Safety and Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Patients With Painful Artificial Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00403273|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 23, 2006
Results First Posted : November 18, 2016
Last Update Posted : November 18, 2016
Primary Total Knee joint replacement surgery is highly successful surgery for relieving pain and improving function in patients with disabling arthritis. Unfortunately, like all biomedical devices, prosthesis failure is a complication of knee replacement surgery that leads to disabling pain, stiffness and loss of function. Approximately 1% of the knee replacements fail every year leading to a 20% failure rate over 20 years. The common causes of failure of prosthetic joint are infection, loosening, trauma or wear of the prosthesis. Currently, a revision surgery is the best option for long term pain relief (analgesics or other pain medications are options but are of limited benefit). Surgery may not be feasible in patients due to advancing age, other medical conditions and surgical/technical difficulties or patient's choice. In addition, the results from revision surgery are not as good as the initial knee joint surgery. Therefore, there is a great need for a novel, targeted therapy that provides an option to patients who are unfit, unable, or unwilling to undergo surgery.
In the investigators' recent pilot study, a single injection of Botulinum toxin A (Botox) in painful natural knee, ankle and shoulder joints of patients with various types of arthritis led to significant and durable improvement in pain and function and was safe to use. The investigators propose this 6-month study to compare pain relief, improvement of function and safety of an injection of Botulinum toxin compared to placebo in patients with a painful prosthetic knee joint. Both patients and investigators will be blinded to the treatment assignment to a patient until the study is completed. The investigators will assess the amount and duration of pain relief, improvement in function and short term safety of Botulinum toxin using standard validated measures. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 6-months after a single injection of either placebo or BoNT/A in the hip or knee prosthesis. The six-month follow-up is to assess the duration of meaningful pain relief. If successful, this will offer a new treatment option for patients with a chronically painful knee prosthetic joint, provide more insight into the origin and cause of pain in prosthetic joints and direct future investigations in new directions.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Knee Pain||Drug: Botulinum toxin A Drug: Normal Saline||Phase 2|
"This 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial will compare a single intra-articular (IA) injection of 100 units of Botulinum Toxin A (BoNT/A) to placebo for improvement in pain, function and quality of life (QOL), and safety in patients with painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients will be recruited at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center. Patients will be eligible if they are over age 18, have TKA, have pain ≥6/10 on 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) and are not candidates for revision surgery.
The primary outcome is: (1) proportion with clinically meaningful change in pain severity (on 0-10 scale) 2 months after IA injection. The choice of 2-month for primary end-point is based on previous observations from open-label case series in painful TKA. Secondary outcomes will be assessed at each efficacy follow-up (FU) visit. The duration of the trial is 6-months to capture the duration of pain relief. Based on other trials of Botulinum toxin, we expect the peak effect between 2-8 weeks and expect the effect to wear off between 2-4 months. Therefore, for all analyses except duration of pain relief, the efficacy time-points (2 wk, 4 wk, 2 month) and possibly 3- or 4-month (depending on duration of pain relief) will be used. Secondary outcomes include: (1) clinically meaningful pain relief (≥2-point or ≥30% decrease) in pain severity (0-10 scale); (2) change in pain severity at 2 months and at all efficacy time-points; (3) percent with Minimal Clinically Important Improvement on Western Ontario MacMaster Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function sub-scales at 2 months and at all efficacy time-points; (4) amount and duration of pain relief; (5) patient and physician global assessment of response at 2 months and at all efficacy time-points; (6) QOL assessed by WOMAC and Short-form 36 (SF-36) scores at 2 months and at all efficacy time-points; (7) change in function by Timed Stands Test (TST) and Timed-up-and-go (TUG) tests at 2 months and at all efficacy time-points; (8) change in dose of analgesics during the study. We will determine time to onset of and duration of pain relief and time to improvement in function. Safety will be assessed by structured interview form for adverse effects, sensory and manual muscle strength testing, and index joint examination for swelling, erythema and tenderness.
At visit #1, after informed consent and screening for inclusion/exclusion criteria, patients will undergo: index joint X-ray, laboratory tests; history, physical examination, index joint pain history, comorbidity and medication history; patient pain assessments, WOMAC and SF-36; and blinded index joint, neurological examination, TST and TUG tests. 50 patients will be randomized to receive either IA BoNT/A 100 units or sterile saline in the index joint. FU phone interviews at 2 and 4-weeks will include pain assessments, WOMAC, patients' global assessment and adverse effects. Interim visits at 2, 3 and 4-months will be identical to visit #1, but will also include patients' and physicians' global assessment and there will be no joint injection. End of study visit at 6 months will be identical to interim visits with the addition of index joint X-ray and laboratory tests.
