Open Label Study of Adalimumab in Subjects Who Have a Sub-optimal Response to Systemic Therapy or Phototherapy
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Abbott
Information provided by:
Abbott
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00566722
First received: December 1, 2007
Last updated: April 8, 2011
Last verified: April 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: April 28, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Psoriasis |
| Intervention: |
Biological: adalimumab |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Patients who were previously treated with etanercept, methotrexate (MTX), or narrow-band ultraviolet-B (NB-UVB) and had a sub-optimal response were recruited for participation in the study. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| Participants who were receiving more than 1 of the treatments (etanercept, MTX, NB-UVB) at the time of screening must have discontinued 1 therapy (e.g., MTX) at least 30 days before first dose of adalimumab and must have discontinued the other therapy (e.g., NB-UVB) during a specified time before first dose of adalimumab. See Detailed Description. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Sub-optimal Response to MTX | MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse. |
| Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B | NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse. |
| Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept | Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Sub-optimal Response to MTX | Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B | Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept | |
|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 41 | 29 | 82 |
| COMPLETED | 39 | 24 | 73 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Did not meet exclusion criteria | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Serious adverse event | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Noncompliant with drug administration | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Sub-optimal Response to MTX | MTX treatment must have been administered for at least 4 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last dose of methotrexate must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse. |
| Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B | NB-UVB must have been administered for at least 2 consecutive months prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability. If there had been a treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the length of treatment interruption could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability (regardless of the length of the treatment interruptions), the participant was not eligible. The last treatment with NB UV-B must have been at least 4 days but not more than 10 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of moderate (3) or worse. |
| Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept | Etanercept treatment must have been administered for at least 6 consecutive months (or at least 3 consecutive months with deterioration of efficacy observed during the 3 months) prior to Screening, with no treatment interruptions except for toxicity or intolerability, at doses of 50 mg every other week, 50 mg every week, or 25 mg every other week. A treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability could not have exceeded 14 days. If there was more than one treatment interruption due to toxicity or intolerability, the participant was not eligible. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 11 days but not more than 17 days before the first dose of adalimumab. Suboptimal response was defined as a Physician's Global Assessment of mild (2) or worse. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Sub-optimal Response to MTX | Sub-optimal Response to Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B | Sub-optimal Response to Etanercept | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
41 | 29 | 82 | 152 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
47.4 ± 13.11 | 45.7 ± 14.60 | 48.3 ± 13.70 | 47.6 ± 13.67 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
||||
| Female | 13 | 13 | 35 | 61 |
| Male | 28 | 16 | 47 | 91 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
||||
| United States | 26 | 10 | 70 | 106 |
| Canada | 15 | 19 | 12 | 46 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Number of Participants Who Achieved a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 16 ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Number of Participants Achieving a PGA of Clear (0) at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 16 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Number of Participants Achieving at Least 1 Grade of Improvement in PGA at Week 16 Compared to Screening [ Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Number of Participants Achieving 0 or 1 on Patient's Global Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 [ Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, and 8 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score [ Time Frame: From Screening to Week 4 and Week 16 ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Number of Participants Achieving DLQI Total Score of 0 at Week 4 and Week 16 [ Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 16 ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Psoriasis-related Pruritus Assessment [ Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16 ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Involving Psoriatic Plaques and/or Psoriatic Arthritis [ Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16 ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Percent Work Time Missed Due to Psoriasis [ Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16 ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to Psoriasis [ Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16 ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Percent Impairment While Working Due to Psoriasis [ Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16 ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Percent Activity Impairment Due to Psoriasis [ Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16 ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Sleep Problems Index II [ Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided by Abbott
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Global Medical Services
Organization: Abbott
phone: 800-633-9110
Organization: Abbott
phone: 800-633-9110
No publications provided by Abbott
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Marie Rosenfeld, CRM, Abbott |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00566722 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | M10-238 |
| Study First Received: | December 1, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | April 28, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | April 8, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |