|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. |
|---|---|
| Collaborator: |
Tibotec Therapeutics, a Division of Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., USA |
| Information provided by: | Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00344422 |
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine how well newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients respond to an experimental regimen of Vincristine, DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection) and Dexamethasone (VDD) versus the standard treatment of Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD).
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Multiple Myeloma Myeloma M-Protein Myeloma Proteins |
Drug: Vincristine, DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposomal injection), and Dexamethasone (VDD) vs. Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD) |
Phase III |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Multi-Center Randomized Study of Vincristine, Doxil and Dexamethasone vs. Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Multiple Myeloma |
| Enrollment: | 198 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2000 |
| Study Completion Date: | June 2004 |
This is a randomized, open label study comparing the efficacy, clinical benefit, toxicity and safety of the combination of Vincristine, DOXIL® (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection), and Dexamethasone (VDD) to the standard regimen of Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VAD) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Approximately 200 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma will be randomized to receive either VDD or VAD. This study will determine and compare the objective response rate (the percentage of patients who attain an Objective Status of Complete Remission, Remission or Partial Remission) for patients receiving VDD vs. VAD. This study will also evaluate and compare the clinical benefit of VDD vs. VAD for the following measures: Hospitalization; Documented sepsis; Antibiotic use; Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever.
VDD: Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV on Day 1; Doxil® 40 mg/m2 IV on Day 1; Dexamethasone 40 mg/day oral Days 1-4; VAD: Vincristine 0.4 mg/day continuous infusion Days 1-4; Doxorubicin 9.0 mg/m2/day continuous infusion Days 1-4; Dexamethasone 40 mg/day orally on Days 1-4; Every 28 days for 4 cycles
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| Study Director: | Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial | Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. |
More Information
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00344422 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CR002434 |
| Study First Received: | June 23, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | June 8, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
|
Anthracyclines Liposomes Liposomal Vincristine Doxorubicin |
Dexamethasone Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin DOXIL drug resistant myeloma |
|
Multiple Myeloma Neoplasms, Plasma Cell Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Hemostatic Disorders Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Paraproteinemias Blood Protein Disorders Hematologic Diseases Hemorrhagic Disorders Lymphoproliferative Disorders Immunoproliferative Disorders Immune System Diseases Dexamethasone acetate |
Dexamethasone Dexamethasone 21-phosphate Doxorubicin Vincristine BB 1101 Anti-Inflammatory Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Antiemetics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Central Nervous System Agents Gastrointestinal Agents Glucocorticoids |