Comparison of Antipsychotics for Metabolic Problems in Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder (CAMP)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00423878
First received: January 16, 2007
Last updated: November 16, 2012
Last verified: November 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: November 16, 2012
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Schizophrenia Schizoaffective Disorder |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Risperidone Drug: Olanzapine Drug: Quetiapine Drug: Aripiprazole |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Switch Group | Participants will switch to aripiprazole. |
| Stay Group | Participants will continue treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Switch Group | Stay Group | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 109 | 106 |
| COMPLETED | 89 | 98 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 20 | 8 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Switch Group | Participants will switch to aripiprazole. |
| Stay Group | Participants will continue treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Switch Group | Stay Group | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
109 | 106 | 215 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|||
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 109 | 106 | 215 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
40 ± 11.7 | 42 ± 10.5 | 41 ± 11.1 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 41 | 37 | 78 |
| Male | 68 | 69 | 137 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| United States | 109 | 106 | 215 |
|
non-HDL cholesterol
[units: mg/dL] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
169 ± 31.9 | 176 ± 33.5 | 173 ± 32.8 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Mean Difference in Non-HDL Cholesterol Level Changes Between Patients Assigned to Stay Compared to Patients Assigned to Switch at the Last Observation [ Time Frame: Measured at Month 6 ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 1| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Mean Difference in Non-HDL Cholesterol Level Changes Between Patients Assigned to Stay Compared to Patients Assigned to Switch at the Last Observation |
| Measure Description | No text entered. |
| Time Frame | Measured at Month 6 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The primary efficacy analysis was conducted on the efficacyevaluable population, defined as all patients randomly assigned to a study group who received at least one dose of study medication and completed at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Switch Group | Participants will switch to aripiprazole. |
| Stay Group | Participants will continue treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. |
Measured Values
| Switch Group | Stay Group | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
89 | 98 |
|
Mean Difference in Non-HDL Cholesterol Level Changes Between Patients Assigned to Stay Compared to Patients Assigned to Switch at the Last Observation
[units: mg/dL non-HDL cholesterol] Least Squares Mean ± Standard Error |
-20.2 ± 2.87 | -10.8 ± 2.57 |
No statistical analysis provided for Mean Difference in Non-HDL Cholesterol Level Changes Between Patients Assigned to Stay Compared to Patients Assigned to Switch at the Last Observation
| 2. Secondary: | Efficacy Failure, Defined as Psychiatric Hospitalization, a 25 Percent Increase From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or Substantial Clinical Deterioration on the Clinical Global Impressions-Change (CGI-C) [ Time Frame: Measured at Month 6 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| Open-label treatment is a limitation of this study, particularly for outcomes not measured in the laboratory but instead subject to clinical judgment. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Dr. Scott Stroup
Organization: Columbia University
phone: 212-543-5676
e-mail: stroups@nyspi.columbia.edu
Organization: Columbia University
phone: 212-543-5676
e-mail: stroups@nyspi.columbia.edu
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00423878 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | STROUP06STN0, DSIR AT-AP |
| Study First Received: | January 16, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | November 16, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | November 16, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |