Efficacy and Safety of the DTS-G2 System in Patients With Axillary Hyperhidrosis (DRI-UP)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Miramar Labs
Information provided by:
Miramar Labs
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00931359
First received: June 28, 2009
Last updated: June 13, 2011
Last verified: June 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: April 15, 2011
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis, Axilla |
| Interventions: |
Device: DTS-G2 System Device: DTS System (Sham treatment) |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Sham Treatment | Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions. |
| Treatment With DTS-G2 System | Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Sham Treatment | Treatment With DTS-G2 System | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 39 | 81 |
| COMPLETED | 33 | 68 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 6 | 13 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Sham Treatment | Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions. |
| Treatment With DTS-G2 System | Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Sham Treatment | Treatment With DTS-G2 System | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
39 | 81 | 120 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|||
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 39 | 80 | 119 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
34.1 ± 11.2 | 32.2 ± 10.7 | 32.8 ± 10.8 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 26 | 44 | 70 |
| Male | 13 | 37 | 50 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| United States | 39 | 81 | 120 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at 30 Days. [ Time Frame: 30 days post-treatment ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at 30 Days. |
| Measure Description |
The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) is a validated scale for measuring the effect of excessive sweating on the quality of life. It is a 4-point scale, with the following descriptors:
|
| Time Frame | 30 days post-treatment |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Intent to Treat Population was used. Last Observation Carry Forward was used for missing data. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Sham Treatment | Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions. |
| Treatment With DTS-G2 System | Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J. |
Measured Values
| Sham Treatment | Treatment With DTS-G2 System | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
39 | 81 |
|
Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at 30 Days.
[units: Percentage of Participants] |
54 | 89 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at 30 Days.
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Factors of treatment group and analysis center were considered | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| 2. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 6 Month Follow-up Visit. [ Time Frame: 6 months post-treatment ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 6 Month Follow-up Visit. |
| Measure Description |
The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) is a validated scale for measuring the effect of excessive sweating on the quality of life. It is a 4-point scale, with the following descriptors:
|
| Time Frame | 6 months post-treatment |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Sham Treatment | Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions. |
| Treatment With DTS-G2 System | Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J. |
Measured Values
| Sham Treatment | Treatment With DTS-G2 System | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
39 | 81 |
|
Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 6 Month Follow-up Visit.
[units: Percentage of Participants] |
44 | 67 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Percentage of Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 6 Month Follow-up Visit.
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.019 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| 3. Secondary: | Percentage of Treatment Group Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 12 Month Visit [ Time Frame: 12 months ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage of Treatment Group Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 12 Month Visit |
| Measure Description |
The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) is a 4-point validated scale for measuring the effect of excessive sweating.
|
| Time Frame | 12 months |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Sham group subjects exited the study after the 6 month follow-up visit, so were not in the study at this timepoint. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Sham Treatment | Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions. |
| Treatment With DTS-G2 System | Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J. |
Measured Values
| Sham Treatment | Treatment With DTS-G2 System | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
0 | 81 |
|
Percentage of Treatment Group Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 12 Month Visit
[units: Percentage of Participants] |
69 |
No statistical analysis provided for Percentage of Treatment Group Subjects That Report an HDSS Score of 1 or 2 at the 12 Month Visit
| 4. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects With Reported Adverse Events [ Time Frame: 6 months post-treatment ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage of Subjects With Reported Adverse Events |
| Measure Description | Adverse events were defined in the protocol and included anticipated side effects of the procedure. These events were tracked by the clinical site and did include subject-reported events. The events reported here only included side effects that were attributed by the principal investigator as being possibly to definitely related to the device or procedure. They did not include expected treatment effects, such as swelling or bruising in the treatment area. |
| Time Frame | 6 months post-treatment |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Sham Treatment | Subjects received a sham treatment in two treatment sessions. |
| Treatment With DTS-G2 System | Subjects received treatment in one to three treatment sessions with fixed device settings. Settings were at a generator output energy of 220J. |
Measured Values
| Sham Treatment | Treatment With DTS-G2 System | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
39 | 81 |
|
Percentage of Subjects With Reported Adverse Events
[units: Percentage of Participants] |
13 | 28 |
No statistical analysis provided for Percentage of Subjects With Reported Adverse Events
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| Sham subjects exited the study at 6 months, so group comparisons are not possible for later timepoints. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Kathy O'Shaughnessy, PhD
Organization: Miramar Labs
phone: 408-940-8700
e-mail: kathyo@miramarlabs.com
Organization: Miramar Labs
phone: 408-940-8700
e-mail: kathyo@miramarlabs.com
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Kathy O'Shaughnessy, VP Clinical/Regulatory, Miramar Labs, Inc |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00931359 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CP-0003 |
| Study First Received: | June 28, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | April 15, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | June 13, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |