ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +3.0 D Add Power Intraocular Lens (IOL)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Alcon Research
Information provided by:
Alcon Research
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00684138
First received: May 22, 2008
Last updated: July 6, 2010
Last verified: July 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: January 30, 2009
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Single Blind (Subject); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Cataract |
| Interventions: |
Device: ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +4.0 D Add Power Intraocular Lens Device: ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +3.0 D Add Power Intraocular Lens |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Only adult subjects of either gender or any race in need of cataract extraction in both eyes were considered for enrollment. 280 subjects were implanted bilaterally with either the ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +3.0 D Add Power IOL Model SN6AD1 or the ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +4.0 D Add Power IOL Model SN6AD3 based upon a 1:1 randomization. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| Subjects were examined to ensure inclusion/exclusion criteria. Only subjects who signed an informed consent and qualified to be in the study were enrolled. Subject numbers were assigned after obtaining consent meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Subjects were considered enrolled once implanted in the first operative eye. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® +3.0 | ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +3.0 D Add Power Intraocular Lens |
| ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +4.0 | ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +4.0 D Add Power Intraocular Lens |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® +3.0 | ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +4.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 141 | 139 |
| COMPLETED | 138 | 131 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 8 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® +3.0 | ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +3.0 D Add Power Intraocular Lens |
| ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +4.0 | ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +4.0 D Add Power Intraocular Lens |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® +3.0 | ACRYSOF® ReSTOR® Aspheric +4.0 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
141 | 139 | 280 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|||
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 51 | 40 | 91 |
| >=65 years | 90 | 99 | 189 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 95 | 97 | 192 |
| Male | 46 | 42 | 88 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Binocular Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity at Best Distance (That Which Provides the Subject With the Best Vision) [ Time Frame: 3 months ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Binocular Distance Corrected Distance Visual Acuity [ Time Frame: 3 months post-operative ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Binocular Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (Tested at 50 cm) [ Time Frame: 3 months post-operative ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Binocular Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (Tested at 60 cm) [ Time Frame: 3 months post-operative ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Binocular Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (Tested at 70 cm) [ Time Frame: 3 months post-operative ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| Data from one investigator, who implanted 20 subjects, were excluded from analysis due to non compliance with data collection and documentation. This resulted in 280 implanted subjects that were considered evaluable. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Alcon Clinical
Organization: Alcon Research, Ltd.
phone: 888.451.3937; 817.568.6725
e-mail: medinfo@alconlabs.com
Organization: Alcon Research, Ltd.
phone: 888.451.3937; 817.568.6725
e-mail: medinfo@alconlabs.com
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Tonya Tubbs Jones, Alcon |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00684138 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | C-06-40 |
| Study First Received: | May 22, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | January 30, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | July 6, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |