Meniscal Repair: A Randomized Prospective Trial of FAST-FIX vs. Meniscal Suturing
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00284661 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : February 1, 2006
Last Update Posted : November 30, 2015
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Meniscal repair resulting in meniscal preservation is the most desirable treatment of a torn meniscus and is one of the most commonly performed arthroscopic procedures. The inside-out meniscal suturing technique allows precise placement of sutures under direct visualization and studies have reported excellent healing rates and low re-tear rates. However, complications associated with the use of the inside-out technique (injury to the knee's neurovascular structures and infection) and the fact that it is a time consuming procedure have generated the development of alternative methods and devices. The FasT-Fix is reported to be quicker and safer. It is applicable to tears in most locations and requires no additional incisions or portals. Even though this and many similar devices are widely used with reported clinical healing rates of 75 -92% and relatively minor complications, few prospective, randomized clinical trials evaluating and comparing different techniques have been carried out. Patient outcome studies are necessary to evaluate which technique ultimately results in the most effective repair and the least patient disability following surgery.
We hypothesize that an inside-out suturing technique will have a higher complication rate but a significantly lower failure rate than the FasT-Fix Menisical Repair System
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Meniscal Tear | Procedure: FAST FIX Procedure: Meniscal suturing | Not Applicable |

Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 132 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Meniscal Repair: A Randomized Prospective Trial of FAST-FIX vs. Meniscal Suturing |
Study Start Date : | June 2005 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | June 2009 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | June 2009 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: FAST FIX
Inetrvention is Fast Fix repair of meniscal tear
|
Procedure: FAST FIX
Fast fix repair of a meniscal tear |
Experimental: Meniscal suturing
Intervention is Standard suturing of meniscal tear
|
Procedure: Meniscal suturing
standard suturing of meniscal tear |
- Quality of life at 2 years as measured by The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
- Side-to-side difference in knee joint range of motion [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
- Other physical symptoms such as joint line pain/tenderness, knee effusion [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
- Re-tear rate (as confirmed by MRI or arthroscopy), Functional outcome scores [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
- Surgical time [ Time Frame: day 0 ]
- Complication rate [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
- Differences between groups in post-operative pain [ Time Frame: 2 years ]

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 16 Years to 50 Years (Child, Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
-** Canadians Only can be recruited for this trial
- History indicative of meniscal pathology (i.e. pain, locking, clicking or giving way of the knee) +/- ACL insufficiency
- On physical exam, evidence of a meniscal tear (i.e. a locked joint, joint line tenderness and pain on meniscal compression +/- evidence of an ACL tear
- Vertical tears in the peripheral 0-5mm of the meniscus that are reducible
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intraarticular/Extraarticular knee infection
- Metabolic bone, collagen, crystalline joint or neoplastic disease
- Previous meniscal repair
- Meniscal tears that are in the avascular zone
- Stable meniscal tears, i.e. tears <10mm and displaced < 3mm, partial tears
- Radial, horizontal or flap tears
- Unwillingness to comply with the rehabilitation protocol or to be followed for 2 years
- Inability or unwillingness of subject /legal guardian to give written informed consent

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00284661
Canada, Ontario | |
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario | |
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 3K7 |
Principal Investigator: | Kevin Willits, MD | University of Western Ontario, Canada |
Responsible Party: | Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00284661 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
11125 R3773A01 ( Other Grant/Funding Number: Smith and Nephew ) |
First Posted: | February 1, 2006 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | November 30, 2015 |
Last Verified: | November 2015 |
Meniscal repair Meniscal suturing Meniscal tear |