|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | Kirby Institute |
|---|---|
| Collaborators: |
Merck Abbott American Foundation for AIDS Research |
| Information provided by (Responsible Party): | Kirby Institute |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00931463 |
Purpose
The investigators hypothesize that following virological failure of a standard NNRTI+2N(T)RTI regimen second-line antiretroviral therapy consisting of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and 2N(T)RTIs will offer comparable efficacy to that provided by ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and raltegravir.
The study will be conducted for 96-weeks with the primary endpoint analyzed after 48-weeks.
The primary endpoint is virological: a comparison of virological suppression in plasma < 200 copies/mL between the randomized arms after 48 weeks.
Secondary and exploratory endpoints include virological, immunological, safety, clinical, metabolic, drug adherence, drug resistance and quality of life.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
HIV Infections |
Drug: Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and raltegravir Drug: Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and 2N(t)RTI |
Phase IV |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomised Open-label Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Ritonavir Boosted Lopinavir and 2-3N(t)RTI Backbone Versus Ritonavir Boosted Lopinavir and Raltegravir in Participants Virologically Failing First-line NNRTI/2N(t)RTI Therapy |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 550 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | August 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | September 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and 2N(t)RTI
This is the current standard of care for second line therapy following failure of standard first-line NNRTI+2N(t)RTIs according to WHO guidelines.
|
Drug: Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and 2N(t)RTI
Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir 2 heat-stable tablets taken every 12 hours and 2N(t)RTIs as prescribed
Other Name: nucleosides, nucleotides, nuncleoside backbone
|
|
Experimental: Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and raltegravir
This is an experimental arm which is likely to be fully active in the presence of N(t)RTI mutations and which preliminary evidence suggests should be potent and durable.
|
Drug: Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and raltegravir
Two heat-stable ritonavir-boosted lopinavir tablets and one 400 mg raltegravir tablet taken every 12 hours
Other Name: Kaletra, Aluvia, Isentress
|
In HIV-infected subjects who have virologically failed first-line antiretroviral therapy comprising 2N(t)RTI + NNRTI a regimen of second-line therapy incorporating ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and raltegravir provides comparable (i.e., non-inferior) antiretroviral efficacy over 48 weeks to a regimen containing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and 2-3N(t)RTIs.
Eligible patients will be randomised to one of two arms:
I. ritonavir boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) 200mg/50mg 4 tabs once daily or 2 tabs twice daily + 2-3N(t)RTIs
II. ritonavir boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) 200mg/50mg 4 tabs once daily or 2 tabs twice daily + raltegravir 400 mg twice daily
The primary objective of this study is to compare the virological efficacy of the two strategies as measured by the proportion of participants with HIV RNA < 200 copies/mL 48 weeks after randomisation.
Secondary objectives include virological, immunological, safety and antiretroviral therapy endpoints.
Exploratory endpoints include clinical, metabolic, drug resistance, medication adherence and quality of life endpoints.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 16 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
The following laboratory variables:
Contacts and Locations
Show 44 Study Locations| Study Chair: | David A Cooper, MD | Kirby Institute |
| Study Chair: | Brian Gazzard, MD | St. Stephen's Trust |
| Study Director: | Mark A Boyd, MD | Kirby Institute |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | Kirby Institute |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00931463 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SECOND-LINE |
| Study First Received: | July 1, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | August 29, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration; European Union: European Medicines Agency; Malaysia: Ministry of Health; Nigeria: The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control; Argentina: Administracion Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnologia Medica; Argentina: Human Research Bioethics Committee; Argentina: Ministry of Health; Chile: Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Chile: Instituto de Salud Publica de Chile; Mexico: Ethics Committee; Mexico: Federal Commission for Protection Against Health Risks; Peru: Ethics Committee; Peru: Ministry of Health |
|
second line therapy combination antiretroviral therapy first-line failure AIDS treatment experienced |
|
HIV Infections Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Lentivirus Infections Retroviridae Infections RNA Virus Infections Virus Diseases Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral Sexually Transmitted Diseases Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes Immune System Diseases Slow Virus Diseases Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Ritonavir |
Lopinavir Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Anti-Retroviral Agents Antiviral Agents Anti-Infective Agents Therapeutic Uses HIV Protease Inhibitors Protease Inhibitors Anti-HIV Agents |