|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) |
|---|---|
| Information provided by (Responsible Party): | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00447265 |
Purpose
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem, autoimmune disease in which the body's immune system attacks its own normal tissues. This abnormal autoimmune response can result in damage to many parts of the body, including the skin, joints, lungs, heart, brain, intestines, and kidneys. Kidney problems occur in 60-75 % of lupus patients. The development of lupus-related kidney disease (called lupus nephritis) is associated with an overall worse prognosis.
SLE is usually treated with drugs that try to block inflammation caused by the immune system. These treatments can create their own problems and they do not cure lupus. The drugs that are often used to treat lupus nephritis include prednisone (steroids), cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan), azathioprine (AZA or Imuran), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF or Cellcept). The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of etanercept compared to placebo in combination with standard of care to treat individuals with active lupus nephritis.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Lupus Nephritis |
Drug: Etanercept Drug: Lupus Treatment Drug: Placebo |
Phase II |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II, Multi-Center Study for Treatment of Lupus Nephritis by Inhibition of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Using Etanercept |
Number of adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse events (SAEs) Grade 3 or higher experienced by participant over the duration of the treatment period. [1]
[1] This study graded the severity of AEs experienced by the study participant according to the criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0.
Percent of study participants who achieved a renal response at 24 weeks.[1]
[1]A renal response is defined as: 1) 50% reduction in proteinuria compared to baseline as measured by urinary protein: creatinine ratio; and 2) stable or improving renal function as defined by the Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated based on the "Modification of Diet in Renal Disease" equation (Levy, AS, Coresh J, Galk E et al, National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med, 139(2): 137-47, 2003)
Time to when participant achieved a renal response[1]
[1]A renal response is defined as: 1) 50% reduction in proteinuria compared to baseline as measured by urinary protein: creatinine ratio; and 2) stable or improving renal function as defined by the Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated based on the "Modification of Diet in Renal Disease" equation (Levy, AS, Coresh J, Galk E et al, National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med, 139(2): 137-47, 2003)
Reported here is the participant baseline and week 24 SF-36 Physical Component scores. The SF-36 measures 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, body pain, social functioning, mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perceptions[1]. The Physical Component scores of the SF-36 range from 0 to 100; 0 equals worst health state. Higher numbers reported here indicate more improvement in condition from baseline.
[1]Ref: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS36-item short-form health survey Med Care. 1992; 30:473-483.
Reported here are the participant SF-36 Mental Component scores at baseline and week 24. The SF-36 measures 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perceptions.[1] The Mental Component score of the SF-36 ranges from 0 to 100; 0 equals worst health state. Higher numbers reported here indicate more improvement in condition from baseline.
[1]Ref: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS36-item short-form health survey. Med Care. 1992; 30:473-483
| Enrollment: | 1 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Participants in this group will self-administer 50 mg etanercept injections once a week for 24 weeks. They will continue receiving their usual treatment with corticosteroids and either MMF, Mycophenolic Acid, or AZA.
|
Drug: Etanercept
TNF inhibitor that increased the number of reactive B and T cells
Drug: Lupus Treatment
Individualized standard of care treatment for lupus with corticosteroids and with MMF, Mycophenolic Acid, or AZA
|
|
Placebo Comparator: 2
Participants in this group will self-administer 50 mg placebo injections once a week for 24 weeks. They will continue receiving their usual treatment with corticosteroids and either MMF, Mycophenolic Acid, or AZA.
|
Drug: Lupus Treatment
Individualized standard of care treatment for lupus with corticosteroids and with MMF, Mycophenolic Acid, or AZA
Drug: Placebo
|
Kidney problems associated with lupus nephritis range from asymptomatic protein in the urine to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, leading to end-stage renal disease. The goal of therapies is to control kidney manifestations in order to avoid kidney failure, the occurrence of other medical problems and death.
The treatment of lupus nephritis remains problematic. Despite the use of currently available therapies, patients experience disease relapse. Over time, patients develop significant morbidity from the disease as well as from medications used for treatment.
Etanercept, a TNF inhibitor, is proposed as a potential treatment for lupus nephritis. TNF increases the number of reactive B and T cells. TNF levels can be elevated in lupus. Etanercept is believed to work by blocking inflammation, and it is hoped that it will lessen the signs and symptoms of lupus-related kidney disease.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of etanercept compared to placebo in combination with standard therapy to treat individuals with mild or moderately active lupus nephritis.
This study will last 1 year. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either etanercept or placebo in addition to their regular medications. Participants will self-administer 50 mg etanercept or placebo injections once a week. They will continue receiving their usual treatment with corticosteroids and either MMF, Mycophenolic Acid, or AZA. Treatment with study medication will occur for 24 weeks.
There will be a screening visit followed by a randomization visit, where subjects will receive and learn how to administer the study drug. Subjects will come to the clinic for 9 study visits. A physical exam and blood and urine collection will occur at most study visits. Participants will also be asked to complete a questionnaire on their health at most study visits. Subjects will be contacted by phone 5 times during the 24-week period to assess for adverse events and worsening disease status.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| United States, Alabama | |
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | |
| Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294 | |
| United States, California | |
| University of California at San Francisco | |
| San Francisco, California, United States, 94143 | |
| United States, Colorado | |
| University of Colorado Health Sciences Center | |
| Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045 | |
| United States, New York | |
| Feinstein Institute for Medical Research NS-L1J Health System | |
| Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030 | |
| University of Rochester | |
| Rochester, New York, United States, 14642 | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| Duke University Medical Center | |
| Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27709 | |
| Study Chair: | Maria Dall'Era, MD | Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco |
| Study Chair: | David Wofsy, MD | Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00447265 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | DAIT ALN01 |
| Study First Received: | March 12, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | October 7, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | December 16, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
|
Lupus Nephritis Nephritis Glomerulonephritis Kidney Diseases Urologic Diseases Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic Connective Tissue Diseases Autoimmune Diseases Immune System Diseases Mycophenolic Acid TNFR-Fc fusion protein Antibiotics, Antineoplastic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Analgesics Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Anti-Inflammatory Agents Antirheumatic Agents Gastrointestinal Agents Immunologic Factors Immunosuppressive Agents Central Nervous System Agents |