We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 1 of 303 for:    radial artery patency study
Previous Study | Return to List | Next Study

Multicentre Radial Artery Patency Study: Results of Patency Beyond 5 Years After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (RAPS - 5 years)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00187356
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : September 16, 2005
Last Update Posted : June 5, 2013
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Stephen E. Fremes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Brief Summary:
Bypass surgery is often required to treat severe coronary heart disease. Either arteries or veins can be used as bypass grafts. We wish to compare the long-term durability of the saphenous vein from the leg to that of the radial artery from the fore-arm when used as bypass grafts. We are examining how many of these grafts are still functioning beyond 5 years after bypass surgery by performing a coronary angiogram. After 1-year, we found that radial arteries were more likely to be functioning than saphenous veins. We hypothesize that radial arteries will continue to be superior beyond 5 years.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Coronary Artery Disease Procedure: Radial Artery and Saphenous Vein Grafts Randomized to either right coronary or left circumflex coronary artery territories Phase 3

Detailed Description:

The multi-centre Radial Artery Patency Study, (RAPS) is a series of longitudinal graft patency studies designed to compare the long-term patency of the radial artery to the saphenous vein. Between 1996 and 2001, 561 patients were intraoperatively randomized to undergo surgery according to one of two strategies: radial-artery grafting to the circumflex territory and saphenous-vein grafting to the right coronary artery or radial-artery grafting to the right coronary artery and saphenous-vein grafting to the circumflex territory. The first study compared the 8-12 month angiographic patency of the radial artery with that of the saphenous vein as a conduit for coronary artery bypass and found that radial arteries were superior. The primary objective of this current study is to determine the beyond 5-year angiographic patency of the radial artery compared with a saphenous vein coronary bypass graft.

HYPOTHESES

  1. The angiographic patency of radial artery grafts studied beyond 5 years following surgery exceeds that of saphenous vein grafts.
  2. Radial artery conduits studied beyond 5 years postoperatively have less graft disease than saphenous veins.

SAMPLE SIZE We expect to study 350 patients, which will allow us to test for a 35% risk reduction from 23% occlusion rate in saphenous veins to 15% in radial arteries, assuming a 5% within-patient correlation, with 80% power for a 2-tailed alpha of 0.05.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 269 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Multicentre Radial Artery Patency Study: Results of Patency Beyond 5 Years After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Study Start Date : July 2002
Actual Primary Completion Date : September 2010
Actual Study Completion Date : October 2010

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Surgical Conduit
The surgical arm will be composed of the experimental arm (the use of the radial artery) versus an active comparator (the use of the saphenous vein graft).
Procedure: Radial Artery and Saphenous Vein Grafts Randomized to either right coronary or left circumflex coronary artery territories
Each patient will receive both study grafts (Radial artery and Study Saphenous vein graft). The within-patient randomization scheme will dictate whether the radial goes to the right or circumflex territory. The saphenous vein graft will go to the opposing territory.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. The primary endpoint will be the proportion of grafts which are functionally occluded (TIMI flow 0, 1, or 2). [ Time Frame: Beyond 5 years after bypass urgery ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. a) the proportion of occluded study grafts (TIMI 0) [ Time Frame: Beyond 5 years after bypass urgery ]
  2. b) the proportion of functionally occluded grafts where proximal stenosis of native vessel is <90% vs >90% [ Time Frame: Beyond 5 years after bypass urgery ]
  3. c) the proportion of completely occluded grafts where proximal stenosis of native vessel is <90% vs >90% [ Time Frame: Beyond 5 years after bypass urgery ]
  4. d) proportion of study grafts with string sign [ Time Frame: Beyond 5 years after bypass urgery ]


Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   30 Years to 80 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

The patient population consists of patients who were enroled into the original Multicentre Radial Artery Patency Study between November 1996 and January 2001. These included patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery less than 80 years of age with 3 vessel coronary disease and left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria included 1: Inability to use the radial artery or saphenous vein conduits: a)nonpalpable ulnar arteries or a positive Allen's test, b) an abnormal Doppler study or ultrasonographic study of the arms, c) a history of vasculitis or Raynaud's syndrome, bilateral varicose veins or vein stripping. 2: Conditions that affected the safety of follow-up angiography: a)renal insufficiency (creatinine > 180 umol/L) b)severe peripheral vascular disease precluding femoral access b)coagulopathy or obligatory uninterrupted use of anticoagulants c) known allergy to radiographic contrast media d) women of childbearing potential e) comorbid illness which precludes the use of follow up angiography f) geographically inaccessible for follow up angiography.


Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00187356


Locations
Layout table for location information
Canada, Alberta
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
Canada, Manitoba
Manitoba Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1R9
Canada, Ontario
London Health Sciences Centre - UC
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
London Health Sciences Centre - VC
London, Ontario, Canada, N6B1B1
Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4W7
Sunnybrook and Women's College HSC
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N3M5
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B1W8
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G2C4
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, Ontario, Canada, V5Z1C6
Canada, Quebec
Laval Hospital
Laval, Quebec, Canada, G1V4G5
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8
Montreal Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
New Zealand
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, New Zealand
Sponsors and Collaborators
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Chair: Stephen E Fremes, MD Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Additional Information:
Publications of Results:
Other Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Stephen E. Fremes, Head, Division of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery and Dr. Bernard S. Goldman Chair in Cardiovascular Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00187356    
Other Study ID Numbers: CIHR MCT# 52681
First Posted: September 16, 2005    Key Record Dates
Last Update Posted: June 5, 2013
Last Verified: June 2013
Keywords provided by Stephen E. Fremes, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre:
Coronary Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease
Angiography
Arterial Grafts
Radial Artery
Saphenous Vein
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Coronary Artery Disease
Myocardial Ischemia
Coronary Disease
Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Arteriosclerosis
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Vascular Diseases