Polysomnography Study of GSK1838262 (XP13512) Extended Release Tablets Versus Placebo in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) and Associated Sleep Disturbance
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
XenoPort, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
XenoPort, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00748098
First received: September 5, 2008
Last updated: January 28, 2013
Last verified: January 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: April 21, 2011
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Restless Legs Syndrome Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) |
| Interventions: |
Drug: GSK1838262 Extended Release Tablets Drug: Placebo |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo Followed by GEn 1200 mg/Day | Participants randomized to matching placebo administered once daily with food at 5 pm during the 28-day First Treatment Intervention Period and the 7-day First Taper Period. No treatment was given during the 7-day Washout. Gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) 1200 mg/day administered once daily with food at 5 pm during the 28-day Second Treatment Intervention Period (Days 1-3, 600 mg). GEn 600 mg administered once daily with food at 5 pm during the 7-day Second Taper Period. No treatment was given during Follow-up. |
| GEn 1200 mg/Day Followed by Placebo | Participants randomized to GEn 1200 mg/day administered once daily with food at 5 pm during the 28-day First Treatment Intervention Period (Days 1-3, 600 mg). GEn 600 mg administered once daily with food at 5 pm during the 7-day First Taper Period. No treatment was given during 7-day Washout. Matching placebo administered once daily with food at 5 pm during the 28-day Second Treatment Intervention Period and the 7-day Second Taper Period. No treatment was given during Follow-up. |
Participant Flow for 5 periods
Period 1: First Treatment Intervention Period
| Placebo Followed by GEn 1200 mg/Day | GEn 1200 mg/Day Followed by Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 69 | 67 |
| COMPLETED | 64 | 66 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 5 | 1 |
| Adverse Event | 1 | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 0 |
Period 2: First Taper Period
| Placebo Followed by GEn 1200 mg/Day | GEn 1200 mg/Day Followed by Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 64 | 66 |
| COMPLETED | 61 | 65 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 0 |
| Protocol Stopping Criteria Met | 0 | 1 |
Period 3: 1-Week Washout Period
| Placebo Followed by GEn 1200 mg/Day | GEn 1200 mg/Day Followed by Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 61 | 65 |
| COMPLETED | 59 | 64 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 2 | 1 |
| Adverse Event | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 0 |
Period 4: Second Treatment Intervention Period
| Placebo Followed by GEn 1200 mg/Day | GEn 1200 mg/Day Followed by Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 59 | 64 |
| COMPLETED | 53 | 61 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 6 | 3 |
| Adverse Event | 4 | 1 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 |
Period 5: Second Taper Period
| Placebo Followed by GEn 1200 mg/Day | GEn 1200 mg/Day Followed by Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 53 | 61 |
| COMPLETED | 53 | 61 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| All Participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population | All randomized participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline polysomnography (PSG) efficacy assessment |
Baseline Measures
| All Participants in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
131 |
|
Age
[1] [units: Years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
52.0 ± 12.70 |
|
Gender
[1] [units: Participants] |
|
| Female | 76 |
| Male | 55 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[1] [units: participants] |
|
| African American/African Heritage | 7 |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 |
| Asian | 1 |
| White | 120 |
| Mixed Race | 1 |
| [1] | Baseline characteristics were collected for all participants prior to the Baseline period and are summarized independent of treatment sequence. The ITT Population consisted of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational product, and had at least one post-baseline polysomnography (PSG) sleep efficacy assessment. |
|---|
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Wake Time During Sleep (WTDS) at Week 4/10 Measured by Polysomnography (PSG) (Sleep Study) Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Periodic Limb Movements Associated With Arousal (PLMAI) at Week 4/10 as Measured by Polysomnography Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 2| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Periodic Limb Movements Associated With Arousal (PLMAI) at Week 4/10 as Measured by Polysomnography Using LOCF |
| Measure Description | PLMAI is defined as the number of Periodic Limb Movements (PLMs or involuntary jerks of the legs that cause a participant to arouse from sleep per hour of sleep). Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 4 and Week 10 values minus the baseline value. Mean change from baseline was adjusted for treatment, pooled center, and period effects. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| ITT Population: Of the 131 ITT participants, 2 and 6 participants did not take Placebo and GEn 1200 mg, respectively, in the second period. In addition, 6 placebo and 4 GEn 1200 participants did not have PSG data during the second intervention period and were therefore not included in this analysis. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo once daily either in first intervention period or second intervention period |
