|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | Biomet, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Information provided by (Responsible Party): | Biomet, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00763113 |
Purpose
Main Objectives are: Test Difference in terms of early ROM between Vanguard FB CR and Vanguard FB PS. Knees; Demonstrate the comparable ROM of high flex PS to CR.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Total Knee Arthroplasty |
Device: Vanguard PS Knee Device: Vanguard CR Knee |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Prospective Randomized Study on Vanguard Cruciate Retaining Versus Vanguard High Flex Posterior Stabilized Total Knee System in the Early Range of Motion |
| Enrollment: | 173 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2007 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | June 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Vanguard PS Knee
|
Device: Vanguard PS Knee
Vanguard PS Knee
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Vanguard CR Knee
|
Device: Vanguard CR Knee
Vanguard CR Knee
|
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Patients need total knee replacement
Contacts and Locations
More Information
| Responsible Party: | Biomet, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00763113 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | BMET CA 01 |
| Study First Received: | September 26, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | January 25, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |