|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | University of Sao Paulo |
|---|---|
| Information provided by: | University of Sao Paulo |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00474123 |
Purpose
Among patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), it is not clear if the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol reduction differ between high-dose simvastatin alone and combined ezetimibe/simvastatin.
The investigators sought to compare the anti-inflammatory and anti-platelet effects of ezetimibe 10 mg / simvastatin 20 mg (E10/S20) to simvastatin 80 mg (S80).
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Stable Angina |
Drug: Simvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks Drug: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of High Dose Statin Monotherapy Versus Moderate Dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe |
| Enrollment: | 78 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | August 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Simvastatin 80 mg
Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks
|
Drug: Simvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks
Simvastatin 80 mg/day, single dose, for 6 weeks.
Other Name: Simvastatin 80 mg (Zocor)
|
|
Active Comparator: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg
Patients were treated with daily Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks
|
Drug: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg
Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg Patients were treated with daily Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks Other Name: Vytorin
|
Introduction
Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), a robust evidence base supports the beneficial effects of statin therapy on mortality and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes . Recently, two large trials , have demonstrated that compared to standard dose statin therapy, high statin doses reduced Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) to extremely low levels and decreased coronary events, even in patients with normal levels of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C). Subsequently, recent guidelines have suggested an Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) treatment goal of <70 mg/dL in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Achieving such low Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) levels frequently demands an intensive Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) reduction, often above 50%. Ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, can be used as an additional therapy if statin monotherapy fails to reduce Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) below the treatment goal.
Furthermore, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic pleiotropic effects of statins might explain, at least in part, the large benefits demonstrated in randomized trials , . For example, in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with statins, a decrease in inflammation-associated markers such as the C-reactive protein (CRP) has been described , although it is debated whether this effect is clearly independent of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C).
Moreover, although inhibition of platelets by statin therapy is a well established effect , , it has not yet been clarified whether platelet inhibition by statin therapy depends on the reduction of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) or on the inhibition of intracellular signal pathways accompanied by disaggregating effects.
Two alternative pharmacologic strategies are equally effective in reducing Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C): high-dose statin alone and combined treatment with ezetimibe plus moderate-dose statin . It is not known whether these two strategies have different cholesterol-independent pleiotropic effects on inflammation and platelets. We therefore compared the anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet effects of two intensive pharmacologic strategies to reduce cholesterol: 80 mg of simvastatin (S80) versus 10 mg ezetimibe/ 20 mg of simvastatin (E10/S20). Anti-inflammatory effects were assessed by performing serial measurements of the following biomarkers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, oxidized Low-density lipoprotein-C (oxLDL), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1. Platelet aggregation was also compared between the two strategies.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| Brazil | |
| Heart Institute (InCor) HOSPITAL DAS CLINICAS DA FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO (HCFMUSP) | |
| Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05403-000 | |
| Principal Investigator: | CARLOS V SERRANO, PHD | Heart Institute (InCor) HOSPITAL DAS CLINICAS DA FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO (HCFMUSP) |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00474123 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 893/05 |
| Study First Received: | May 15, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | January 8, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | June 18, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Brazil: Ministry of Health |
|
angina atherosclerosis simvastatin ezetimibe inflammation |
|
Anti-Inflammatory Agents Simvastatin Ezetimibe Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Hypolipidemic Agents |
Antimetabolites Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Lipid Regulating Agents Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors Anticholesteremic Agents Enzyme Inhibitors |