|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Insulin Aspart Drug: Insulin Lispro |
Participant Flow
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Patients with Type I diabetes mellitus using an insulin pump were recruited from the outpatient clinics. |
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| There was no run -in or transition before starting the test period. However, there was a wash out period of up to 2 weeks between the 2 test periods. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Aspart First, Washout, Then Lispro | Patients used Aspart Insulin for up to 100 hours, then entered a two week wash out period, then used Lispro insulin for up to 100 hours. Patients used the insulin at the same dose that they were using prior to entering the study. |
| Lispro First, Washout, Then Aspart | Patients used Lispro Insulin for up to 100 hours, then entered a two week wash out period, then used Aspart insulin for up to 100 hours. Patients used the insulin at the same dose that they were using prior to entering the study. |
| Aspart First, Washout, Then Lispro | Lispro First, Washout, Then Aspart | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 10 | 10 |
| COMPLETED | 10 | 10 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
| Aspart First, Washout, Then Lispro | Lispro First, Washout, Then Aspart | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 10 | 10 |
| COMPLETED | 10 | 10 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
| Aspart First, Washout, Then Lispro | Lispro First, Washout, Then Aspart | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 10 | 10 |
| COMPLETED | 10 | 10 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Entire Study Population | These are the characteristics of the entire study population. |
| Entire Study Population | |
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
20 |
|
Age
[1] [units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
45.5 ± 14.3 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|
| Female | 16 |
| Male | 4 |
| [1] | The mean age is the number that was calculated for the entire study sample and not separated according to the test period. |
|---|
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Number of Participants With Glycemic Control (Glucose Levels Between 180-300 mg/dL) 24 to 100 Hours After Line Change [ Time Frame: 24 to 100 hours after last pump infusion line change ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Daily Serum Glycomark Levels 48 to 100 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place [ Time Frame: 48 to 100 hours after keeping the same pump infusion line in place ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Oxidative Stress Marker 48, 72 and 96 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place [ Time Frame: Between 48, 72 and 96 hours after the last pump infusion line change ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Responsible Party: | Vivian Fonseca, MD, Tulane University Health Sciences Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00461331 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | F-0215 |
| Study First Received: | April 16, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | May 12, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | April 19, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |