Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
A Study of Tocilizumab in Combination With DMARDs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (ROSE)
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.

First Received on September 18, 2007.   Last Updated on August 3, 2010   History of Changes
Sponsor: Hoffmann-La Roche
Information provided by: Hoffmann-La Roche
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00531817
  Purpose

This 2-arm study assessed the safety and efficacy, with regard to reduction in signs and symptoms, of tocilizumab versus placebo, both in combination with DMARDs, in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis, with an inadequate response to DMARDs. Patients were randomized in a ratio of 2:1 to receive either tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) or placebo IV every 4 weeks. All patients also received stable antirheumatic therapy, including permitted DMARDs. The anticipated time on study treatment was 3-12 months, and the target sample size was 500+ individuals.


Condition Intervention Phase
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Drug: tocilizumab
Drug: Placebo
Drug: Permitted DMARDs
Phase III

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tocilizumab (TCZ) Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Hoffmann-La Roche:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Percentage of Patients With an ACR50 Response [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percentage of patients with an ACR50 response (≥50% improvement from baseline) at Week 24.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR20 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR20 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR20 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR20 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR20 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 20 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR20 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR50 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR50 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR50 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR50 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR50 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 20 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR70 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR70 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR70 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR70 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR70 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 20 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Patients With ACR70 Response at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 4 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The DAS28 index uses a 28 joint count. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A score of <2.6 represents clinical remission, a score of ≤3.2 represents low disease activity, and a score of >5.1 represents severe disease.

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The DAS28 index uses a 28 joint count. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A score of <2.6 represents clinical remission, a score of ≤3.2 represents low disease activity, and a score of >5.1 represents severe disease.

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The DAS28 index uses a 28 joint count. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A score of <2.6 represents clinical remission, a score of ≤3.2 represents low disease activity, and a score of >5.1 represents severe disease.

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The DAS28 index uses a 28 joint count. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A score of <2.6 represents clinical remission, a score of ≤3.2 represents low disease activity, and a score of >5.1 represents severe disease.

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 20 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The DAS28 index uses a 28 joint count. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A score of <2.6 represents clinical remission, a score of ≤3.2 represents low disease activity, and a score of >5.1 represents severe disease.

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Each Timepoint [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The DAS28 index uses a 28 joint count. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A score of <2.6 represents clinical remission, a score of ≤3.2 represents low disease activity, and a score of >5.1 represents severe disease.


Enrollment: 614
Study Start Date: September 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: April 2011
Primary Completion Date: June 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg + DMARDs Drug: tocilizumab
Tocilizumab intravenously at a dose of 8 mg/kg over a 1-hour infusion, every 4 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions.
Other Names:
  • Actemra
  • RoActemra
Drug: Permitted DMARDs
As prescribed. The following DMARDs were permitted in this study: methotrexate (MTX), chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, parenteral gold, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, and leflunomide. These DMARDs could be used alone or in combination, except for the combination of MTX and leflunomide, which was not allowed.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + DMARDs Drug: Placebo
Placebo IV over a 1-hour infusion, every 4 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions.
Drug: Permitted DMARDs
As prescribed. The following DMARDs were permitted in this study: methotrexate (MTX), chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, parenteral gold, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, and leflunomide. These DMARDs could be used alone or in combination, except for the combination of MTX and leflunomide, which was not allowed.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, ≥18 years of age
  • Active rheumatoid arthritis of >6 months duration
  • Received permitted DMARDs each at a stable dose for at least 7 weeks prior to baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease or inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
  • Major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned within 6 months following randomization
  • Unsuccessful treatment with a biologic agent, including an anti-TNF agent
  • Previous treatment with tocilizumab
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00531817

  Show 157 Study Locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Hoffmann-La Roche
Investigators
Study Director: Clinical Trials Hoffmann-La Roche
  More Information

Additional Information:
No publications provided by Hoffmann-La Roche

Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: Disclosures Group, Hoffmann-La Roche
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00531817     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: ML21136
Study First Received: September 18, 2007
Results First Received: July 6, 2010
Last Updated: August 3, 2010
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Arthritis
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Joint Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Rheumatic Diseases
Connective Tissue Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
Immune System Diseases
Antirheumatic Agents
Therapeutic Uses
Pharmacologic Actions

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 09, 2012