A Study In Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
XenoPort, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
XenoPort, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00643760
First received: February 19, 2008
Last updated: January 28, 2013
Last verified: January 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn is effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy(DPN)
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Neuropathy, Diabetic |
Drug: Placebo Drug: GEn 1200mg/day Drug: GEn 2400mg/day Drug: GEn 3600mg/day Drug: Pregabalin |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Study PXN110448: A Dose-response Study of XP13512, Compared With Concurrent Placebo Control and LYRICA(Pregabalin), in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Associated Withdiabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Genetics Home Reference related topics:
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies
MedlinePlus related topics:
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by XenoPort, Inc.:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at End of Maintenance Treatment (EOMT) Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Baseline and EOMT values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the earliest date of Week 13 visit/Withdrawal visit/last dose of study drug (EOMT). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their API over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the Baseline score.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Day-time is defined as the time between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time API on a daily basis in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
- Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Night-time is defined as the time between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time API on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
- Change From Baseline in the Mean Current (Morning) Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current morning pain intensity in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
- Change From Baseline in the Mean Current (Evening) Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current evening pain intensity in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
- Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Day-time worst pain is defined as the partipant's assessment of their worst pain between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time worst pain in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
- Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Night-time worst pain is defined as the partipant's assessment of their worst pain between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time worst pain in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
- Change From Baseline in the Mean Sleep Interference Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Participants assessed sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point NRS (0=pain does not interfere with sleep, 10=pain completely interferes with sleep). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
- Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Dose of Rescue Medication at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Mean daily use of rescue medication (milligrams of acetaminophen) was calculated by determining the average number of tablets taken per day of rescue medication (Commerical Tylenol) during treatment and multiplying that by 500 mg. Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
- Change From Baseline in Pain Quality as Assessed by the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Summary Scores at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The NPS assesses pain qualities and consists of 11-items, 10 assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact); and 1 open-ended question not used in score calculation. 4 summary scores are calculated: NPS 10 (items 1-7, 9-11), NPS 8 (8 pain descriptor items), NPS Non-Allodynic (NA) (8 NA items), and NPS 4 (4 pain quality items); and range from 0 to 100 (0=no impact and 100=greatest impact). The analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
- Change From Baseline in Pain Characteristics and Intensity as Assessed by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The SF-MPQ, a general pain instrument, assesses the characteristics and intensity of pain and consists of 15-items assessed on a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe). 3 summary scores are calculated: sensory score (sum of items 1-11, range 0-33), affective score (sum of items 12-15, range 0-12), total score (sum of items 1-15, range 0-45), where lower scores = lower pain/impact. Analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
- Change From Baseline in Pain Score After Taking a 50-foot Walk at EOMT [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Baseline and EOMT scores are the pain scores each participant reported after taking a 50-foot walk at the randomization and Week 13/Withdrawal visits, respectively, using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with BMI, baseline pain intensity after 50-foot walk, pain intensity prior to 50-foot walk at the visit being assessed, and grouped center as covariates was used.
- Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week 13/Withdrawal visit.
- Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week 13/Withdrawal visit.
- Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Baseline and EOMT scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization and EOMT, respectively. Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the [(EOMT score minus the baseline score)divided by the baseline score], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity.
- Time to Onset of Sustained Improvement in the 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score [ Time Frame: Any time post-baseline until date of last dose of study medication (up to Week 13) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Sustained improvement in the 24-hour average pain intensity score is defined as at least 2 consecutive days on which the 24-hour average pain intensity score is >=2 points less than the mean 24-hour average pain intensity score at baseline. Time to onset is measured from baseline and was calculated as first day of event minus last day of baseline and is expressed in days. Baseline score is the calculated mean of the 24-hour average pain score for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization.
