Nelfinavir and Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone in Patients With Progressive Multiple Myeloma That Have Failed Lenalidomide-containing Therapy
There is a great need for treatment options in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after failure of the lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen as there is no established standard active therapy for these patients.
Combining nelfinavir, a drug targeting both the proteasome and PI3K/Akt pathway, with lenalidomide, may restore lenalidomide-sensitivity to the disease as has been shown in vivo for the PI3K/Akt inhibitor perifosine and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.
Patients expected to be included in the trial are heavily pretreated and might not be candidates for further intensive therapies. The combination of nelfinavir with lenalidomide/dexamethasone offers also to these patients an alternative. Preliminary experiences in another SAKK trial with the combination of bortezomib and nelfinavir are positive with few side effects with nelfinavir doses of up to 1875 mg twice daily (bid). For the phase I part of the trial a starting dose of 1250 mg nelfinavir bid was chosen, since the necessary plasma concentration of nelfinavir will not be reached with lower doses.
In case of progression during or after the trial treatment any other lenalidomide- or bortezomib-based chemotherapy combination could be an option for the patient. However, the addition of a chemotherapeutic drug like cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin has known side effects like hematological toxicities, nausea, vomiting and hair loss.
The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that the combination of nelfinavir with lenalidomide/dexamethasone is safe (phase I, dose escalation of nelfinavir) and active (phase II). Patients who do not respond to trial medication will stop trial treatment after 4 months of therapy at the latest.
If the combination of nelfinavir with lenalidomide/dexamethasone should prove to be safe and efficient in treatment of lenalidomide-refractory MM, this would be the first orally available treatment for these patients and establish a new class of drugs (human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors) as active antineoplastic agents in MM. In addition this would establish the concept of "re-sensitizing" patients to lenalidomide therapy and demonstrate the effect of nelfinavir on proteasomal degradation and Akt phosphorylation in cancer patients in vivo.
|Study Design:||Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Nelfinavir and Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone in Patients With Progressive Multiple Myeloma That Have Failed Lenalidomide-containing Therapy - A Single Arm Phase I/II Trial|
- Phase I: Dose limiting toxicity [ Time Frame: Until up to 4 weeks after start of trial therapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Phase II: Overall response [ Time Frame: 16 weeks after the start of trial therapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Phase I/II: Frequency and percent of occurrence of adverse events during each cycle of treatment, and within patients [ Time Frame: Until 30 days after up to 16 weeks of trial therapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Phase I/II: Disease control, i.e. no progression at 16 weeks after start of trial therapy [ Time Frame: At 16 weeks after the start of trial therapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Phase I/II: Duration of response [ Time Frame: Duration from first observation of response to the time of disease progression, with deaths due to causes other than progression censored, assessed until an expected maximum of 3 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Phase I/II: Overall survival [ Time Frame: At 6 months after start of trial therapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Phase I/II: Progression free survival [ Time Frame: Progression free survial time ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Phase I/II: Time to progression [ Time Frame: Duration from start of treatment to disease progression, with deaths due to causes other than progression censored, assessed until an expected maximum of 3 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Phase I: Overall response [ Time Frame: 16 weeks after the start of trial therapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|Study Start Date:||April 2012|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||December 2019|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||December 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Experimental: Nelfinavir and Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone
Phase I: Cycles 1-4 (1 cycle = 28 days) Lenalidomide: 25 mg per day p.o., day 1 to 21 Dexamethasone: 40/20 mg per day p.o., days 1, 8, 15, 22 Nelfinavir: Dose escalation in cohorts of 3 patients
Phase II: Cycles 1-4 (1 cycle = 28 days) Lenalidomide: 25 mg per day p.o., day 1 to 21 Dexamethasone: 40/20 mg per day p.o., days 1, 8, 15, 22 Nelfinavir: Dose established in phase I twice daily p.o., day 1 to 21
In phase II, the recommended dose of nelfinavir will be administered orally twice daily (in the morning and in the evening) on d1-d21 every 28 days for a maximum of 4 cycles
Other Name: ViraceptDrug: Lenalidomide
25 mg of lenalidomide (capsules) will be administered orally daily on d1-d21 every 28 days for a maximum of 4 cycles
Other Name: RevlimidDrug: Dexamethasone
40 mg (for patients <75 years) or 20 mg (for patients ≥75 years) of dexamethasone (tablets) will be administered orally once per day on d1, 8, 15 and 22 every 28 days for a maximum of 4 cycles
Other Name: Dexamethasone
Hide Detailed Description
MM is a plasma cell tumor. It accounted for an estimated 20,180 new cases of cancer and 11,170 deaths in the United States in 2010. With a prevalence of 23 per 100,000 people, MM is an orphan disease (prevalence <5:10,000). The median age at diagnosis is 60-65 years. Although MM remains incurable, unprecedented gains in survival outcomes have been achieved in the last three decades. Survival has been improved mainly in younger patients below the age of 65 with the advent of high-dose melphalan therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In the last 10 years the introduction of novel therapies, such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib have further improved overall survival. However, all patients ultimately relapse and will require salvage therapies.
