|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized; Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Conditions: |
Bacterial Vaginosis Urogenital Infection by Trichomonas Vaginalis |
| Interventions: |
Device: OSOM Trichomonas Rapid Test Device: OSOM BVBlue Test |
Participant Flow
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Symptomatic | Women who presented with one or more symptoms of vaginitis including abnormal vaginal odor, abnormal vaginal discharge, pruritis, vaginal burning or pain, vaginal irritation, or lower abdominal pain. |
| Asymptomatic | Women who presented without any symptoms of vaginitis (abnormal vaginal odor, abnormal vaginal discharge, pruritis, vaginal burning or pain, vaginal irritation, or lower abdominal pain). |
| Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 251 | 268 |
| COMPLETED | 251 | 268 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Symptomatic | Women who presented with one or more symptoms of vaginitis including abnormal vaginal odor, abnormal vaginal discharge, pruritis, vaginal burning or pain, vaginal irritation, or lower abdominal pain. |
| Asymptomatic | Women who presented without any symptoms of vaginitis (abnormal vaginal odor, abnormal vaginal discharge, pruritis, vaginal burning or pain, vaginal irritation, or lower abdominal pain). |
| Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
251 | 268 | 519 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|||
| <=18 years | 12 | 16 | 28 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 239 | 252 | 491 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
28.3 ± 8.2 | 27.0 ± 8.7 | 27.6 ± 8.6 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 251 | 268 | 519 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| United States | 251 | 268 | 519 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Sensitivity of the OSOM Rapid Test and PCR Wet Mount Microscopy in Diagnosing Trichomonas Vaginalis in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Women [ Time Frame: Visit 1 ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Specificity of the OSOM Rapid Test and PCR Wet Mount Microscopy in Diagnosing Trichomonas Vaginalis in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Women [ Time Frame: Visit 1 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Sensitivity of the BVBlue Test and Amsel Criteria in Diagnosing BV in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Women. [ Time Frame: Visit 1 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Specificity of the BVBlue Test and Amsel Criteria in Diagnosing BV in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Women. [ Time Frame: Visit 1 ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| A major limitation of this study was that in the first 122 women, 24% of the cohort, the vaginal swabs used for the diagnostic tests were collected in random order, which resulted in decreased sensitivity of the OSOM Rapid and BVBLue tests. |
| Responsible Party: | University of Pittsburgh |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00682851 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | PRO08020012 |
| Study First Received: | May 16, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | July 8, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | August 25, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |