A Study to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of the Bivalent Killed Whole Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine in Adults and Children
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the killed bivalent (O1 and O139)whole cell oral cholera vaccine(Shanchol™) is safe and effective in the treatment of Vibrio cholerae.
Biological: killed bivalent (O1 and O139)whole cell oral cholera vaccine
|Study Design:||Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Prevention
|Official Title:||An Open Label Post Licensure Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Indigenously Manufactured Killed Bivalent (O1 and O139) Whole Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine(Shanchol™)|
- Proportion of subjects with diarrhea [ Time Frame: 28 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Proportion of subjects exhibiting 4-fold or greater rises in titers of serum vibriocidal antibodies relative to baseline [ Time Frame: 14 days after each dose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Geometric mean serum vibriocidal titers [ Time Frame: baseline and 14 days after each dose ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Proportion of subjects with any of the following adverse events: immediate reactions, serious adverse events, reactogenicity: headache, vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain/cramps, gas, diarrhea, fever, loss of appetite, general ill feeling [ Time Frame: 28 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
|Study Start Date:||March 2012|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||April 2013|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||January 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
killed bivalent (O1 and O139)whole cell oral cholera vaccine(Shanchol™)
Biological: killed bivalent (O1 and O139)whole cell oral cholera vaccine
1.5 ml given twice orally, 14 days apart
Other Name: Shanchol™
Hide Detailed Description
Provision of safe water and food, establishment of adequate sanitation, and implementation of personal and community hygiene constitute the main public health interventions against cholera. These measures cannot be implemented fully in the near future in most cholera-endemic areas. Improvements to water and sanitation require substantial long-term investments, commitment from the local government, and often take years to implement. In the meantime, a safe, effective and affordable vaccine would be a useful tool for cholera prevention and control.
Considerable progress has been made during the last decade in the development of new generation oral vaccines against cholera. These have already been licensed in some countries and are now being considered for wider public health application. Cholera immunization is now recommended for travelers to high risk areas, refugee camps and for outbreak response. Furthermore, expanded use of cholera vaccines may be recommended for endemic areas, where there is increasing demand from both low- and middle-income populations.
Starting in the mid-1980s, following technology transfer from Prof Jan Holmgren, Vietnamese scientists at the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology (NIHE) in Hanoi developed and produced an oral, killed cholera vaccine for the country's public health programs. A two-dose regimen of a first generation monovalent (anti-O1) cholera vaccine produced at US$ 0.10 per dose underwent a field trial in Hue, Vietnam. The study was not formally randomized: the vaccine was assigned on the basis of a systematic allocation scheme and the control group did not receive a placebo. The calculated efficacy against El Tor cholera was 66% in fully immunized adults and children. Protection against non-cholera was assessed and none was found suggesting a non-biased study design. Subsequently, killed 0139 whole cells were added to the Vietnamese vaccine due to the emergence of the new form of epidemic cholera caused by this serogroup. A study found the bivalent vaccine to be safe and immunogenic in adults and children one year and older.
The Vietnamese vaccine has several distinct advantages over the Swedish vaccine. The Vietnamese vaccine confers protection against the El Tor biotype in younger children. And the price of US $0.10 per dose is feasible for public health programs in developing countries, while the Swedish vaccine is prohibitively expensive. Finally, it can be administered without a buffer, while the Swedish vaccine requires a buffer and stricter cold chain requirements.
Since licensure of the oral cholera vaccine in Vietnam, more than 9 million doses have been administered without any report of serious adverse events. The vaccine is produced according to recommended guidelines at the Company for Vaccine and Biological Production No. 1 (VABIOTECH) in Hanoi. VABIOTECH is working towards WHO Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) certification, which they hope to receive in the next few years. At the same time, the IVI and VABIOTECH have been working to internationalize the Vietnamese vaccine for global use. In order to comply with WHO requirements, the vaccine was reformulated.
Phase II trials of this reformulated killed oral cholera vaccine were performed in SonLa, Vietnam and Kolkata, India where the vaccine was found to be safe and no serious adverse reaction was associated with the vaccine. The vaccine elicited significant vibriocidal antibody responses among vaccinees. In SonLa, 90% of adult recipients seroconverted to V. cholerae O1 following receipt of two doses of the vaccine. In Kolkata, 53% of adults and 80% of children aged 1-17 years developed 4-fold and greater rises in vibriocidal antibodies to V. cholerae O1. Data from Vietnam and India suggest that greater magnitudes in the vibriocidal responses following 2 doses of the vaccine are elicited compared to previous formulations. It has been suggested that this response may correlate with the higher lipopolysaccharide content of the vaccine, a result of changes in its standardization.
A phase III trial of this vaccine is currently underway in Wards 29, 30, and 33 of Kolkata, India. Since this trial is still ongoing, data regarding adverse events still has not been analyzed. As yet no serious adverse reaction has been directly attributed to the vaccine. Surveillance continues in these areas to determine the efficacy of the vaccine.
Through an agreement negotiated by the IVI, VABIOTECH produced the bulk reformulated bivalent vaccine under quality conditions supervised by the IVI. Shantha Biotechnics of India filled and finished the bulk, and obtained regulatory clearance for use of the vaccine in Phase II and III trials in India. In return, the technology for future production of the oral killed bivalent cholera vaccine was transferred to Shantha Biotechnics.
|Contact: Yanghee Kim, MPHfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Binod Sah, MBBS, Mscemail@example.com|
|Christian Medical College||Recruiting|
|Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, 632 002|
|Contact: Venkata R Mohan, M.D., MPH 91-41-6228-4207 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Contact: Gangadeep Kang, PhD 91-41-6307-2052|
|Sub-Investigator: Vinohar Balraj, MD|
|Sub-Investigator: Jayaprakash Muliyil, PhD|
|Principal Investigator:||Venkata R Mohan, M.D., MPH||Christian Medical College, Vellore, India|