Therapy With Verapamil or Carvedilol in Chronic Heart Failure
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government.
Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00374465
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified September 2006 by Medical University of Silesia. Recruitment status was: Recruiting
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of treatment with verapamil or carvedilol on long-term outcomes in stable, chronic heart failure secondary to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Condition or disease
Drug: VerapamilDrug: Carvedilol
Heart failure, irrespective of its etiology may be viewed as a progressive disorder initiated by a different events and sustained by a multifaceted pathophysiological mechanisms. Regardless of the nature of the initiating events and optimized therapy used, loss of functioning cardiac myocytes developed and the disease progressed. One potential explanation for such progression is that not all pathological mechanisms underlying the disease are antagonized enough by currently used therapeutic strategy. Accordingly, impaired myocardial perfusion secondary to microvascular dysfunction has been postulated to play a major role in the progression of heart failure despite standard therapy for heart failure. It has been hypothesized that diffuse subendocardial ischemia due to altered coronary physiology may contribute to the global cardiac dysfunction seen in heart failure patients. Accordingly, coronary endothelial dysfunction at the microvascular and epicardial level in patients with acute-onset idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and chronic congestive heart failure has been reported. Thus, taking all mentioned above into account, the improvement in endothelial function and diminishing of subendocardial ischemia with calcium antagonists may be promising in terms of using these drugs for therapy of patients with stable chronic heart failure. The previous randomized study (5) and our long-term pilot study support this point of view.
Sserum level of NT-proBNP,LVEF, LV diameters, exercise capacity (NYHA, V02,6 min walking test, changes in quality of life (MLHFQ).
In addition to secondary endpoints efficacy, patients will be classified as improved if they meet an increase of > 10 percentage points in the absolute EF and decrease in NT-proBNP levels at least 50% as compared with baseline study.
Secondary Outcome Measures :
Combined: mortality, heart transplantation, and readmission to hospital due to heart failure progression
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Chronic heart failure (NYHA II and III; LV ejection fraction, ≤ 35%) secondary to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
Stable condition at least 6 months before enrollment on conventional therapy (beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and diuretics).
Improvement in clinical status on conventional therapy in out-patients period preceded hospitalization,
Any changes narrowing epicardial coronary arteries in coronary angiography,
Insulin dependent diabetes,
Valvular heart disease (except the relative mitral regurgitation),