- Change From Baseline in Severity of Pain and the Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The BPI, a general pain instrument, assesses the severity and interference of pain; and consists of 6 items assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). 2 summary scores are calculated: BPI Severity Score (average of first 4 items) and BPI Interference Score (average of 7 responses to item 6); where each summary score ranges from 0 to 10 (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
- Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The SF-36 is a general health-related quality of life instrument consisting of 36 items with various response options (Yes/No, 5- to 6-point Likert scale). Summary scores are calculated for 8 domains and 2 components (physical and mental); where scores range from 0 to 100 (higher scores = better quality of life). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
- Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (POMS-B) at EOMT Using LOCF Data [ Time Frame: Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The POMS-B, an emotional functioning instrument, assesses mood, tension, and other psychological symptoms and consists of 30-items assessed on a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=extremely). 6 summary scores are calculated: Tension/Anxiety, Depression/Rejection, Anger/Hostility, Vigor/Activity, Fatigue/Inertia, and Confusion/Bewilderment; and range from 0-20 (higher scores = more negative mood state). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
| Enrollment: | 421 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | February 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo
|
Drug: Placebo
placebo
|
|
Pregabalin
Pregabalin 300mg/day (positive control), maintenance treatment 14 weeks
|
Drug: Pregabalin
pregabalin 300mg/day
Other Name: pregabalin
|
|
Experimental: GEn 1200mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 1200mg/day, maintenance treatment 14 weeks
|
Drug: GEn 1200mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 1200mg/day
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: GEn 2400mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 2400mg/day, maintenance treatment 14 weeks
|
Drug: GEn 2400mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 2400mg/day
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: GEn 3600mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 3600mg/day, maintanance treatment 14 weeks
|
Drug: GEn 3600mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 3600mg/day
Other Names:
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- 18 years or older
- Female subjects are eligible to enter if of non-childbearing potential or not lactating, has a negative pregnancy test and agrees to use a specified highly effective method for avoiding pregnancy
- Documented medical diagnosis of Type 1 or 2 diabetes including:
- Stable glycemic control for 3 months defined as <25% change of routine insulin, <50% change of routine oral anti-diabetic agent dose and HbA1c < 8%. (HbA1c of 8 to 11% eligible if attempts to improve diabetic control failed)
- DPN defined by:
- Bilateral reduced or absent reflexes at the ankles, or
- Bilateral impaired vibration, pinprick, fine touch or temperature perception in the distal lower extremities And
- Persistent distal burning or dull pain in the feet, or
- Persistent proximal aching pain in the legs, or
- Paroxysmal electric, shooting, stabbing pain, or
- Dysasthesias, or
- Evoked pain And
- history of pain for at least six months and no greater than five years attributed to DPN (refers to duration of pain)
- Baseline 24-hour average daily pain intensity score >4.0 as measured on an 11 point pain intensity numerical rating scale
- Provides written informed consent in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements
Exclusion criteria:
- Other chronic pain conditions not associated with DPN. However, the subject will not be excluded if:
- The pain condition is located at a different region of the body, and
- The pain intensity of this condition is not greater than the pain intensity of the DPN, and
- The subject can assess their DPN independently of other pain condition.
- Other causes of neuropathy or lower extremity pain
- Is unable to discontinue prohibited medications or non-drug therapies or procedures throughout the duration of the study
- Hepatic impairment defined as ALT or AST > 2x upper limit of normal (ULN) or alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin > 1.5x ULN
- Chronic hepatitis B or C
- Impaired renal function defined as either creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min or requiring hemodialysis
- Corrected QT (QTc) interval >450 msec or QTc interval >480 msec for patients with Bundle Branch Block
- Uncontrolled hypertension at screen (sitting systolic >160 mmHg and/or sitting diastolic >90 mmHg
- Current diagnosis of active epilepsy or any active seizure disorder requiring chronic therapy with antiepileptic drug(s)
- Medical condition or disorder that would interfere with the action, absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of GEn or pregabalin, or, in the investigator's judgment:
- Is considered to be clinically significant and could pose a safety concern or,
- Could interfere with the accurate assessment of safety or efficacy, or,
- Could potentially affect a subject's safety or study outcome
- Meets criteria defined by the DSM‑IV‑TR for a major depressive episode or for active significant psychiatric disorders within last year
- Depression in remission, with or without antidepressant treatment, may participate, unless stable antidepressant regimen is a prohibited medication
- Antidepressant medication may not be changed or discontinued to met entry criteria and must be stable for at least 3 months prior to enrollment
- History of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse (DSM‑IV‑TR). Benzodiazepines or atypical benzodiazepines as hypnotic sleep agents permitted
- Currently participating in another clinical study in which the subject is, or will be exposed to an investigational or non-investigational drug or device
- Has participated in a clinical study and was exposed to investigational or non-investigational drug or device:
- Within preceding month for studies unrelated to DPN, or
- Within six months for studies related to DPN
- Treated previously with GEn
- History of allergic or medically significant adverse reaction to investigational products (including gabapentin or pregabalin) or their excipients, acetaminophen or related compounds
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00643760
Hide Study Locations
Hide Study LocationsLocations
| United States, Alabama | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Alabaster, Alabama, United States, 35007 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Dothan, Alabama, United States, 36303 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Hoover, Alabama, United States, 35216 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Jasper, Alabama, United States, 35501 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States, 35662 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Northport, Alabama, United States, 35476 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States, 35406 | |
| United States, Arizona | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85210 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Peoria, Arizona, United States, 85381 - 4828 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Tempe, Arizona, United States, 85282 | |
