Treatment Effect of Saxagliptin Compared With Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Renal Impairment
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
AstraZeneca
Collaborator:
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Information provided by:
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00614939
First received: January 31, 2008
Last updated: May 16, 2011
Last verified: May 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: June 7, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Type 2 Diabetes |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Saxagliptin Drug: Placebo |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| A total of 572 participants were enrolled in the study; 561 entered the Lead-in period and 170 patients were randomized and treated. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo |
| Saxa | Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Placebo | Saxa | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 85 [1] | 85 [1] |
| COMPLETED | 50 [2] | 42 [2] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 35 | 43 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 10 | 17 |
| Study specific discontinuation criteris | 13 | 16 |
| Adverse Event | 2 | 5 |
| Incorrect enrollment | 1 | 2 |
| Death | 4 | 3 |
| Poor/non-compliance | 4 | 0 |
| Hospitalized due to kidney transplant | 1 | 0 |
| [1] | Randomized and treated |
|---|---|
| [2] | Completed 52 weeks of treatment |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo |
| Saxa | Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Placebo | Saxa | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
85 | 85 | 170 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
66.2 ± 9.08 | 66.8 ± 8.27 | 66.5 ± 8.66 |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Female | 44 | 53 | 97 |
| Male | 41 | 32 | 73 |
|
Baseline Renal Impairment Category
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Moderate | 42 | 48 | 90 |
| Severe | 23 | 18 | 41 |
| End-Stage | 20 | 19 | 39 |
|
Baseline Diabetes Therapy
[units: participants] |
|||
| Diabetes Therapy | 84 | 83 | 167 |
| Insulin | 57 | 71 | 128 |
| Oral blood glucose lowering drug | 30 | 23 | 53 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level to Week 12 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) [ Time Frame: Baseline , Week 12 (LOCF) ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF)- Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF) ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF) ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF) ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF) ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF) ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12 (LOCF) - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 (LOCF) ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level to Week 52 [ Time Frame: Baseline , Week 52 ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 9| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup |
| Measure Description | Adjusted* mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) achieved with saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily versus placebo at Week 52 (Full Analysis Set) for the moderate renal impairment subgroup. FPG is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated at the Week 52 value minus the baseline value. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment. To be included in analysis: change from baseline to Week 52 for efficacy, subjects must have had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Data were excluded after changes in oral blood glucose lowering drug or insulin. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo |
| Saxa | Saxagliptin 2.5 mg once daily oral dose |
Measured Values
| Placebo | Saxa | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
40 | 44 |
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup
[units: mg/dL] Mean ± Standard Error |
||
| Baseline | 162.33 ± 8.933 | 202.82 ± 9.858 |
| Week 52 | 174.83 ± 11.295 | 177.43 ± 7.637 |
| Adjusted mean change | 3.02 ± 13.277 | -14.96 ± 12.873 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Mean Difference (Net) [2] | -17.98 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 18.475 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -54.28 to 18.33 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
|
Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: Due to a statistically significant treatment-by-baseline renal impairment interaction, fasting plasma glucose results were analyzed separately for each baseline renal impairment category. |
|
| [2] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 10. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Moderate Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - Severe Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52 - End-Stage Renal Impairment Subgroup [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided by AstraZeneca
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided by AstraZeneca
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Peter Ohman, MD, PhD, Medical Science Director, AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00614939 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D1680C00007, EudraCT number 2007-004951-12 |
| Study First Received: | January 31, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | June 7, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | May 16, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Belarus: Ministry of Health Croatia: Ministry of Health and Social Care Czech Republic: State Institute for Drug Control Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Hungary: National Institute of Pharmacy Latvia: State Agency of Medicines Lithuania: State Medicine Control Agency - Ministry of Health Poland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products Romania: National Medicines Agency Russia: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Ukraine: State Pharmacological Center - Ministry of Health |