|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Ovarian Cancer |
| Interventions: |
Biological: Abagovomab Biological: Placebo |
Participant Flow
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
|
Study population was recruited in 139 sites (Hospitals/University Clinics) distributed in Europe (Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland and Spain) and US. Date of first patient randomised: 08 December 2006 Date of last patient randomised: 26 December 2008 |
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Abagovomab | 2 mg/ml SC, every 2 weeks (for the first 4 doses - induction phase) and then every 4 weeks (maintenance phase) |
| Placebo | 2 mg/ml SC, every 2 weeks (for the first 4 doses - induction phase) and then every 4 weeks (maintenance phase) |
| Abagovomab | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 593 | 295 |
| TREATED | 592 | 294 |
| COMPLETED | 545 | 272 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 48 | 23 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Abagovomab | 2 mg/ml SC, every 2 weeks (for the first 4 doses - induction phase) and then every 4 weeks (maintenance phase) |
| Placebo | 2 mg/ml SC, every 2 weeks (for the first 4 doses - induction phase) and then every 4 weeks (maintenance phase) |
| Abagovomab | Placebo | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
593 | 295 | 888 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|||
| <=18 years | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 447 | 227 | 674 |
| >=65 years | 145 | 68 | 213 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
56.4 ± 10.57 | 56.0 ± 10.47 | 56.3 ± 10.53 |
|
Gender, Customized
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 593 | 295 | 888 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| France | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| United States | 91 | 47 | 138 |
| Hungary | 17 | 8 | 25 |
| Czech Republic | 54 | 28 | 82 |
| Poland | 53 | 25 | 78 |
| Spain | 55 | 48 | 103 |
| Belgium | 19 | 4 | 23 |
| Germany | 206 | 93 | 299 |
| Italy | 97 | 40 | 137 |
|
Histology of ovarian tumor
[units: participants] |
|||
| Serous/papillary | 481 | 245 | 726 |
| Endometrioid | 38 | 21 | 59 |
| Mucinous | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| Undifferentiated | 14 | 7 | 21 |
| Mixed tumor | 18 | 7 | 25 |
| Others | 33 | 12 | 45 |
| missing | 3 | 0 | 3 |
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS)
[1] [units: participants] |
|||
| 0 | 460 | 240 | 700 |
| 1 | 131 | 55 | 186 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
Grade of histologic differentiation
[2] [units: participants] |
|||
| G1-G2 | 160 | 82 | 242 |
| G3-G4 | 365 | 185 | 550 |
| GX | 12 | 4 | 16 |
| not done | 56 | 24 | 80 |
|
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage
[3] [units: participants] |
|||
| III | 513 | 252 | 765 |
| IV | 80 | 42 | 122 |
| missing | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
Tumor size after debulking surgery
[units: participants] |
|||
| <= 1 cm | 479 | 232 | 711 |
| > 1 cm | 114 | 63 | 177 |
|
Serum CA-125 after 3rd chemotherapy cycle
[units: participants] |
|||
| <= 35 U/ml | 479 | 239 | 718 |
| > 35 U/ml | 114 | 55 | 169 |
| missing | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| [1] | This scale and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a patient's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the patient, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The scale runs from the score 0 to 5, with 0 denoting the status "Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction" and 5 the status "Dead". |
|---|---|
| [2] | Histologic grade, also called differentiation, refers to how much the tumor cells resemble normal cells of the same tissue type. GX Grade cannot be assessed (Undetermined grade) G1 Well-differentiated (Low grade) - best prognosis G2 Moderately differentiated (Intermediate grade) G3 Poorly differentiated (High grade) G4 Undifferentiated (High grade) - worst prognosis |
| [3] | International system of staging which identifies the spread of the ovarian cancer at the point of diagnosis [STAGE 1 - Tumour is confined to the ovary / ovaries; STAGE 2 – Tumour involves one or both ovaries and has extended into the pelvis; STAGE 3 – The tumour involves one or both ovaries with microscopically confirmed peritoneal metastasis outside the pelvis and/or regional lymph node metastasis, includes liver capsule metastasis; STAGE: 4 – Distant metastasis beyond the peritoneal cavity, liver parenchymal metastasis.] |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Recurrence Free Survival Evaluated by Clinical Event Adjudication Committee (CEAC) [ Time Frame: Every 12 weeks up to recurrence or up to 3 months after last administered dose ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Overall Survival [ Time Frame: 2 years ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Safety [ Time Frame: Along treatment administration and up to double blind observation period. i.e. for each patient after the first dose administration till the f inal study visit, or within 12 weeks of the last dose ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Time Course of Immunoresponse [ Time Frame: at baseline, at week 10 after first dose administration and at final study visit (at week 4 or week 12 after the last administered dose, as appropriate) ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Responsible Party: | Menarini Group |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00418574 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | ABA-01, AGO-OVAR 10, 2006-002801-30 |
| Study First Received: | January 4, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | July 1, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | November 17, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration United States: Institutional Review Board Germany: Paul-Ehrlich-Institut Germany: Ethics Commission Belgium: Directorate general for the protection of Public health: Medicines Belgium: Institutional Review Board Italy: Ethics Committee Czech Republic: State Institute for Drug Control Hungary: National Institute of Pharmacy Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines Poland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products |