Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
COREG MR Versus TOPROL-XL On The Lipid Profile Of Normolipidemic Or Mildly Dyslipidemic Patients With Hypertension
This study has been completed.

First Received on January 5, 2006.   Last Updated on August 11, 2011   History of Changes
Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline
Information provided by: GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00273052
  Purpose

This study was designed to determine whether treatment with COREG MR is more effective at maintaining a better lipid profile than treatment with TOPROL-XL for hypertension.


Condition Intervention Phase
Dyslipidaemia
Hypertension
Drug: Carvedilol Phosphate modified release formulation
Drug: metoprolol succinate
Phase 3

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Effects of Carvedilol Phosphate Modified Release Formulation (COREG- MR) With Metoprolol Succinate (TOPROL XL) on the Lipid Profile in Normolipidemic, or Mildly Dyslipidemic Hypertensive Patients

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by GlaxoSmithKline:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for triglyceride levels. Full beta quantification test performed which uses ultracentrifugation to partially separate lipoprotein classes and is the basis for the reference methods. Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) Levels by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for HDL-C levels. Full beta Quant test performed with HDL subclasses. Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Change From Baseline in Log Transformed High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for hs-CRP. Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in Log Transformed Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2 (LpPLA2) by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for LpPLA2 activity. Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Manual physical examination (cuff blood pressure). Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in Heart Rate by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Manual physical examination. Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value. (BPM=beats per minute)

  • Change From Baseline in Weight by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Manual physical examination. Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in Additional Lipid Parameters by Treatment Group With Unit of Measures of mg/dL at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for lipid levels. Full beta Quant test performed with HDL subclasses and IDL. IDL=Intermediate density lipoproteins, LDL=Low-density lipoprotein, VLDL=Very Low density lipoprotein, HDL=High-density lipoprotein. Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in Additional Lipid Parameters by Treatment Group With Unit of Measures of g/L at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for lipid levels. Full beta Quant test performed. Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin (Glycemic Parameter) by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for glycemia levels. Full beta Quant test performed. Test for Fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin. Homeostasis model Assessment (HOMA) is a computer-generated model consisting of non-linear empirical equations solved numerically to predict glucose, Insulin and C-peptide concentrations in fasting subjects for insulin sensitivity (%S). Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (Glycemic Parameter) by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for glycemia levels. Full beta Quant test performed. Test for Fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin. Homeostasis model Assessment (HOMA) is a computer-generated model consisting of non-linear empirical equations solved numerically to predict glucose, Insulin and C-peptide concentrations in fasting subjects for insulin sensitivity (%S). Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in c-Peptide (Glycemic Parameter) by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for glycemia levels. Full beta Quant test performed. Test for Fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin. Homeostasis model Assessment (HOMA) is a computer-generated model consisting of non-linear empirical equations solved numerically to predict glucose, Insulin and C-peptide concentrations in fasting subjects for insulin sensitivity (%S). Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment (Glycemic Parameter) by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for glycemia levels. Full beta Quant test performed. Test for Fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin. Homeostasis model Assessment (HOMA) is a computer-generated model consisting of non-linear empirical equations solved numerically to predict glucose, Insulin and C-peptide concentrations in fasting subjects for insulin sensitivity (%S). Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.

  • Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) (Glycemic Parameter) by Treatment Group at Maintenance Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Blood draw for glycemia levels. Full beta Quant test performed. Test for Fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin. Homeostasis model Assessment (HOMA) is a computer-generated model consisting of non-linear empirical equations solved numerically to predict glucose, Insulin and C-peptide concentrations in fasting subjects for insulin sensitivity (%S). Change = Month 6 value minus Baseline value.


Enrollment: 514
Study Start Date: January 2006
Study Completion Date: December 2007
Primary Completion Date: December 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Carvedilol Phosphate modified release formulation Drug: Carvedilol Phosphate modified release formulation
Active Comparator: metoprolol succinate Drug: metoprolol succinate
Other Names:
  • Carvedilol Phosphate modified release formulation
  • metoprolol succinate

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 80 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented history of hypertension
  • Triglycerides of 120-400 mg/mL
  • LDLc levels not requiring lipid lowering medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has known contraindication to alpha- or beta-blocker therapy.
  • Has taken any non-ocular beta-blockers within three months before screening.
  • Has Type I or II diabetes.
  • Taking lipid lowering medications.
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00273052

  Show 105 Study Locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline
Investigators
Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials GlaxoSmithKline
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Cheri Hudson; Clinical Disclosure Advisor, GSK Clinical Disclosure
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00273052     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: COR103561
Study First Received: January 5, 2006
Results First Received: December 19, 2008
Last Updated: August 11, 2011
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration

Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline:
hypertension

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Hypertension
Dyslipidemias
Vascular Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Lipid Metabolism Disorders
Metabolic Diseases
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Metoprolol succinate
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
Cardiovascular Agents
Therapeutic Uses
Pharmacologic Actions
Antihypertensive Agents
Sympatholytics
Autonomic Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
Adrenergic Antagonists
Adrenergic Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Vasodilator Agents
Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 24, 2012