Clinical Comparison of the Disposable Laryngeal Tube Suction, Esophageal Tracheal Combitube and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Information provided by:
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00581386
First received: December 20, 2007
Last updated: March 3, 2010
Last verified: March 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: July 28, 2009
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Single Blind (Subject); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Intubation Endotracheal |
| Interventions: |
Device: LTS-D Device: ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Device: Esophageal Tracheal Combitube (ETC) |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Patients were recruited from the Memorial Hermann Hospital between 05/30/2007 and 04/15/2009. The patients enrolled were undergoing general anesthesia. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| There were no enrolled participants excluded from trial before assignment to groups. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Disposable Laryngeal Tube Suction (LTS-D) | Patients were randomly distributed into this group. The patients assigned to this group were intubated using a new LMA device the LTS-D. |
| Esophageal Tracheal Combitube(ETC) | Patients were randomly assigned into this group. The patients assisgned to this group were intubated with the device ETC. |
| ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) | Patients were randomly assigned into this group. The patients in this group were intubated with the device PLMA. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Disposable Laryngeal Tube Suction (LTS-D) | Esophageal Tracheal Combitube(ETC) | ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 73 [1] | 73 [1] | 72 [1] |
| COMPLETED | 73 [2] | 73 [2] | 72 [2] |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| [1] | 05/30/2007 |
|---|---|
| [2] | 04/15/2009 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Disposable Laryngeal Tube Suction (LTS-D) | Patients were randomly distributed into this group. The patients assigned to this group were intubated using a new LMA device the LTS-D. |
| Esophageal Tracheal Combitube(ETC) | Patients were randomly assigned into this group. The patients assisgned to this group were intubated with the device ETC. |
| ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) | Patients were randomly assigned into this group. The patients in this group were intubated with the device PLMA. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Disposable Laryngeal Tube Suction (LTS-D) | Esophageal Tracheal Combitube(ETC) | ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
73 | 73 | 72 | 218 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
||||
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 73 | 73 | 72 | 218 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
41.84 ± 14.95 | 39.45 ± 13.73 | 40.08 ± 13.68 | 40.47 ± 14.12 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
||||
| Female | 23 | 23 | 17 | 63 |
| Male | 50 | 50 | 55 | 155 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
||||
| United States | 73 | 73 | 72 | 218 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Duration of Intubation [ Time Frame: duration of intubation ] |
| 2. Primary: | Number of Participants With a Successful First Attempt Placement [ Time Frame: Time taken for successful placement ] |
| 3. Primary: | Number of Patients Who Required Multiple Attempts. [ Time Frame: Time taken for intubation ] |
| 4. Primary: | Leak Pressures [ Time Frame: Duration of surgery ] |
| 5. Primary: | Post Operative Morbidity [ Time Frame: 2 hrs and 24 hrs after surgery ] |
| 6. Primary: | Number of Failed Cases [ Time Frame: Time taken for successful intubation ] |