Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules and Atrovent MDI in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00274092|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 10, 2006
Last Update Posted : November 5, 2013
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive||Drug: tiotropium inhalation capsules (18 mcg once daily) Drug: Atrovent MDI (2 puffs of 20 mcg(q.i.d.) in patients||Phase 3|
This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study to compare the bronchodilator efficacy and safety of tiotropium inhalation capsules and Atrovent MDI in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Following an initial screening visit, patients will enter a 2-week baseline period. Patients who successfully complete this phase will be randomized into the double-blind portion of the study in which they will receive tiotropium once daily (morning) or Atrovent four times daily. Pulmonary function testing will be conducted just prior to the start of therapy at Visit 2 (i.e. randomization visit after completion of the 2-week run-in period) and at 120 minutes post-dosing. Pulmonary function testing will be repeated at the same time intervals at the end of therapy.
Null and alternative hypotheses The primary objective of this study was addressed by a two-sided test at the 0.05 level of significance of the null hypothesis that, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the bronchodilator efficacy after one month is no greater on tiotropium inhalation capsules (18mcg once daily) than on ATROVENT MDI (2 puffs of 20 mcg q.i.d.), against the alternative hypothesis that the bronchodilator efficacy is greater on tiotropium inhalation capsules (18 mcg once daily).
Trough FEV1 response will be analyzed. Peak FEV1, FVC trough and peak response, number of Rescue Medication and change from baseline in total score of Patient Evaluation Questionnaire will be analyzed. Change from baseline in each category score of Patient Evaluation Questionnaire will be also analyzed.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||132 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Official Title:||A Comparison of 18 Mcg of Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules and Atrovent Metered Dose Inhaler (2 Puffs of 20 Mcg) in a Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Efficacy and Safety Study in Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)|
|Study Start Date :||September 2002|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||October 2003|
|Study Completion Date :||October 2003|
- The primary endpoint is trough FEV1 response which is defined as change from baseline FEV1 (visit 2) and trough FEV1 at week 4 (visit 4)
- FEV1 and FVC response at 2 hours post drug administration at on each pulmonary test day; Trough FVC response; Number of rescue medications; and Change from baseline in total score of patient evaluation questionnaire at week 4 (visit 4).
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00274092
|Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital|
|Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 813|
|Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital|
|Veterans General Hospital|
|Taichung, Taiwan, 407|
|National Taiwan University Hospital|
|Taipei, Taiwan, 100|
|Tri-Service General Hospital|
|Taipei, Taiwan, 114|
|Veterans General Hospital|
|Taipei, Taiwan, 12217|
|Study Chair:||Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator||B.I. Taiwan Ltd.|