Main analyses will include patients with unilateral TKAs. Sensitivity analyses will be done by including patients with bilateral knees, accounting for correlatedness of observations. Multiple analysis of variance, mixed model regression analyses and/or generalized estimating equations will be used for analysis of continuous and categorical outcomes respectively. Chi-square tests will be used to compare frequency of adverse events. Analysis will be intention-to-treat.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||54 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Botulinum Toxin A for Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): Randomized, Controlled, Triple-blind Study|
|Study Start Date :||July 2006|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||January 2009|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||January 2009|
Single Intra-articular Injection of 100 units of Botulinum toxin A in 5 cc of normal saline in the Painful TKA at screening visit
Drug: Botulinum toxin A
100 units of Botulinum toxin A in 5 cc of normal saline in the Painful TKA at screening visit
Other Name: Botox
Placebo Comparator: B
Single Intra-articular Injection of 5 cc of normal saline in the Painful TKA at screening visit
Drug: Normal Saline
Single Intra-articular Injection of 5 cc of normal saline in the Painful TKA at screening visit
Other Name: saline control
- Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Pain Severity (0-10 cm; Higher Score on Pain Scale is Worse) [ Time Frame: 2-month post-injection ]2-point reduction in pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline to the 2-month follow-up visit, which is considered clinically meaningful Change in Pain Severity; Pain Severity on VAS ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
- Mean Pain VAS (0-10) [ Time Frame: 2-months post-injection ]VAS pain score at 2-month post-injection; Pain Severity on VAS ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain) with higher score indicating worse pain
- Physician Global Assessment of Response to Treatment [ Time Frame: 2-month (primary end-point) ]Physician global assessed on an ordinal scale with very much improved category as the outcome of interest (compared to all other categories of global assessment as reference category)
- Physical Function Subscale of the WOMAC at 2-months [ Time Frame: 2-month ]Physical Function subscale score of the WOMAC at 2-months on a 0 (best physical function) to 100 (worst physical function), with higher score indicating worse physical function
- WOMAC Stiffness (0-100) [ Time Frame: 2-months ]WOMAC stiffness subscale score on 0-100 scale at 2-month follow-up visit with scores ranging 0 (no joint stiffness) to 100 (worst joint stiffness), with higher score indicating worse joint stiffness
- Timed Up-and-go (TUG) Test [ Time Frame: 2-month ]Time to get up from a chair, walk 3 meters turn back and sit in the chair in seconds at the 2-month visit (higher number is worse, i.e., taking a longer time to complete the task is worse)
- QOL: SF-36 Score Physical Functioning Scale, a Generic Health Status Measure [ Time Frame: 2-month ]Short Form (SF)-36 physical functioning subscale on 0-100, at 2-month FU visit, as a generic health status measure, with a score ranging from 0 (worst physical functioning) to 100 (best physical functioning), with higher score indicating better physical functioning (higher number is better)
- Number of Participants With Occurrence of Joint Erythema, Warmth, Swelling or Tenderness [ Time Frame: Upto 6 months ]Occurence of any of the above clinical features (erythema, warmth, swelling or tenderness) as a new finding compared to the absence of the same feature at baseline
- Manual Muscle Strength Testing of Knee Flexion and Extension [ Time Frame: Upto 6-months ]Occurence of decrease in strength of knee flexion or extension at any of the follow-up visits, as measured by the Manual muscle strength testing (MMT) with scores ranging 0-5; 0 indicates None: No visible or palpable contraction; 1 indicates Trace: Visible or palpable contraction with no motion; 2 indicates Poor: Full range of motion (ROM) gravity eliminated; 3 indicates Fair: Full ROM against gravity; 4 indicates Good: Full ROM against gravity, moderate resistance; and 5 indicates Normal: Full ROM against gravity, maximal resistance
- McGill Affective Dimension [ Time Frame: 2-month ]McGill Affective Dimension Score on 0-12 scale at 2-months (higher number is worse)
- Correlation of Baseline Joint Fluid Cytokine Levels With Baseline Pain [ Time Frame: Baseline values ]Baseline pain on the WOMAC pain subscale score (range 0-100; higher number is worse)
- Correlation of Change in Joint Fluid Cytokine Levels With Improvement in Pain [ Time Frame: Baseline to 2-months ]Change in pain on WOMAC pain subscale score (range 0-100; higher number is worse); sensitivity analyses change in numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score (range 0-100; higher number is worse)
- McGill Sensory Pain Score [ Time Frame: 2-month ]McGill Sensory pain score on 0-33 at 2-month FU visit (higher score is worse)
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00403273
|United States, Minnesota|
|Minneapolis VA Medical Center|
|Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417|
|Principal Investigator:||Jasvinder Singh, MBBS, MPH||Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center|