The Neuroeconomics of Behavioral Therapies for Adolescent Substance Abuse (Imaging)
This study will measure the brain activity of adolescent substance abusers while they make decisions about their preferences to receive smaller, immediate rewards versus larger delayed rewards. The investigators expect that patterns of brain activity while engaged in this decision making task will predict response to treatment among adolescent substance users. The investigators expect to use the results of this study to develop more effective treatments for adolescent substance abuse
Adolescent Substance Use
|Study Design:||Observational Model: Family-Based
Time Perspective: Prospective
|Official Title:||The Neuroeconomics of Behavioral Therapies for Adolescent Substance Abuse|
- Marijuana and alcohol abstinence [ Time Frame: Assessed at end of treatment, and quarterly for one year after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|Study Start Date:||April 2010|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||March 2014|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||March 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Hide Detailed Description
Little is known about the role of adolescent neurodevelopment in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes. The development and evaluation of adolescent substance abuse treatments rarely includes consideration of varying cognitive capacities and their neural representations as determinants of individual variation in treatment response. This proposed R21 project would address this gap by identifying associations among decision making, task-related neural processing, and treatment outcome among adolescents participating/have participated in two randomized clinical trials for adolescent substance abuse. Increasing our understanding of neural processes that underlie decision making in adolescent marijuana and alcohol users would inform the development of future intervention and prevention efforts.
This complementary project draws subjects from two studies investigating contingency-management (CM) based treatments "Behavioral Treatment of Adolescent Marijuana Abuse" (DA015186), and "Family Based Contingency Management for Adolescent Alcohol Abuse" (AA016917). Both trials compare a unique CM intervention that involves an abstinence-based reinforcement program to a standard, state of the art cognitive behavioral intervention. Analyses would be performed separately for the two samples, with hypotheses tested first using the Marijuana sample, and assessed for replication/specificity using the Alcohol sample. The proposed project would explore novel neurobiological predictors of response to CM interventions.
Adolescents recruited into the Marijuana Trial (n=69; 23 per treatment arm) and the Alcohol Trial (n=54; 27 per treatment arm) during the period of this R21 project would participate in a single neuroimaging session as soon after the intake session as possible, within 7 to 30 days. During the neuroimaging session, adolescents would make intertemporal choice decisions in a Delay Discounting task regarding gains of $100 and $1,000. Preliminary data from the Marijuana trial demonstrates significant association between performance on this behavioral delay discounting task and abstinence achieved during treatment over and above the significant effect of treatment condition. The investigators seek to understand the neural processes that underlie performance on this laboratory task, and the degree to which variation in these neural processes relates to and predicts adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes. The conceptual framework for the proposed project is based on the neuroeconomics of addiction in general, and the competing neural systems hypothesis in particular (Bechara, 2005a; Bickel, et al., 2007; Daw, et al., 2005; Jentsch & Taylor, 1999). This behavioral choice hypothesis postulates a biased competition between an "impulsive" (or ''reflexive") neural system (including the striatum, amygdala, ventral pallidum, and related structures) and the "executive" (or "reflective") neural system (including the prefrontal cortex) in understanding patterns of suboptimal decision making among substance-dependent individuals. An overarching hypothesis is that differing responses to distinct treatment approaches (CM vs. CBT) are partially determined by the pattern of activation or functional connectivity within and across these competing neural systems. These project hypotheses would be tested by the following specific aims:
- Determine the degree to which performance on a laboratory delay discounting task correlates with activity in impulsive and/or executive neural systems.
- Determine the degree to which performance on a laboratory delay discounting task and neural processing predict adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome over and above the effects of treatment condition.
- Explore interactions between response to CM and delay discounting-related neural processing.
In summary, this proposed exploratory/developmental project would importantly contribute to the understanding of the role of neural processing in adolescent substance-abuse treatment processes and outcome. Specifically, this study has the potential to reveal relations among decision making, neural processing, and treatment outcomes, including the role of patterns of neural activation on response to contingency management among adolescent substance abusers. Results will have implications for future research on adolescent neurodevelopment and adolescent substance abuse treatment. The potential to use neuroscience findings to better understand and improve treatment outcomes in substance-abusing adolescents will have strong public health impact.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01093898
|Contact: Catherine Stanger, Ph.D.||855 290 email@example.com|
|Contact: Alan J Budney, Ph.D.||855 290 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|United States, New Hampshire|
|Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth||Recruiting|
|Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756|
|Contact: Gray Norton 855-290-2822 email@example.com|
|Principal Investigator: Catherine Stanger, Ph.D.|
|Sub-Investigator: Alan J Budney, PhD|
|Sub-Investigator: Robert Roth, PhD|
|Principal Investigator:||Catherine Stanger, Ph.D.||Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth|