Comparator: Zeaxanthin
3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
|
Drug: 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin
8 mg per day during 12 months
Other Name: EZEyes |
- Macular Pigment Optical Density [ Time Frame: 4 months ]Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).
- Macular Pigment Optical Density [ Time Frame: 8 months ]Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).
- Macular Pigment Optical Density [ Time Frame: 12 months ]Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering light emitting diodes and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated.
- SHAPE Discrimination [ Time Frame: 12 months ]We determined the target deformation detection thresholds, or amplitude of the minimum detectable distortion of a 1 degree foveal circular target. The peak spatial frequency of RF (radial frequency) patterns was 5 cyc/deg; the radial modulation frequency was 8 cyc/360°; mean radii were 0.5°, 1°, 2.0°, or 2.5°; and stimulus contrast was 80%. The highest % modulation score possible is 0.13 while the easiest (lowest score) was 10% modulation.
- Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity [ Time Frame: 12 months ]Black and 10% contrast near reading visual acuity was assessed with a Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Reading Card with LogMAR letters (#4031, Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois). We determined single letter acuity on an ordinal VAS (Visual Acuity Scale). The largest letters were 0.05 LogMAR with a VAS = 35 while the most difficult smallest letters were LogMar 1.25 or VAS 105. The test card was held at 40 cm with best monocular refraction, and both low and high contrast letter acuity were assessed.
- Glare Recovery [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]Photostress glare recovery test involves exposing an individual eye to intense light, or retinal bleach, for a set duration of time and measuring the time taken for visual acuity to recover to a predetermined level. Glare photo-stress recovery (in seconds) following 30 seconds of continuous retinal bleach, was assessed using 2 line supra-threshold low contrast randomly presented Landolt Cs using the KOWA AS14B Night Vision Tester (KOWA Optimed, Tokyo, Japan).
- Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]Distance photopic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 & 20 cc/deg) was determined with the Functional Vision Analyzer® (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, IL). Contrast sensitivity readings are shown as a curve. Visual acuity is plotted along the horizontal axis and contrast sensitivity along the vertical axis. Among the normally sighted people, both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity have a wide range of variation.Low population CSF is 0-200 units; normal population CSF is 200-300 units and suprathreshold CSF is 300+ units.
- 6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold [ Time Frame: 12 months ]The ChromaTest© is a computerized psychophysical test of protan and tritan color thresholds against age-corrected data. The computer finds the endpoint of the test by a Modified Binary Search method; if response is correct, on the next presentation the color difference between letter and background is halved. If response is incorrect, the color -contrast is doubled. Incorrect responses prolong the test, but do not influence the final threshold. This method of determining thresholds leads to finite steps which reach a plateau at the color contrast sensitivity threshold.
- 100% Kinetic Field [ Time Frame: 12 Months ]Scotomas within the central 20 degree central macula visual field sensitivity was assessed at 5 contrast levels (20, 40, 60, 80, and full contrast). A yellow wavelength stimulus avoided confounding by the lens. Subjects outlined the boundaries of their scotoma(s) on an area-integrating and recording touch flat- screen RGB monitor displaying a central fixation point and movable horizontal/vertical raster lines. The computer calculated summed area of the scotoma(s) with arbitrary scaling from 6000 (dense scotoma) to 0 relative units (absence of scotoma).

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 45 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of atrophic AMD (ICD9 362.51) by stereo bio-ophthalmoscopy and at least one vision degrading visual-psychophysical abnormality associated with AMD in one or both eyes.
- clear non-lenticular ocular media (cornea, aqueous and vitreous)
- free of advanced glaucoma and diabetes or any other ocular or systemic disease that could affect central or parafoveal macula visual function
Exclusion Criteria:
- high risk retinal characteristics for advanced AMD or advanced AMD for which existing medical / surgical options are available
- presence of ophthalmologically significant active exudative, AMD pathology by fluorescein angiography but also a single large drusen, >15, multiple intermediate drusen, parafoveal geographic atrophy or loss of vision in one eye due to advanced AMD
- recent (within 6 months) cataract or retinal surgery
- taking photosensitizing drugs such as phenothiazines and chloroquine
- having taken lutein or zeaxanthin supplements within the past six months.

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00564902
United States, Illinois | |
North Chicago VA Medical Center | |
North Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60064 |
Principal Investigator: | Stuart Richer, Ph. D. | North Chicago VA Medical Center | |
Study Director: | William Stiles, M.D. | North Chicago VA Medical Center |
Responsible Party: | Chrysantis, Inc. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00564902 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
CHRY1 IRB 07-046 ( Other Identifier: Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital/North Chicago VAMC ) |
First Posted: | November 29, 2007 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | March 29, 2012 |
Last Update Posted: | March 29, 2012 |
Last Verified: | March 2012 |
Macular Pigment Optical Density Skin Carotenoids Lipofuscin Photostress (Glare Recovery) |
Visual Field Progression Contrast Sensitivity Color Vision Cognitive Function |
Macular Degeneration Cognition Disorders Retinal Degeneration Retinal Diseases |
Eye Diseases Neurocognitive Disorders Mental Disorders |