| GEn 1200 mg | GEn 1200 mg once daily either in first intervention period or second intervention period |
Measured Values
| Placebo | GEn 1200 mg | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
123 | 121 |
|
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Periodic Limb Movements Associated With Arousal (PLMAI) at Week 4/10 as Measured by Polysomnography Using LOCF
[units: limb movements per hour] Least Squares Mean ± Standard Error |
-1.52 ± 0.892 | -4.59 ± 0.899 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Periodic Limb Movements Associated With Arousal (PLMAI) at Week 4/10 as Measured by Polysomnography Using LOCF
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.002 |
| Adjusted mean difference versus placebo [4] | -3.07 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -5.04 to -1.10 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Estimates were obtained using an ANCOVA model with period, group center, and treatment as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 3. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the International Restless Legs Rating Scale (IRLS) Total Score at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Item 4 (Sleep Disturbance) Scores of the IRLS Rating Scale at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Time Spent in N1 Sleep as Measured by Polysomnography at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Total Sleep Time Spent in the N1 Sleep Stage at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Time Spent in the N2 Sleep Stage as Measured by Polysomnography at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Total Sleep Time Spent in the N2 Sleep Stage at Week 4/10 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Time Spent in Stage N3 Sleep Time at Week 4/10 Measured by PSG Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Total Sleep Time Spent in the N3 Sleep Stage at Week 4/10 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Time Spent in the REM (Rapid Eye Movement) Sleep Stage at Week 4/10 as Measured by Polysomnography Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Total Sleep Time Spent in the REM Sleep Stage at Week 4/10 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Periodic Limb Movements Causing Awakening (PLMAWI) at Week 4/10 as Measured by Polysomnography Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Number of PLMAI Responders at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality at Week 4/10 as Measured by the Subjective Post Sleep Diary (SPSD) Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Participant’s Ratings of Feeling Rested Upon Awakening as Measured by the Subjective Post Sleep Diary (SPSD) at Week 4/10 Using LOCF. [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Awakenings Measured Objectively by Polysomnography at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Self-reported Number of Hours Spent Awake During the Night (SPSD) Due to RLS at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 19. Secondary: | Number of Participants With no Self-reported Awakenings (SPSD) Due to RLS at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 20. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Sleep Time Measured by Polysomnography (PSG) at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 21. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Sleep Efficiency Measured by Polysomnography (PSG) at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 22. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) Measured by Polysomnography (PSG) at Week 4/10 Using LOCF. [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 23. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Suggested Immobilization Test (SIT) PLM Index at Week 4/10 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 24. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the SIT MDS (Mean Leg Discomfort Score), Mean of Scores From 0 to 60 Minutes, at Week 4/10 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 25. Secondary: | Number of Participants Who Responded Affirmatively to Each of the 4 Items of the Participant-completed Patient Global Impression of Therapy at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 26. Secondary: | Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Illness – Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 27. Secondary: | Number of Participants Who Were Defined as Clinical Global Impression of Illness (CGI-I) Scale "Responders" at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
| 28. Secondary: | Number of Participants Who Self-reported “Very Satisfied” or “Satisfied” With the Investigational Product at Week 4/10 Using LOCF [ Time Frame: Week 4/10 (representing the last week of each intervention period, i.e. Weeks 4 and 10) ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: GSK Response Center
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
Organization: GlaxoSmithKline
phone: 866-435-7343
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | XenoPort, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00748098 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | RXP110908 |
| Study First Received: | September 5, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | April 21, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | January 28, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |