Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (REALISTIC)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This is a Phase IIIb multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) administered to patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis |
Drug: Certolizumab pegol (CZP) Other: Placebo |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase IIIb Multicenter Study With a 12-week Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Period Followed by an Open-label, Extension Phase Evaluating Safety/Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Given to Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis. |
- American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
- American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use. [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
- American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use. [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
- American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
- American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects Without Prior Anti-tumor Necrosis (Anti-TNF) Use [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
- American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration < 2 Years [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
- American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 for Subjects With Disease Duration ≥ 2 Years. [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
- American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR50 responders are subjects with at least 50% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
- American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12. [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR70 responders are subjects with at least 70% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS)
- Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.
- SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.
- CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity.
- Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]HAQ-DI is derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). Change from baseline is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from baseline in CRP (mg/L) is computed as the ratio of Week 12 value divided by baseline value. A ratio less then 1 indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from Baseline in PhGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as Week 12 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was carried out using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method.
- Time to Sustained American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The time from randomization to sustained ACR20 response at 2 consecutive visits (at the latest on Week 12).
- European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]EULAR response (good response, moderate response, or no response) is defined based on the present value and improvement from baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein)].
- American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.
- American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR50 responders are subjects with at least 50% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.
- American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]ACR70 responders are subjects with at least 70% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS). This analysis was carried out using imputation.
- Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
- Change From Baseline in SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
- Change From Baseline in CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. Change from Baseline is computed as value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
- DAS28(CRP) [Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive Protein)] Remission (<2.6) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]DAS28(CRP) is calculated using tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/L), and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.
- SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤3.3) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]SDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/dL), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.
- CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) Remission (≤2.8) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS in cm). A lower score indicates less disease activity. This analysis was carried out using imputation.
- Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from Baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
- Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
- Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]HAQ-DI is derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
- Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from Baseline in CRP (mg/L) is computed as the ratio of the value at Week 28 divided by Baseline value. A ratio less then 1 indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
- Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
- Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
- Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 28 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 28 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from Baseline in PhGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 28 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. This analysis was done using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures Model (MMRM).
