|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | Cleveland Chiropractic College |
|---|---|
| Collaborators: |
Durban University of Technology South Africa Macquarie University, Australia |
| Information provided by: | Cleveland Chiropractic College |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00523172 |
Purpose
Purpose of this study is to examine the effect of chiropractic adjusting (manipulative therapy) and rehabilitation on hip osteoarthritis (hip OA) in older adults.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Osteoarthritis, Hip |
Procedure: manual or manipulative therapy Procedure: Manual / Manipulative Therapy Procedure: Supportive Care |
Phase 0 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Manipulative Protocols to Assess Changes in Pain, ROM, Quality of Life, Cost and Risk for Falls in Subjects With Hip Osteoarthritis |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 120 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2007 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | October 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A
1) Group A will receive 9 manipulative therapy treatments (adjustments) to one area: the hip with pre-manipulative static and post active-assisted stretch of tight hip muscles. After the last (or 9th) treatment these patients will receive general advice and recommendations on managing HOA and how to gently and safely increase general exercise. • Based on a previous trial, Group A treatment appears superior than placebo. There will be a 3, 6 and 9 month follow up. |
Procedure: manual or manipulative therapy
Active comparator will receive 9 treatments of manual or manipulative therapy to the hip (HVLA hip manipulations per protocol 1) with pre-manipulative static and post manipulative active-assisted stretch of hip muscles after each manipulation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B
2) Group B will receive 9 treatments with manipulative therapy treatments (adjustments) to the entire kinetic chain (five areas): the lumbosacral, sacroiliac, hip, knee, ankle and foot joints with pre-manipulative static and post active-assisted stretch of tight hip muscles. There will be a 3, 6 and 9 month follow up.
|
Procedure: Manual / Manipulative Therapy
Active comparator will receive 9 treatments of manual or manipulative therapy to the lumbosacral, sacroiliac, hip and knee, ankle and foot joints (HVLA and Grades I-IV mobilization per protocol 2) stretching and exercise.)
|
|
Supportive Care
Supportive Care 3) Groups A and B will receive supportive care after the 9th visit consisting of (up to a maximum of) 6 visits, PRN or as needed, until the 9 month follow up. This is to see if peak gains may be maintained (as noted in the previous trial) throughout the follow up period. Enrolled subjects will commonly receive 2 treatments per week (occasionally, less or more than 1 to 2 treatments per week due to (College or University) semester breaks, exams, clinic closures and so forth) until 9 treatments are completed. |
Procedure: Supportive Care
Supportive Care 3) Groups A and B will receive supportive care after the 9th visit consisting of (up to a maximum of) 6 visits, PRN or as needed, until the 9 month follow up. This is to see if peak gains may be maintained (as noted in the previous trial) throughout the follow up period. Enrolled subjects will commonly receive 2 treatments per week (occasionally, less or more than 1 to 2 treatments per week due to (College or University) semester breaks, exams, clinic closures and so forth) until 9 treatments are completed. |
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 40 Years to 85 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of concurrent subluxation complex
* Diagnosis of subluxation complex (aka segmental joint dysfunction) will be supported throughout using the PART(S) system.
Exclusion Criteria:
General and internal medical disorders such as:
Contacts and Locations| United States, California | |
| Cleveland Chiropractic College Health Center | |
| Los Angeles, California, United States, 90004 | |
| Australia | |
| Macquarie University | |
| Sydney, Australia | |
| South Africa | |
| Durban University of Technology | |
| Durban, South Africa | |
| Principal Investigator: | James Brantingham, D.C., Ph.D. | Cleveland Chiropractic College |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | James W Brantingham, DC, PhD, Cleveland Chiropractic College |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00523172 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | IRB08102007 |
| Study First Received: | August 29, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | July 16, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
|
Chiropractic Manipulation |
|
Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis, Hip Arthritis |
Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Rheumatic Diseases |