Comparing Surgical to Conservative Management in the Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures Among the Elderly
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government.
Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00283998
Recruitment Status :
First Posted : January 31, 2006
Last Update Posted : March 26, 2014
AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation
AOSpine North America
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AO Innovation Translation Center ( AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation )
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of surgical versus conservative management of type II odontoid fractures among patients >/= 65 years of age. Of secondary interest is to determine if there are differences in outcomes between anterior screw fixation and posterior fusion of these fractures.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years and older (Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
All new type II odontoid fractures including < those in which the fracture line crosses into the body of C2 < as long as it doesn't enter the superior articular process of C2
Stable and unstable fractures
< 3 months postinjury
No previous treatment for an odontoid fracture
Pathologic fractures unrelated to osteoporosis
Severe dementia or other severe mental health problem if there is no consentable surrogate available
Participating in other trials or unlikely to attend follow-ups