| Enrollment: | 1648 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Certolizumab pegol (CZP) |
Drug: Certolizumab pegol (CZP)
400 mg CZP given as two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by 200 mg CZP given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.
Other Name: Cimzia
|
| Placebo Comparator: Placebo |
Other: Placebo
Placebo (0.9% saline) given as 2 subcutaneous (sc) injections at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by placebo given as 1 sc injection on Weeks 6, 8, and 10. At Week 12 subjects enter the open label phase and receive 200 mg of CZP every other week for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.
|
Detailed Description:
The treatment period starts with a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized period followed by an open-label extension phase. In the double-blind phase, eligible patients are randomized (4:1 ratio) to receive either certolizumab pegol (CZP) or Placebo up to and including Week 10. The randomization will be stratified according to the three factors: concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX, Yes or No), prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) use (Yes or No), and disease duration categories (< 2 years or ≥ 2 years). From Week 12 all patients remaining in the study receive open-label CZP for a minimum 16 additional weeks until CZP is commercially available.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patient with established moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis
Exclusion Criteria:
- All concomitant diseases or pathological conditions that could interfere and impact the assessment of the study treatment
- Previous clinical trials and previous biological therapy that could interfere with the results in the present clinical trials
Contacts and Locations
Hide Study Locations| United States, Alabama | |
| Birmingham, Alabama, United States | |
| Montgomery, Alabama, United States | |
| United States, Arizona | |
| Phoenix, Arizona, United States | |
| Tucson, Arizona, United States | |
| United States, Arkansas | |
| Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States | |
| Little Rock, Arkansas, United States | |
| United States, California | |
| Fullerton, California, United States | |
| La Jolla, California, United States | |
| Los Angeles, California, United States | |
| Palm Desert, California, United States | |
| Sacramento, California, United States | |
| Santa Barbara, California, United States | |
| Santa Maria, California, United States | |
| Tustin, California, United States | |
| Westlake Village, California, United States | |
| Whittier, California, United States | |
| United States, Colorado | |
| Denver, Colorado, United States | |
| United States, Connecticut | |
| Danbury, Connecticut, United States | |
| Trumbull, Connecticut, United States | |
| United States, Delaware | |
| Lewes, Delaware, United States | |
| Newark, Delaware, United States | |
| United States, District of Columbia | |
| Washington, District of Columbia, United States | |
| United States, Florida | |
| Boca Raton, Florida, United States | |
| Delray Beach, Florida, United States | |
| Gainesville, Florida, United States | |
| Jacksonville, Florida, United States | |
| Orlando, Florida, United States | |
| South Miami, Florida, United States | |
| Tampa, Florida, United States | |
| Taveres, Florida, United States | |
| United States, Georgia | |
| Atlanta, Georgia, United States | |
| United States, Idaho | |
| Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States | |
| Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States | |
| United States, Illinois | |
| Maywood, Illinois, United States | |
| Peoria, Illinois, United States | |
| Rock Island, Illinois, United States | |
| Springfield, Illinois, United States | |
| United States, Indiana | |
| Evansville, Indiana, United States | |
| Indianopolis, Indiana, United States | |
| United States, Kansas | |
| Wichita, Kansas, United States | |
| United States, Kentucky | |
| Louisville, Kentucky, United States | |
| United States, Louisiana | |
| Covington, Louisiana, United States | |
| Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States | |
| United States, Maryland | |
| Baltimore, Maryland, United States | |
| Columbia, Maryland, United States | |
| Frederick, Maryland, United States | |
| Wheaton, Maryland, United States | |
| United States, Massachusetts | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States | |
| Fall River, Massachusetts, United States | |
| United States, Michigan | |
| Battle Creek, Michigan, United States | |
| Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States | |
| Lansing, Michigan, United States | |
| Petoskey, Michigan, United States | |
| United States, Minnesota | |
| Duluth, Minnesota, United States | |
| Rochester, Minnesota, United States | |
| United States, Missouri | |
| St Louis, Missouri, United States | |
| United States, New Jersey | |
| New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States | |
| Voorhees, New Jersey, United States | |
| United States, New York | |
| Albany, New York, United States | |
| Bronx, New York, United States | |
| New York, New York, United States | |
| Orchard Park, New York, United States | |
| Rochester, New York, United States | |
| Roslyn, New York, United States | |