| United States, Arkansas | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States, 71901 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205 | |
| United States, California | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Anaheim, California, United States, 92801 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Concord, California, United States, 94520 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Escondido, California, United States, 92026 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Fresno, California, United States, 93720 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Huntington Park, California, United States, 90255 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| La Jolla, California, United States, 92037 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Los Gatos, California, United States, 95032 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Mission Viejo, California, United States, 92691 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Northridge, California, United States, 91325 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Oxnard, California, United States, 93030 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Riverside, California, United States, 92506 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| San Diego, California, United States, 92117 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Santa Ana, California, United States, 92705 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Temecula, California, United States, 92591 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Westlake Village, California, United States, 91361 | |
| United States, Florida | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Brandon, Florida, United States, 33511 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33765 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33308 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33916 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Hallandale Beach, Florida, United States, 33009 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Hollywood, Florida, United States, 33021 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| New Port Richey, Florida, United States, 34652 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Ocala, Florida, United States, 34471 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Ormond Beach, Florida, United States, 32174 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33024 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| St. Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33702 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308 | |
| United States, Georgia | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Roswell, Georgia, United States, 30076 | |
| United States, Illinois | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Libertyville, Illinois, United States, 60048 | |
| United States, Indiana | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Evansville, Indiana, United States, 47714 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Evansville, Indiana, United States, 47713 | |
| United States, Kansas | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67207 | |
| United States, Maryland | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20852 | |
| United States, Massachusetts | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts, United States, 02481 | |
| United States, Michigan | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49048 | |
| United States, Mississippi | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States, 38654 | |
| United States, Missouri | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63117 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110 | |
| United States, Nevada | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89016 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89119 | |
| United States, New Mexico | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87108 | |
| United States, New York | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Flushing, New York, United States, 11365 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| New York, New York, United States, 10128 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| North Massapequa, New York, United States, 11758 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Rochester, New York, United States, 14609 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Staten Island, New York, United States, 10301 | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27408 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Salisbury, North Carolina, United States, 28144 | |
| United States, Ohio | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43623 | |
| United States, Oklahoma | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Norman, Oklahoma, United States, 73071 | |
| United States, Oregon | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97404 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Medford, Oregon, United States, 97501 | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States, 19056 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15243 | |
| United States, South Carolina | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Greer, South Carolina, United States, 29651 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464 | |
| United States, Tennessee | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Kingsport, Tennessee, United States, 37660 | |
| United States, Texas | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78238 | |
| United States, Virginia | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Alexandria, Virginia, United States, 22311 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Weber City, Virginia, United States, 24290 | |
| United States, Washington | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Spokane, Washington, United States, 99208 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Spokane, Washington, United States, 99202 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98405 | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Vancouver, Washington, United States, 98664 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
XenoPort, Inc.
Investigators
| Study Director: | GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | XenoPort, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00643760 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 110448 |
| Study First Received: | February 19, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | April 21, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | January 28, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by XenoPort, Inc.:
|
Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN) Neuropathic Pain |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Diabetic Neuropathies Neuralgia Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Demyelinating Diseases Polyneuropathies Nerve Compression Syndromes Neurologic Manifestations Neurotoxicity Syndromes Neuromuscular Diseases Nervous System Diseases Diabetes Complications Diabetes Mellitus Endocrine System Diseases Pain Signs and Symptoms |
Poisoning Substance-Related Disorders Gabapentin Pregabalin Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Analgesics Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Anticonvulsants Antiparkinson Agents Anti-Dyskinesia Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013