The main decision criterion for first-line treatment selection is the patient's eligibility for high-dose chemotherapy with melphalan and subsequent ASCT. Patients who are not eligible for this treatment, due to advanced age, comorbidities or poor performance status, are routinely treated with a combination of melphalan, prednisone and a novel agent such as thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide. Currently, patients will relapse from their first line of therapy at a median of 2-3 years from diagnosis. Achieving a near complete remission and maintaining the residual tumor mass under control is considered as the mainstay in current treatment of MM.
Treatment of relapsed/refractory myeloma is based on double or triple combinations with a novel agent such as lenalidomide or bortezomib with dexamethasone and/or cytotoxic drugs such as alkylators and anthracyclines. The choice of a regimen at relapse depends on the frontline therapy as well as disease- or therapy-related comorbidities. Although patients can achieve long lasting remissions with the novel agents MM remains a chronic disease. Patients will invariably relapse or become refractory to second and later line treatments. Therefore new treatment options for late-line patients are required.
The combination of lenalidomide and bortezomib has been reported to show activity in a subset of lenalidomide and bortezomib double-refractory patients in a phase I/II trial and very recent retrospective data suggest that bortezomib containing regimens may be active in lenalidomide-refractory myeloma patients. There are no approved treatment options for lenalidomide and bortezomib double-refractory patients. Possible therapeutic alternatives such as carfilzomib and pomalidomide are still in clinical development and to date no clinical trials are open in Switzerland. Therefore, treatment options for lenalidomide-refractory patients remain very limited.
Preclinical results in the NCI60 cancer cell line panel show that HIV protease inhibitors such as nelfinavir exhibit a wide spectrum of antitumor activity. They inhibit the proliferation of 60 cancer cell lines derived from nine different tumor types. This is consistent with previous reports demonstrating that HIV protease inhibitors are effective in other diseases like MM and Kaposi sarcoma. Nelfinavir induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in tumor cells through inhibition of proteasomal degradation and the PI3K/Akt pathway. Therefore preclinical evidence underscores the proteasome inhibiting activity of nelfinavir. Modulation of proteasome function is a rational approach to overcome chemo-resistance and achieve chemo-sensitization, suggesting that the addition of such an agent to myeloma standard treatment could restore sensitivity to the standard therapy.
Pharmacologic intervention with the PI3K/Akt pathway induced cell death in MM cell lines and primary tumor samples. Inhibition of Akt phosphorylation by perifosine has shown significant clinical activity and manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory MM in combination with dexamethasone alone (≥MR (minor response) of 38%; SD (stable disease) of 47%), or together with both lenalidomide and dexamethasone (≥PR (partial response) of 50%, MR of 20%). These data suggest an important role of the Akt pathway for malignant growth and survival of MM cells also in vivo. The addition of nelfinavir to standard lenalidomide/dexamethasone treatment in lenalidomide-refractory patients is expected to restore sensitivity of the myeloma cells to lenalidomide, acting via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway and modulation of proteasome function.
Aim of this study is to demonstrate the safety and activity of combining lenalidomide and dexamethasone with nelfinavir in patients with progressive MM that have failed lenalidomide-containing therapy.
Nelfinavir mesylate (Viracept) is an inhibitor of the HIV protease 1. Inhibition of this viral protease prevents cleavage of the Gag and Gag-Pol polyproteins resulting in the production of immature, non-infectious virus. The pharmacokinetic properties of nelfinavir were evaluated in healthy volunteers and HIV-infected patients. No substantial differences were observed between the two groups. In Switzerland the registered dose of nelfinavir for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents is 1250 mg bid or 750 mg three times daily (tid).
Plasma concentrations from a pharmacokinetic study with 10 HIV-positive patients after multiple dosing with 1250 mg twice daily for 28 days were 4.0 mg/L (peak plasma level) and 2.2 mg/L / 0.7 mg/L (morning/evening trough), respectively. Peak plasma concentrations were approximately 6 microM. Nelfinavir in serum is extensively protein-bound (>98%). The area under the curve (AUC) is 1.5 times higher with the bid regimen compared to the tid regimen, without significantly elevated toxicity. The maximal concentration of nelfinavir is usually achieved 3 to 4 hours after administration with food. The effective half-life in blood plasma ranges from 3 to 5 hours. Multi-dose pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir, have not been studied in HIV-positive patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency.
Nelfinavir is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C19. The main metabolite of nelfinavir (the hydroxylated metabolite nelfinavir M8) is also active against HIV and circulates in the plasma at around 30% of the present nelfinavir amount.
The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) has not been defined yet. A respective dose finding trial for nelfinavir mono-therapy in patients with solid tumors is ongoing. Preliminary data from that trial shows that nelfinavir is well tolerated at 2.5 times (2 x 3125 mg/day) the American Food and Drug Administration approved dose for the treatment of HIV infections of 2 x 1250 mg/day with no grade 4-5 clinical toxicities. The most prevalent laboratory abnormalities grade 4 with a dose level (DL) of 3125 mg bid were transaminitis, hyperglycemia and diarrhea. The AUC of nelfinavir in plasma showed a plateau at doses of 1875 mg bid.