| Smithtown, New York, United States | |
| Syracuse, New York, United States | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| Asheville, North Carolina, United States | |
| Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States | |
| Charlotte, North Carolina, United States | |
| Monroe, North Carolina, United States | |
| Wilmington, North Carolina, United States | |
| United States, Ohio | |
| Columbus, Ohio, United States | |
| Dayton, Ohio, United States | |
| Fairfield, Ohio, United States | |
| Mayfield Village, Ohio, United States | |
| United States, Oklahoma | |
| Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Erie, Pennsylvania, United States | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States | |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States | |
| West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States | |
| Wexford, Pennsylvania, United States | |
| United States, South Carolina | |
| Charleston, South Carolina, United States | |
| United States, Tennessee | |
| Jackson, Tennessee, United States | |
| United States, Texas | |
| Amarillo, Texas, United States | |
| Austin, Texas, United States | |
| Dallas, Texas, United States | |
| Fort Worth, Texas, United States | |
| Houston, Texas, United States | |
| Lubbock, Texas, United States | |
| San Antonio, Texas, United States | |
| Sugarland, Texas, United States | |
| United States, Utah | |
| Salt Lake City, Utah, United States | |
| United States, Virginia | |
| Newport News, Virginia, United States | |
| Richmond, Virginia, United States | |
| United States, Washington | |
| Spokane, Washington, United States | |
| Tacoma, Washington, United States | |
| Yakima, Washington, United States | |
| United States, West Virginia | |
| Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States | |
| United States, Wisconsin | |
| Glendale, Wisconsin, United States | |
| Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States | |
| Monroe, Wisconsin, United States | |
| Canada, Alberta | |
| Edmonton, Alberta, Canada | |
| Canada, British Columbia | |
| Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada | |
| Canada, Manitoba | |
| Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada | |
| Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador | |
| St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada | |
| Canada, Nova Scotia | |
| Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada | |
| Canada, Ontario | |
| Hamilton, Ontario, Canada | |
| Kitchener, Ontario, Canada | |
| London, Ontario, Canada | |
| Toronto, Ontario, Canada | |
| Windsor, Ontario, Canada | |
| Canada, Quebec | |
| Montreal, Quebec, Canada | |
| Rimouski, Quebec, Canada | |
| Trois-Rivires, Quebec, Canada | |
| Canada | |
| Calgary, Canada | |
| Mississauga, Canada | |
| Newmarket, Canada | |
| Sainte Foy, Canada | |
| France | |
| Amiens, France | |
| Cahors, France | |
| Corbeil Essonnes, France | |
| Dreux, France | |
| Lievin, France | |
| Montpellier, France | |
| Mulhouse, France | |
| Nantes, France | |
| Orleans, France | |
| Paris, France | |
| Pierre-Benite, France | |
| Rennes, France | |
| Saint Priest en Jarez, France | |
| Germany | |
| Bad Neuenahr, Germany | |
| Baden, Germany | |
| Berlin, Germany | |
| Chemnitz, Germany | |
| Dresden, Germany | |
| Duisburg, Germany | |
| Erfurt, Germany | |
| Erlangen, Germany | |
| Freiburg, Germany | |
| Friedrichroda, Germany | |
| Goslar, Germany | |
| Hamburg, Germany | |
| Hildesheim, Germany | |
| Hoyerswerda, Germany | |
| Jena, Germany | |
| Kiel, Germany | |
| Koln, Germany | |
| Leipzig, Germany | |
| Mainz, Germany | |
| Munchen, Germany | |
| Neuss, Germany | |
| Osnabruck, Germany | |
| Rostock, Germany | |
| Wiesbaden, Germany | |
| Zerbst, Germany | |
| Italy | |
| Bologna, Italy | |
| Genova, Italy | |
| Jesi, Italy | |
| Modena, Italy | |
| Palermo, Italy | |
| Pisa, Italy | |
| Prato, Italy | |
| Siena, Italy | |
| Udine, Italy | |
| Netherlands | |
| Apeldoorn, Netherlands | |
| Arnhem, Netherlands | |
| Den-Haag, Netherlands | |
| Leiden, Netherlands | |
| Spain | |
| Barcelona, Spain | |
| Coruna, Spain | |
| La Laguna, Spain | |
| Madrid, Spain | |
| Murcia, Spain | |
| Oviedo, Spain | |
| Pontevedra, Spain | |
| Sabadell, Spain | |
| Salamanca, Spain | |
| Santander, Spain | |
| Santiago de Compostela, Spain | |
| Torrelavega, Spain | |
| Study Director: | UCB Clinical Trial Call Center | +1 877 822 9493 (UCB) |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided by UCB, Inc.
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | UCB, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00717236 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | C87094, 2008-005427-28 |
| Study First Received: | July 15, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | March 10, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | March 2, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration Canada: Health Canada France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Italy: The Italian Medicines Agency Netherlands: Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines |
Keywords provided by UCB, Inc.:
|
Certolizumab pegol Cimzia Rheumatoid Arthritis Joint Disease Chronic Arthritis |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Arthritis Arthritis, Rheumatoid Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Rheumatic Diseases Connective Tissue Diseases |
Autoimmune Diseases Immune System Diseases Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013