Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Statins and Ezetimibe
This study has been completed.

First Received on May 15, 2007.   Last Updated on June 18, 2010   History of Changes
Sponsor: University of Sao Paulo
Information provided by: University of Sao Paulo
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00474123
  Purpose

Among patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), it is not clear if the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol reduction differ between high-dose simvastatin alone and combined ezetimibe/simvastatin.

The investigators sought to compare the anti-inflammatory and anti-platelet effects of ezetimibe 10 mg / simvastatin 20 mg (E10/S20) to simvastatin 80 mg (S80).


Condition Intervention
Stable Angina
Drug: Simvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks
Drug: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of High Dose Statin Monotherapy Versus Moderate Dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by University of Sao Paulo:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • C-reactive Protein [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Serum was separated by centrifugation from the blood samples. For high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein measurement, whole venous blood was collected in tubes without anticoagulant and centrifuged at room temperature. Serum C-Reactive Protein was assessed with a high-sensitivity, latex microparticle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Behring Nephelometer Analyzer System; Behring Diagnostics, Somerville, NJ).

  • Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting oxLDL (Mercodia, USA) were applied.

  • Platelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-100 [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Samples were collected in 3.8% sodium citrate (buffered, pH 5.5, Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, UK) for platelet function tests. Platelet function assays were processed within 2 hours of blood collection. The PFA-100 records the closure time (CT), witch means the time in seconds (s) from the start of the test until the platelet plug occludes the aperture.

  • Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1 [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK).

  • Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-1 [ Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK)

  • Soluble CD40 Ligand [ Time Frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    A commercial ELISA assay detecting sCD40L (R&D Systems, USA) was applied. Detection limits and intra-assay variability was respectively, as follows: sCD-40L 15.6 pg/mL (intra-assay variability not available).

  • Interleukin-6 [ Time Frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    A commercial ELISA assay detecting IL-6 (Siemens, USA) was applied.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • LDL Cholesterol [ Time Frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Triglyceride [ Time Frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Endothelial Progenitor Cells [ Time Frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Endothelial progenitor cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Selected cells were positive for CD31, CD34 and VEGFR receptors.


Enrollment: 78
Study Start Date: January 2006
Study Completion Date: August 2009
Primary Completion Date: January 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: Simvastatin 80 mg
Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks
Drug: Simvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks
Simvastatin 80 mg/day, single dose, for 6 weeks.
Other Name: Simvastatin 80 mg (Zocor)
Active Comparator: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg
Patients were treated with daily Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks
Drug: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg

Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg

Patients were treated with daily Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks

Other Name: Vytorin

Detailed Description:

Introduction

Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), a robust evidence base supports the beneficial effects of statin therapy on mortality and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes . Recently, two large trials , have demonstrated that compared to standard dose statin therapy, high statin doses reduced Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) to extremely low levels and decreased coronary events, even in patients with normal levels of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C). Subsequently, recent guidelines have suggested an Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) treatment goal of <70 mg/dL in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Achieving such low Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) levels frequently demands an intensive Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) reduction, often above 50%. Ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, can be used as an additional therapy if statin monotherapy fails to reduce Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) below the treatment goal.

Furthermore, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic pleiotropic effects of statins might explain, at least in part, the large benefits demonstrated in randomized trials , . For example, in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with statins, a decrease in inflammation-associated markers such as the C-reactive protein (CRP) has been described , although it is debated whether this effect is clearly independent of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C).

Moreover, although inhibition of platelets by statin therapy is a well established effect , , it has not yet been clarified whether platelet inhibition by statin therapy depends on the reduction of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) or on the inhibition of intracellular signal pathways accompanied by disaggregating effects.

Two alternative pharmacologic strategies are equally effective in reducing Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C): high-dose statin alone and combined treatment with ezetimibe plus moderate-dose statin . It is not known whether these two strategies have different cholesterol-independent pleiotropic effects on inflammation and platelets. We therefore compared the anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet effects of two intensive pharmacologic strategies to reduce cholesterol: 80 mg of simvastatin (S80) versus 10 mg ezetimibe/ 20 mg of simvastatin (E10/S20). Anti-inflammatory effects were assessed by performing serial measurements of the following biomarkers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, oxidized Low-density lipoprotein-C (oxLDL), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1. Platelet aggregation was also compared between the two strategies.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 80 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stable angina
  • Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 70-160 mg/dl

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Renal failure
  • Age>80
  • Simvastatin current treatment>20mg
  • Hepatic disease
  • Inflammatory diseases
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00474123

Locations
Brazil
Heart Institute (InCor) HOSPITAL DAS CLINICAS DA FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO (HCFMUSP)
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05403-000
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Sao Paulo
Investigators
Principal Investigator: CARLOS V SERRANO, PHD Heart Institute (InCor) HOSPITAL DAS CLINICAS DA FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO (HCFMUSP)
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00474123     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 893/05
Study First Received: May 15, 2007
Results First Received: January 8, 2010
Last Updated: June 18, 2010
Health Authority: Brazil: Ministry of Health

Keywords provided by University of Sao Paulo:
angina
atherosclerosis
simvastatin
ezetimibe
inflammation

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Simvastatin
Ezetimibe
Therapeutic Uses
Pharmacologic Actions
Hypolipidemic Agents
Antimetabolites
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Lipid Regulating Agents
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Anticholesteremic Agents
Enzyme Inhibitors

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 09, 2012