Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Cardiovascular Outcomes Study of Alogliptin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome (EXAMINE)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified January 2012 by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.

First Received on August 28, 2009.   Last Updated on January 10, 2012   History of Changes
Sponsor: Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party): Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00968708
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of alogliptin, once daily (QD), compared with placebo, in addition to standard of care, in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome.


Condition Intervention Phase
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Drug: Alogliptin
Drug: Placebo
Phase III

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Treatment With Alogliptin in Addition to Standard of Care in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Time from randomization to the occurrence of the Primary Major Adverse Cardiac Events, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke. [ Time Frame: At first occurrence (up to 4.75 years). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Time from randomization to the occurrence of the Secondary Major Adverse Cardiac Events defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and urgent revascularization due to unstable angina. [ Time Frame: At first occurrence (up to 4.75 years). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 5400
Study Start Date: September 2009
Estimated Study Completion Date: December 2014
Estimated Primary Completion Date: May 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Alogliptin QD Drug: Alogliptin

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4.75 years for patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4.75 years for patients with moderately impaired renal function as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Alogliptin 6.25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4.75 years for patients with severely impaired renal function or end stage renal disease defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Other Names:
  • SYR-322
  • SYR110322
Placebo Comparator: Placebo QD Drug: Placebo
Alogliptin placebo matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4.75 years.

Detailed Description:

Alogliptin is a selective and potent dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor currently being developed by Takeda for use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results from five phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 26-week studies have demonstrated that alogliptin is effective in reducing glycosylated hemoglobin as monotherapy and when added to commonly used antidiabetic agents, including sulfonylureas, metformin, thiazolidinediones, and insulin. Alogliptin is well-tolerated and associated with few adverse events.

Cardiovascular outcomes is of special interest in the type 2 diabetes mellitus population, particularly in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects who have cardiovascular disease and are at high risk for major adverse cardiac events, such as those patients who have had recent acute coronary syndrome.

This study has been designed to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of alogliptin versus placebo in addition to Standard of Care in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Subject is receiving monotherapy or combination antidiabetic therapy with a glycosylated hemoglobin level between 6.5% and 11.0%, inclusive, at Screening (between 7.0 and 11.0%, inclusive, if the subject's antidiabetic regimen includes insulin)
  • Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome within 15 to 90 days prior to randomization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs of type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Currently receiving a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for glycemic control of type 2 diabetes mellitus at Screening
  • Received a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for either more than 14 days total or within the 3 months prior to Screening
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00968708

Contacts
Contact: Takeda Study Registration Call Center 800-778-2860 medicalinformation@tpna.com

  Show 915 Study Locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.
Investigators
Study Director: VP, Clinical Science Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.
  More Information

No publications provided by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.

Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00968708     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: SYR-322_402, U1111-1111-6825, 2009-011222-34, JapicCTI-101246, DOH-27-0310-3047, 09/H0709/63, CTRI/2010/091/000046, 2009-011222-34, 2009-011222-34
Study First Received: August 28, 2009
Last Updated: January 10, 2012
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration;   Argentina: Administracion Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnologia Medica;   Argentina: Human Research Bioethics Committee;   Austria: Agency for Health and Food Safety;   Austria: Ethikkommission;   Austria: Federal Ministry for Health and Women;   Austria: Federal Office for Safety in Health Care;   Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration;   Australia: Human Research Ethics Committee;   Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council;   Belgium: Directorate general for the protection of Public health: Medicines;   Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicinal Products and Health Products;   Belgium: Institutional Review Board;   Belgium: Ministry of Social Affairs, Public Health and the Environment;   Belgium: The Federal Public Service (FPS) Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment;   Brazil: Ministry of Health;   Brazil: National Committee of Ethics in Research;   Brazil: National Health Surveillance Agency;   Bulgaria: Bulgarian Drug Agency;   Bulgaria: Ministry of Health;   Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health Research;   Canada: Ethics Review Committee;   Canada: Health Canada;   Canada: Ministry of Health & Long Term Care, Ontario;   Chile: Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica;   Chile: Instituto de Salud Publica de Chile;   Costa Rica: Ministry of Health Costa Rica;   Czech Republic: Ethics Committee;   Czech Republic: State Institute for Drug Control;   Denmark: Danish Dataprotection Agency;   Denmark: Danish Medicines Agency;   Denmark: Ethics Committee;   Denmark: National Board of Health;   Denmark: The Danish National Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics;   Denmark: The Ministry of the Interior and Health;   Denmark: The Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics;   European Union: European Medicines Agency;   Finland: Ethics Committee;   Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health;   Finland: Finnish Medicines Agency;   France: Afssaps - French Health Products Safety Agency;   France: Direction Générale de la Santé;   France: French Data Protection Authority;   France: Institutional Ethical Committee;   France: Ministry of Health;   France: National Consultative Ethics Committee for Health and Life Sciences;   Germany: Ethics Commission;   Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices;   Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research;   Germany: Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection;   Germany: German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information;   Germany: Ministry of Health;   Germany: Paul-Ehrlich-Institut;   Guatemala: Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance;   Hong Kong: Department of Health;   Hong Kong: Ethics Committee;   Hong Kong: Joint CUHK-NTEC Clinical Research Ethics Committee;   Hungary: National Institute of Pharmacy;   India: Central Drugs Standard Control Organization;   India: Department of Atomic Energy;   India: Drugs Controller General of India;   India: Indian Council of Medical Research;   India: Institutional Review Board;   India: Ministry of Health;   India: Ministry of Science and Technology;   India: Science and Engineering Research Council;   Israel: The Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research and Health Services Research;   Israel: Ethics Commission;   Israel: Israeli Health Ministry Pharmaceutical Administration;   Israel: Ministry of Health;   Italy: Ethics Committee;   Italy: Ministry of Health;   Italy: National Bioethics Committee;   Italy: National Institute of Health;   Italy: National Monitoring Centre for Clinical Trials - Ministry of Health;   Italy: The Italian Medicines Agency;   Korea: Food and Drug Administration;   Latvia: State Agency of Medicines;   Lithuania: Bioethics Committee;   Lithuania: State Medicine Control Agency - Ministry of Health;   Malaysia: Ministry of Health;   Mexico: Ethics Committee;   Mexico: Federal Commission for Protection Against Health Risks;   Mexico: Federal Commission for Sanitary Risks Protection;   Mexico: Ministry of Health;   Mexico: National Council of Science and Technology;   Mexico: National Institute of Public Health, Health Secretariat;   Netherlands: Dutch Health Care Inspectorate;   Netherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC);   Netherlands: Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB);   Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO);   New Zealand: Food Safety Authority;   New Zealand: Health Research Council;   New Zealand: Health and Disability Ethics Committees;   New Zealand: Institutional Review Board;   New Zealand: Medsafe;   Peru: Ethics Committee;   Peru: General Directorate of Pharmaceuticals, Devices, and Drugs;   Peru: Ministry of Health;   Philippines: Department of Health;   Philippines: Bureau of Food and Drugs;   Poland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products;   Poland: Ministry of Health;   Poland: Ministry of Science and Higher Education;   Portugal: Ethics Committee for Clinical Research;   Portugal: Health Ethic Committee;   Portugal: National Pharmacy and Medicines Institute;   Romania: Ministry of Public Health;   Romania: National Medicines Agency;   Romania: State Institute for Drug Control;   Russia: Ethics Committee;   Russia: Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation;   Russia: Pharmacological Committee, Ministry of Health;   Serbia: Ethics Committee;   Slovakia: State Institute for Drug Control;   South Africa: Department of Health;   South Africa: Medicines Control Council;   South Africa: National Health Research Ethics Council;   South Korea: Institutional Review Board;   South Korea: Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA);   Spain: Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica;   Spain: Ethics Committee;   Spain: Ministry of Health;   Spain: Ministry of Health and Consumption;   Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines;   Sweden: Institutional Review Board;   Sweden: Medical Products Agency;   Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board;   Sweden: Swedish National Council on Medical Ethics;   Sweden: Swedish Research Council;   Sweden: The National Board of Health and Welfare;   Thailand: Ethical Committee;   Thailand: Food and Drug Administration;   Thailand: Khon Kaen University Ethics Committee for Human Research;   Thailand: Ministry of Public Health;   Turkey: Ethics Committee;   Turkey: Ministry of Health;   Ukraine: Ministry of Health;   Ukraine: State Pharmacological Center - Ministry of Health;   United Kingdom: Department of Health;   United Kingdom: Food Standards Agency;   United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency;   United Kingdom: National Health Service;   United Kingdom: Research Ethics Committee;   United States: Federal Government;   United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.:
Diabetes Mellitus - Type 2
Diabetes Mellitus
cardiovascular outcomes
heart attack
stroke
dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors
metabolic disorders
metabolic diseases
glucose metabolism disorders

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Glucose Metabolism Disorders
Metabolic Diseases
Endocrine System Diseases
Myocardial Ischemia
Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Angina Pectoris
Vascular Diseases
Chest Pain
Pain
Signs and Symptoms
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
Alogliptin
Protease Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Pharmacologic Actions
Hypoglycemic Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 09, 2012