Immediate Implant Placement in the Molar Regions
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00226148|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 26, 2005
Last Update Posted : September 10, 2009
The purpose of this study is to look at the bonehealing when a molar has been extracted and immediately replaced by an implant leaving some defects around the implant.
The defects are being treated in three different with the hypothesis that the three ways of treatment result in equal bonehealing.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Periodontitis Dental Caries Periapical Periodontitis||Procedure: Use of a membrane to cover bonedefects around implant Device: Use of bonechips to fill up defects around implant Procedure: Use of membrane and bonechips to manage defects||Early Phase 1|
This study is a randomized clinically controlled study with three group of each thirty patients, where the bonehealing after immediate implantplacement in molarregions is being investigated.
Totally 90 patients are going to get a molar tooth extracted and immediately replaced with an implant (Brånemark System, Wide Platform). The molar tooth should be in such a condition that is has to be extracted.
Extracting a molar leaves a defect which cannot completely be filled out by an implant. The 90 patients are therefore randomised into 3 groups according to how the perimarginal bonedefects around the placed implants are being treated: 1. Bonechips 2. Membrane 3. Bonechips+Membrane. The bonehealing of the defects around the implants are then compared the groups in between. The amount of newly formed bone is being estimated too by digital radiography and subtractionradiography. Furthermore the prognosis for immediate placed implants in molar regions in relation to the method of defectreconstruction one year after crown delivery is also being investigated. All the investigations are conducted with the Ho-hypothesis that there is no difference in the bonehealing the three groups in between.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||92 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Immediate Implant Placement in the Molar Regions|
|Study Start Date :||September 2005|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||September 2009|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||September 2009|
- Digitial radiography of the implants at placement, 3 month, 6 month, at abutmentoperation, at crownplacement, 3 month after crownplacement and 6 month after crownplacement. [ Time Frame: see above ]
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00226148
|The Royal Dental College of Aarhus|
|Aarhus, Denmark, DK-8000|
|Study Chair:||Ann Wenzel, Prof.Dr.Odont, Ph.d.,DDS||The Royal Dental College of Aarhus|