A phase I study of Nelfinavir in liposarcoma with a maximum DL of 4250 mg bid shows a peak plasma level of 6.3 mg/L. One patient experienced transient grade 3 pancreatitis after one week of nelfinavir. No other DLTs were observed.
Recent testing of this nelfinavir dose in combination with radiation therapy and weekly gemcitabine (200-300 mg/m2) in patients with pancreatic cancer did not cause increased toxicity in this trial.
The main side effects of nelfinavir include diarrhea (>10%), rash, elevated liver enzymes, and reduced blood counts (1-10%) at the therapeutic standard concentration of 1250 mg bid.
Lenalidomide (Revlimid) is a derivative of thalidomide. The exact mechanism of action of these immunomodulatory drugs is not known. Apart from interfering with the immune system, they are also thought to act on angiogenesis. There are multiple mechanisms of action, and they can be simplified by organizing them as mechanisms of action in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, lenalidomide has three main activities: direct anti-tumor effect, inhibition of the micro-environmental support for tumor cells, and an immunomodulatory role. In vivo, lenalidomide induces tumor cell apoptosis directly and indirectly by inhibition of bone marrow stromal cell support, by anti-angiogenic and anti-osteoclastogenic effects, and by immunomodulatory activity. Lenalidomide has a broad range of activities that can be exploited to treat many hematologic and solid cancers.
Lenalidomide is one of the novel drug agents used to treat MM. It is a small molecular analogue of thalidomide that was originally found based on its ability to effectively inhibit tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) production. Lenalidomide is 50,000 times more potent than thalidomide in inhibiting TNF-α, and has less severe adverse drug reactions.
The most important side effects of lenalidomide are thromboembolism and hematological toxicity. The most common side effects are neutropenia, thrombopenia, anemia, fatigue, constipation, diarrhea, asthenia and rash. In contrast to thalidomide, lenalidomide does not cause neuropathies. Hematotoxicity is dose dependent and easily manageable with dose reductions.
Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone is a Swissmedic approved treatment for MM patients who have received at least one prior medicinal therapy. The combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared to dexamethasone alone led to significantly improved progression free survival (median 11.1 vs. 4.6 months) and overall survival (median 38.0 vs. 31.6 months) in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma in two international phase III trials. More than 1/3 of these patients had previously been treated with the structurally related thalidomide.
Dexamethasone is a glucocorticosteroid that is used in the treatment of MM, which reduces the activity of the immune system by attaching to receptors in various types of immune cells. In MM, high-dose dexamethasone is used together with chemotherapy to make chemotherapy more effective and to reduce certain side effects of cancer treatment, such as nausea and vomiting.
It appears to cause apoptosis. This means that steroids such as dexamethasone can trigger the destruction of myeloma cells. Typically dexamethasone is given with other agents - such as vincristine, doxorubicin, thalidomide or lenalidomide - to treat MM. It has been found that steroids can increase the ability of chemotherapeutic and immunomodulatory agents such as lenalidomide to destroy myeloma cells.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01555281
|Contact: Felicitas Hitz, MD||+41 71 494 10 email@example.com|
|Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IEO||Not yet recruiting|
|Milano, Italy, 20141|
|Contact: Giovanni Martinelli, Prof. +39 (02) 57489 538 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|University of Torino||Not yet recruiting|
|Torino, Italy, 10127|
|Contact: Antonio Palumbo, Prof. +39 (01) 16336 107 email@example.com|
|Aarau, Switzerland, 5001|
|Contact: Mario Bargetzi, Prof. +41 62 838 60 53 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Bargetzi Mario, Prof|
|Istituto Oncologico Svizzera Italiana IOSI||Recruiting|
|Bellinzona, Switzerland, 6500|
|Contact: Erika Lerch, MD +41 91 811 91 11 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator: Erika Lerch, MD|
|Bern, Switzerland, 3010|
|Contact: Thomas Pabst, Prof. +41 31 632 84 30 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Thomas Pabst, Prof|
|Chur, Switzerland, 7000|
|Contact: Ulrich Mey, PD +41 81 256 71 70 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator: Ulrich Mey, MD|
|Kantonsspital Luzern||Not yet recruiting|
|Luzern, Switzerland, 6000|
|Contact: Ralph Winterhalder, MD +41 41 205 58 75 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Olten, Switzerland, 4600|
|Contact: Dorothea Friess, MD +41 62 311 41 79 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator: Dorothea Friess, MD|
|Kantonsspital St. Gallen||Recruiting|
|St. Gallen, Switzerland, 9007|
|Contact: Felicitas Hitz, MD +41 71 494 10 66 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Felicitas Hitz, MD|
|Thun, Switzerland, 3600|
|Contact: Daniel Rauch, MD +41 33 226 26 45 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator: Daniel Rauch, MD|
|Universitäts Spital Zürich||Recruiting|
|Zürich, Switzerland, 8091|
|Contact: Samaras Panagiotis, Dr +41 44 255 22 14 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator: Panagiotis Samaras, MD|
|Study Chair:||Felicitas Hitz, MD||Kantonsspital, CH-9007 St. Gallen|