• Key Outcome as Per Statistical Analysis Plan = Major Atherosclerotic Events Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo [ Time Frame: Median follow-up 4.9 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Major atherosclerotic events defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death, non-hemorrhagic stroke, or any arterial revascularization procedure (excluding dialysis access procedures). Numbers provided = number of patients with events.
  
  

• Major Vascular Events Analyzed Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo [ Time Frame: Median follow-up 4.9 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Major vascular events defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death, any stroke, or any arterial revascularization procedure (excluding dialysis access procedures). Numbers provided = number of patients with events.
  
  
• Major Vascular Events Analyzed Amongst Patients Initially Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus Placebo (Original Protocol-defined Primary Outcome) [ Time Frame: Median follow-up 4.9 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Major vascular events defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death, any stroke, or any arterial revascularization procedure (excluding dialysis access procedures). Numbers provided = number of patients with events.
  
  
• Major Coronary Events Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo [ Time Frame: Median follow-up 4.9 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Major coronary events defined as coronary death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Myocardial infarction adjudicated based on the presence of serial changes in cardiac biomarkers (e.g. troponin, creatine kinase), typical ECG changes and typical cardiac symptoms. If myocardial infarction was fatal and post-mortem examination findings were available, this information was also assessed. All potential coronary events were adjudicated, using pre-specified objective criteria, by clinicians blinded to study treatment allocation and lipid levels. Numbers provided = number of patients with events.
  
  
• Non-hemorrhagic Stroke Among All of Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo [ Time Frame: Median follow-up 4.9 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Stroke was defined as rapid onset of focal or global neurological deficit, with duration greater than 24 hours. Clinical notes and brain imaging were sought to determine the stroke etiology, and if the stroke was fatal and post-mortem examination findings were available, this information was also assessed. All potential stroke events (including transient ischemic attack and intracerebral hemorrhage) were adjudicated, using pre-specified objective criteria, by clinicians blinded to study treatment allocation and lipid levels. Numbers provided = number of patients with events.
  
  
• Coronary or Non-coronary Revascularization Among All Patients Ever Randomized to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus All Patients Allocated to Placebo [ Time Frame: Median follow-up 4.9 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Revascularization included any arterial revascularization procedure, whether surgical or percutaneous, but excluded revascularization performed for hemodialysis vascular access (e.g. fistuloplasty) or to the donor kidney transplant artery. Revascularization included amputations for vascular disease (rather than for trauma or infection). All potential revascularization events (including angiography) were adjudicated, using pre-specified objective criteria, by clinicians blinded to study treatment allocation and lipid levels. Numbers provided = number of patients with events.
  
  
• End-stage Renal Disease Among All Patients Not on Dialysis at the Time of Randomization to Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe Versus Placebo [ Time Frame: Median follow-up 4.9 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  End-stage renal disease was defined as initiation of maintenance dialysis or renal transplantation. Temporary dialysis was excluded. All potential dialysis and transplant events were adjudicated, using pre-specified objective criteria, by clinicians blinded to study treatment allocation and lipid levels. Numbers provided = number of patients with events.
  
  

The SHARP (Study of Heart and Renal Protection) was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial which aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of reducing LDL cholesterol in more than 9,000 patients with chronic kidney disease (about 3,000 of whom were on dialysis at randomization).

Patients were randomly assigned to simvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily versus matching placebo (a subset of these patients had previously received simvastatin 20mg only and were then randomly re-assigned to receive simvastatin 20mg plus ezetimibe 10mg or placebo at one year). Details of the SHARP trial design and methods have been reported previously (reference: Am Heart J 2010; 160:785-94.).

SHARP was overseen by an independent Steering Committee that included nephrologists, cardiologists, clinical trialists, and statisticians, with 2 non-voting observers from the main funder (Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals). The independent sponsor was the University of Oxford, and the trial was funded by Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, the British Heart Foundation and the UK Medical Research Council.

In October 2009, the Steering Committee decided (blind to the effects of study treatment on clinical outcomes) to change the original protocol-specified primary outcome to a revised key outcome of major atherosclerotic events, defined as the combination of non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary death, ischemic stroke, or any revascularization procedure (i.e. exclusion of non-coronary cardiac deaths and strokes confirmed to be hemorrhagic from the original major vascular event outcome). These and other changes are described in the revised statistical analysis plan for SHARP (reference: Am Heart J 2010; 160:785-94.). Accordingly, the chief emphasis of the published results (reference: Lancet 2011; 377:2181-92) is on the revised pre-specified key outcome of first major atherosclerotic events.